From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Tao Zhang <tao1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] x86/vmscape: Deploy BHB clearing mitigation
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:23:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cdca004-5228-4f07-b9b8-901880f59bb7@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119-vmscape-bhb-v4-9-1adad4e69ddc@linux.intel.com>
On 11/20/25 08:19, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> IBPB mitigation for VMSCAPE is an overkill on CPUs that are only affected
> by the BHI variant of VMSCAPE. On such CPUs, eIBRS already provides
> indirect branch isolation between guest and host userspace. However, branch
> history from guest may also influence the indirect branches in host
> userspace.
>
> To mitigate the BHI aspect, use clear_bhb_loop().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst
> index d9b9a2b6c114c05a7325e5f3c9d42129339b870b..dc63a0bac03d43d1e295de0791dd6497d101f986 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst
> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ The possible values in this file are:
> run a potentially malicious guest and issues an IBPB before the first
> exit to userspace after VM-exit.
>
> + * 'Mitigation: Clear BHB before exit to userspace':
> +
> + As above, conditional BHB clearing mitigation is enabled.
> +
> * 'Mitigation: IBPB on VMEXIT':
>
> IBPB is issued on every VM-exit. This occurs when other mitigations like
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> index 15a2fa8f2f48a066e102263513eff9537ac1d25f..1e8c26c37dbed4256b35101fb41c0e1eb6ef9272 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> @@ -388,6 +388,8 @@ extern void write_ibpb(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> extern void clear_bhb_loop(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void clear_bhb_loop(void) {}
> #endif
>
> extern void (*x86_return_thunk)(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index cbb3341b9a19f835738eda7226323d88b7e41e52..d12c07ccf59479ecf590935607394492c988b2ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -109,9 +109,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, x86_spec_ctrl_current);
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_spec_ctrl_current);
>
> /*
> - * Set when the CPU has run a potentially malicious guest. An IBPB will
> - * be needed to before running userspace. That IBPB will flush the branch
> - * predictor content.
> + * Set when the CPU has run a potentially malicious guest. Indicates that a
> + * branch predictor flush is needed before running userspace.
> */
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user);
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user);
> @@ -3200,13 +3199,15 @@ enum vmscape_mitigations {
> VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO,
> VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER,
> VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT,
> + VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER,
> };
>
> static const char * const vmscape_strings[] = {
> - [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE] = "Vulnerable",
> + [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE] = "Vulnerable",
> /* [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO] */
> - [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER] = "Mitigation: IBPB before exit to userspace",
> - [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT] = "Mitigation: IBPB on VMEXIT",
> + [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER] = "Mitigation: IBPB before exit to userspace",
> + [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT] = "Mitigation: IBPB on VMEXIT",
> + [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER] = "Mitigation: Clear BHB before exit to userspace",
> };
>
> static enum vmscape_mitigations vmscape_mitigation __ro_after_init =
> @@ -3253,8 +3254,19 @@ static void __init vmscape_select_mitigation(void)
> vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
> break;
>
> + case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER:
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL))
> + vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
> + break;
Am I missing something or this case can never execute because
VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER is only ever set if mitigation
is VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO in the below branch? Perhaps just remove it?
This just shows how confusing the logic for choosing the mitigations has
become....
> case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO:
> - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
> + /*
> + * CPUs with BHI_CTRL(ADL and newer) can avoid the IBPB and use BHB
> + * clear sequence. These CPUs are only vulnerable to the BHI variant
> + * of the VMSCAPE attack and does not require an IBPB flush.
> + */
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL))
> + vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER;
> + else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
> vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER;
> else
> vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-21 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 6:17 [PATCH v4 00/11] VMSCAPE optimization for BHI variant Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] x86/bhi: x86/vmscape: Move LFENCE out of clear_bhb_loop() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:15 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 16:56 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:58 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] x86/bhi: Move the BHB sequence to a macro for reuse Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:28 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 16:57 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 0:21 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] x86/bhi: Make the depth of BHB-clearing configurable Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 17:02 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] x86/bhi: Make clear_bhb_loop() effective on newer CPUs Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 12:33 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 16:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 18:16 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:42 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 21:26 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 21:36 ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-24 19:21 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-22 11:05 ` david laight
2025-11-24 19:31 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 11:34 ` david laight
2025-12-04 1:40 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-12-04 9:15 ` david laight
2025-12-04 21:56 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-12-05 9:21 ` david laight
2025-11-26 19:23 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-06 21:00 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 22:32 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-06 22:57 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 23:29 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07 0:35 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-07 1:00 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07 1:10 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-07 2:41 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07 5:05 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-09 22:29 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-09 23:05 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10 0:00 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-10 0:08 ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10 0:52 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] x86/vmscape: Rename x86_ibpb_exit_to_user to x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] x86/vmscape: Move mitigation selection to a switch() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:27 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-24 23:09 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 10:19 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-25 17:45 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] x86/vmscape: Use write_ibpb() instead of indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 12:59 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] x86/vmscape: Use static_call() for predictor flush Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] x86/vmscape: Deploy BHB clearing mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:18 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 18:29 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:23 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2025-11-21 18:41 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:53 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 21:29 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 6:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] x86/vmscape: Override conflicting attack-vector controls with =force Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:04 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 6:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] x86/vmscape: Add cmdline vmscape=on to override attack vector controls Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 11:41 ` Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cdca004-5228-4f07-b9b8-901880f59bb7@suse.com \
--to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tao1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®