mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Tao Zhang <tao1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] x86/vmscape: Deploy BHB clearing mitigation
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:23:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cdca004-5228-4f07-b9b8-901880f59bb7@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119-vmscape-bhb-v4-9-1adad4e69ddc@linux.intel.com>



On 11/20/25 08:19, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> IBPB mitigation for VMSCAPE is an overkill on CPUs that are only affected
> by the BHI variant of VMSCAPE. On such CPUs, eIBRS already provides
> indirect branch isolation between guest and host userspace. However, branch
> history from guest may also influence the indirect branches in host
> userspace.
> 
> To mitigate the BHI aspect, use clear_bhb_loop().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst |  4 ++++
>   arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h          |  2 ++
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c                    | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst
> index d9b9a2b6c114c05a7325e5f3c9d42129339b870b..dc63a0bac03d43d1e295de0791dd6497d101f986 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/vmscape.rst
> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ The possible values in this file are:
>      run a potentially malicious guest and issues an IBPB before the first
>      exit to userspace after VM-exit.
>   
> + * 'Mitigation: Clear BHB before exit to userspace':
> +
> +   As above, conditional BHB clearing mitigation is enabled.
> +
>    * 'Mitigation: IBPB on VMEXIT':
>   
>      IBPB is issued on every VM-exit. This occurs when other mitigations like
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> index 15a2fa8f2f48a066e102263513eff9537ac1d25f..1e8c26c37dbed4256b35101fb41c0e1eb6ef9272 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> @@ -388,6 +388,8 @@ extern void write_ibpb(void);
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>   extern void clear_bhb_loop(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void clear_bhb_loop(void) {}
>   #endif
>   
>   extern void (*x86_return_thunk)(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index cbb3341b9a19f835738eda7226323d88b7e41e52..d12c07ccf59479ecf590935607394492c988b2ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -109,9 +109,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, x86_spec_ctrl_current);
>   EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_spec_ctrl_current);
>   
>   /*
> - * Set when the CPU has run a potentially malicious guest. An IBPB will
> - * be needed to before running userspace. That IBPB will flush the branch
> - * predictor content.
> + * Set when the CPU has run a potentially malicious guest. Indicates that a
> + * branch predictor flush is needed before running userspace.
>    */
>   DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user);
>   EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user);
> @@ -3200,13 +3199,15 @@ enum vmscape_mitigations {
>   	VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO,
>   	VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER,
>   	VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT,
> +	VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER,
>   };
>   
>   static const char * const vmscape_strings[] = {
> -	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE]		= "Vulnerable",
> +	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE]			= "Vulnerable",
>   	/* [VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO] */
> -	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER]	= "Mitigation: IBPB before exit to userspace",
> -	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT]	= "Mitigation: IBPB on VMEXIT",
> +	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER]		= "Mitigation: IBPB before exit to userspace",
> +	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT]		= "Mitigation: IBPB on VMEXIT",
> +	[VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER]	= "Mitigation: Clear BHB before exit to userspace",
>   };
>   
>   static enum vmscape_mitigations vmscape_mitigation __ro_after_init =
> @@ -3253,8 +3254,19 @@ static void __init vmscape_select_mitigation(void)
>   			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
>   		break;
>   
> +	case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER:
> +		if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL))
> +			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
> +		break;

Am I missing something or this case can never execute because 
VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER is only ever set if mitigation 
is VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO in the below branch? Perhaps just remove it? 
This just shows how confusing the logic for choosing the mitigations has 
become....



>   	case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO:
> -		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
> +		/*
> +		 * CPUs with BHI_CTRL(ADL and newer) can avoid the IBPB and use BHB
> +		 * clear sequence. These CPUs are only vulnerable to the BHI variant
> +		 * of the VMSCAPE attack and does not require an IBPB flush.
> +		 */
> +		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL))
> +			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_BHB_CLEAR_EXIT_TO_USER;
> +		else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
>   			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER;
>   		else
>   			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;


<snip>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-20  6:17 [PATCH v4 00/11] VMSCAPE optimization for BHI variant Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] x86/bhi: x86/vmscape: Move LFENCE out of clear_bhb_loop() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:15   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 16:56     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:58       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] x86/bhi: Move the BHB sequence to a macro for reuse Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:28   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 16:57     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25  0:21   ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] x86/bhi: Make the depth of BHB-clearing configurable Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 17:02   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] x86/bhi: Make clear_bhb_loop() effective on newer CPUs Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 12:33   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 16:40   ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 16:45     ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 16:50       ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 18:16         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:42           ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 21:26             ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 21:36               ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-24 19:21                 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-22 11:05               ` david laight
2025-11-24 19:31                 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 11:34                   ` david laight
2025-12-04  1:40                     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-12-04  9:15                       ` david laight
2025-12-04 21:56                         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-12-05  9:21                           ` david laight
2025-11-26 19:23     ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-06 21:00   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 22:32     ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-06 22:57       ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 23:29         ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07  0:35           ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-07  1:00             ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07  1:10               ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-07  2:41                 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07  5:05                   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-09 22:29                     ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-09 23:05                       ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  0:00                         ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-10  0:08                           ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  0:52                             ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] x86/vmscape: Rename x86_ibpb_exit_to_user to x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] x86/vmscape: Move mitigation selection to a switch() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:27   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-24 23:09     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 10:19       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-25 17:45         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] x86/vmscape: Use write_ibpb() instead of indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 12:59   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] x86/vmscape: Use static_call() for predictor flush Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] x86/vmscape: Deploy BHB clearing mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:18   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 18:29     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:23   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2025-11-21 18:41     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:53       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 21:29         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] x86/vmscape: Override conflicting attack-vector controls with =force Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:04   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] x86/vmscape: Add cmdline vmscape=on to override attack vector controls Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 11:41   ` Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5cdca004-5228-4f07-b9b8-901880f59bb7@suse.com \
    --to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tao1.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®