mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Goran Radenovic <goran.radni@gmail.com>
Cc: boerge.struempfel@gmail.com, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: imx8mp: Add Ultratronik Ultra-MACH SBC
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 13:01:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <578ea477-c68c-4427-8013-550bf4f9c05b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26194c8d-c16f-4293-8c0f-5c674e09a1ba@gmail.com>

On 12/06/2025 12:09, Goran Radenovic wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback, and you're absolutely right — I made a mistake 
> here.
> 
> That said, I’m still a bit confused by your earlier comment:
> 
>      "That's just part of the standard/first enum."
> 
> I’m introducing a new board from a new manufacturer, so I expected to 
> add a new enum block — similar to how it's done for other vendor entries 

No, you are expected to add to existing enum.

> in the same file. I ran dt_binding_check, and it passed without errors 
> for this structure.

Not possible. The syntax is clearly wrong, so there is no way it passed
any tests. And Rob's report is a proof of that.

> 
> Could you clarify which “standard/first enum” you were referring to? 
> Should all i.MX8MP-based boards share a single enum block, regardless of 
> vendor?

Don't they? Look around in this file.

> 
> Thanks again for your guidance.

Don't top post but reply inline.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-11 11:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: dts: Add support for Ultratronik i.MX8MP " Goran Rađenović
2025-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Add i.MX8MP Ultra-MACH SBC to ULTRATRONIK BOARD SUPPORT Goran Rađenović
2025-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: imx8mp: Add Ultratronik Ultra-MACH SBC Goran Rađenović
2025-06-12  0:07   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-06-12  7:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-12 10:09     ` Goran Radenovic
2025-06-12 11:01       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-06-20  8:53         ` Goran Radenovic
2025-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add initial support for Ultratronik imx8mp-ultra-mach-sbc board Goran Rađenović
2025-06-11 15:34   ` Frank Li
2025-06-20  9:58     ` Goran Radenovic
2025-06-11 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: dts: Add support for Ultratronik i.MX8MP Ultra-MACH SBC Rob Herring (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=578ea477-c68c-4427-8013-550bf4f9c05b@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=boerge.struempfel@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=goran.radni@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®