From: Goran Radenovic <goran.radni@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: boerge.struempfel@gmail.com, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: imx8mp: Add Ultratronik Ultra-MACH SBC
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:53:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2cd9f09-b984-4409-9b3b-7b6335dd23ea@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <578ea477-c68c-4427-8013-550bf4f9c05b@kernel.org>
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/06/2025 12:09, Goran Radenovic wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback, and you're absolutely right — I made a mistake
>> here.
>>
>> That said, I’m still a bit confused by your earlier comment:
>>
>> "That's just part of the standard/first enum."
>>
>> I’m introducing a new board from a new manufacturer, so I expected to
>> add a new enum block — similar to how it's done for other vendor entries
>
> No, you are expected to add to existing enum.
Very well, I'll add the entry to the existing `description: i.MX8MP
based Boards` block.
>
>> in the same file. I ran dt_binding_check, and it passed without errors
>> for this structure.
>
> Not possible. The syntax is clearly wrong, so there is no way it passed
> any tests. And Rob's report is a proof of that.
>
You are right for v2. I was referring to v1. Sorry for the confusion.
>>
>> Could you clarify which “standard/first enum” you were referring to?
>> Should all i.MX8MP-based boards share a single enum block, regardless of
>> vendor?
>
> Don't they? Look around in this file.
>
I did, and I've learned something.
>>
>> Thanks again for your guidance.
>
> Don't top post but reply inline.
>
Ok, thank you for the correction.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards
Goran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 11:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: dts: Add support for Ultratronik i.MX8MP " Goran Rađenović
2025-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Add i.MX8MP Ultra-MACH SBC to ULTRATRONIK BOARD SUPPORT Goran Rađenović
2025-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: imx8mp: Add Ultratronik Ultra-MACH SBC Goran Rađenović
2025-06-12 0:07 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-06-12 7:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-12 10:09 ` Goran Radenovic
2025-06-12 11:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-06-20 8:53 ` Goran Radenovic [this message]
2025-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add initial support for Ultratronik imx8mp-ultra-mach-sbc board Goran Rađenović
2025-06-11 15:34 ` Frank Li
2025-06-20 9:58 ` Goran Radenovic
2025-06-11 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: dts: Add support for Ultratronik i.MX8MP Ultra-MACH SBC Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2cd9f09-b984-4409-9b3b-7b6335dd23ea@gmail.com \
--to=goran.radni@gmail.com \
--cc=boerge.struempfel@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®