From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: "benbjiang(蒋彪)" <benbjiang@tencent.com>
Cc: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: reduce preemption with IDLE tasks runable(Internet mail)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:57:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55f04582-69d6-aeb4-85be-3e46a3b15beb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <643B0ECE-D758-4D08-8B1B-C70F34DD9943@tencent.com>
On 14/08/2020 01:55, benbjiang(蒋彪) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Aug 13, 2020, at 2:39 AM, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/08/2020 05:19, benbjiang(蒋彪) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 11:54 PM, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/08/2020 02:41, benbjiang(蒋彪) wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2020, at 9:24 PM, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/08/2020 17:52, benbjiang(蒋彪) wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 9:29 PM, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 03/08/2020 13:26, benbjiang(蒋彪) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 4:16 PM, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 01/08/2020 04:32, Jiang Biao wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
[...]
>>> ** 2normal+1idle: idle preempt normal every 600+ms **
>>
>> During the 3.2s the 2 SCHED_OTHER tasks run, the SCHED_IDLE task is
>> switched in only once, after ~2.5s.
> Use your config with loop increased from 200 to 2000, to observe longer,
>
> <...>-37620 [002] d... 47950.446191: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-1 prev_pid=37620 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> <...>-37619 [002] d... 47955.687709: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-0 prev_pid=37619 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> // The first preemption interval is 5.2s.
> <...>-37620 [002] d... 47956.375716: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-1 prev_pid=37620 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> <...>-37619 [002] d... 47957.060722: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-0 prev_pid=37619 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> <...>-37620 [002] d... 47957.747728: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-1 prev_pid=37620 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> <...>-37620 [002] d... 47958.423734: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-1 prev_pid=37620 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> <...>-37620 [002] d... 47959.119740: sched_switch: prev_comm=task_other-1 prev_pid=37620 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=task_idle-2 next_pid=37621 next_prio=120
> // After the first preemption, the rest preemption intervals are all about 600ms+. :)
Are you sure about this?
The math is telling me for the:
idle task: (3 / (1024 + 1024 + 3))^(-1) * 4ms = 2735ms
normal task: (1024 / (1024 + 1024 + 3))^(-1) * 4ms = 8ms
(4ms - 250 Hz)
>>> ** 3normal+idle: idle preempt normal every 1000+ms **
>>
>> Ah, this was meant to be 3 SCHED_OTHER tasks only! To see the difference
>> in behavior.
> With 3 SCHED_OHTER tasks only, the SCHED_OHTER task is switched in
> Every 27ms.
normal task: (1024 / (1024 + 1024 + 1024))^(-1) * 4ms = 12ms
>>> ** 2normal(nice 19)+1idle(nice 0): idle preempt normal every 30+ms **
>>
>> During the 3.2s the 2 SCHED_OTHER tasks run, the SCHED_IDLE task is
>> switched in every ~45ms.
> That’s as what I expected. :)
idle task: (3 / (15 + 15 + 3))^(-1) * 4ms = 44ms
normal task: (15 / (15 + 15 + 3))^(-1) * 4ms = 9ms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-01 2:32 [PATCH] sched/fair: reduce preemption with IDLE tasks runable Jiang Biao
2020-08-03 8:16 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-03 11:26 ` [PATCH] sched/fair: reduce preemption with IDLE tasks runable(Internet mail) benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-06 13:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-06 15:52 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-10 13:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-11 0:41 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-11 15:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-12 3:19 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-12 18:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-13 23:55 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-17 8:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2020-08-17 12:05 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-19 10:46 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-19 11:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-19 11:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-08-19 14:27 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-19 14:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-20 0:13 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-20 7:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-20 11:27 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
2020-08-20 12:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-20 14:28 ` Jiang Biao
2020-08-20 14:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-08-21 0:14 ` Jiang Biao
2020-08-19 14:10 ` benbjiang(蒋彪)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55f04582-69d6-aeb4-85be-3e46a3b15beb@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=benbjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®