mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:53:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E8D905.7030809@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E8EC9F020000780002B383@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 08/11/2014 07:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> The existing comments explain what every byte means.
>> They are useful if CFI-literate reader wants to check correctness
>> of the encoding of this annotation.
>>
>> There is no overall comment what this CFI annotation
>> *achieves*. In human language, what do we say
>> to DWARF decoder here?
> 
> Short answer: DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression.
> 
> Longer response: Just like I said before, what you're asking for is
> identical to ask for each other CFI annotation to get a comment
> associated to tell you what it's doing, which I don't think you
> really mean to ask for. (Our main problem here is that we can't
> specify expressions with the .cfi_* gas directives, and hence have
> to resort to .cfi_escape.)
> 

No, in *human language*.  What does the DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression
actually aim to accomplish?  If you don't know the innards of the DWARF
spec, the whole thing might as well be Hungarian.

	-hpa


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-11 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-01 14:48 [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:30   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 17:04   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 14:28     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 14:47       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 15:34         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:03       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 21:23         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 10:35         ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 14:53           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-05 15:17             ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 23:02               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-07  9:54             ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:09   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-01 18:30   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-01 22:11     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 22:13       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:14         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-02 21:23           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:38             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-01 22:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 23:19   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-04  3:03     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04  7:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-11  0:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-11  8:40         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11  9:07           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-11  9:31             ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 13:26           ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-11 14:17             ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 14:53               ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-08-11 15:08                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 15:13                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-12  9:31                     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-12  9:50                       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53E8D905.7030809@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome