From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mpa@pengutronix.de, treding@nvidia.com,
bparrot@ti.com, acourbot@nvidia.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] gpio: DT: Rephrase "gpios" of hog node to support multiple gpios
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:31:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E6E753.1020505@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457703804-3016-5-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
On 03/11/2016 06:43 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> The property "gpios" of GPIO hog node support the multiple GPIO entries.
> Rephrase the details of this property for this new support.
>
> Add details of new property "label" for GPIO label name.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> Optional properties:
> - line-name: The GPIO label name. If not present the node name is used.
> +- label: The GPIO lable name. This can have multiple string for GPIO
> + label names to match with the GPIOs in "gpios" properties.
> + If line-name is prosent than name is taken from line-name. If
> + it is not then the name will be taken from label. If both are
> + not available then node name is used for GPIO label name.
Why are there two properties for the same thing? Why not just allow
line-name to have multiple entries instead of introducing a new property?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-11 13:43 [PATCH V2 0/5] gpio: of: Add error handling and support for multiple gpio in gpio-hog Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-11 13:43 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] gpio: of: Scan available child node for gpio-hog Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:09 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-11 13:43 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] gpio: gpiolib: Print error number if gpio hog failed Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:11 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-11 13:43 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] gpio: of: Return error if gpio hog configuration failed Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:12 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-16 11:10 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-13 12:43 ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-13 12:54 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-04-14 12:52 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-11 13:43 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] gpio: DT: Rephrase "gpios" of hog node to support multiple gpios Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-14 16:31 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2016-03-15 6:37 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 15:40 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-15 14:16 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-11 13:43 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] gpio: of: Add support to have multiple gpios in gpio-hog Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-15 14:21 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-16 11:18 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E6E753.1020505@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome