mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Tao Zhang <tao1.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] x86/vmscape: Move mitigation selection to a switch()
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:27:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8d197cb-bd8d-42b0-a32b-8d8f77c96567@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119-vmscape-bhb-v4-6-1adad4e69ddc@linux.intel.com>



On 11/20/25 08:19, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> This ensures that all mitigation modes are explicitly handled, while
> keeping the mitigation selection for each mode together. This also prepares
> for adding BHB-clearing mitigation mode for VMSCAPE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 1e9b11198db0fe2483bd17b1327bcfd44a2c1dbf..233594ede19bf971c999f4d3cc0f6f213002c16c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -3231,17 +3231,31 @@ early_param("vmscape", vmscape_parse_cmdline);
>   
>   static void __init vmscape_select_mitigation(void)
>   {
> -	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_VMSCAPE) ||
> -	    !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB)) {
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_VMSCAPE)) {
>   		vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (vmscape_mitigation == VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO) {
> -		if (should_mitigate_vuln(X86_BUG_VMSCAPE))
> +	if ((vmscape_mitigation == VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO) &&
> +	    !should_mitigate_vuln(X86_BUG_VMSCAPE))
> +		vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
> +
> +	switch (vmscape_mitigation) {
> +	case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE:
> +		break;
> +
> +	case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT:
> +	case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER:
> +		if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
> +			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_AUTO:
> +		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
>   			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_EXIT_TO_USER;


IMO this patch is a net-negative because as per my reply to patch 9 you 
have effectively a dead branch:

The clear BHB_CLEAR_USER one, however it turns out you have yet another 
one: VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT as it's only ever set in 
vmscape_update_mitigation() which executes after '_select()' as well and 
additionally you duplicate the FEATURE_IBPB check.

So I think either dropping it or removing the superfluous branches is in 
order.

>   		else
>   			vmscape_mitigation = VMSCAPE_MITIGATION_NONE;
> +		break;
>   	}
>   }
>   
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-20  6:17 [PATCH v4 00/11] VMSCAPE optimization for BHI variant Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] x86/bhi: x86/vmscape: Move LFENCE out of clear_bhb_loop() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:15   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 16:56     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:58       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] x86/bhi: Move the BHB sequence to a macro for reuse Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 16:28   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20 16:57     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25  0:21   ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] x86/bhi: Make the depth of BHB-clearing configurable Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20 17:02   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] x86/bhi: Make clear_bhb_loop() effective on newer CPUs Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 12:33   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 16:40   ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 16:45     ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 16:50       ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 18:16         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:42           ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-21 21:26             ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 21:36               ` Dave Hansen
2025-11-24 19:21                 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-22 11:05               ` david laight
2025-11-24 19:31                 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 11:34                   ` david laight
2025-12-04  1:40                     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-12-04  9:15                       ` david laight
2025-12-04 21:56                         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-12-05  9:21                           ` david laight
2025-11-26 19:23     ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-06 21:00   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 22:32     ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-06 22:57       ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-06 23:29         ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07  0:35           ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-07  1:00             ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07  1:10               ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-07  2:41                 ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-07  5:05                   ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-09 22:29                     ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-09 23:05                       ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  0:00                         ` Pawan Gupta
2026-03-10  0:08                           ` Jim Mattson
2026-03-10  0:52                             ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] x86/vmscape: Rename x86_ibpb_exit_to_user to x86_predictor_flush_exit_to_user Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] x86/vmscape: Move mitigation selection to a switch() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:27   ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2025-11-24 23:09     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 10:19       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-25 17:45         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] x86/vmscape: Use write_ibpb() instead of indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 12:59   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] x86/vmscape: Use static_call() for predictor flush Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] x86/vmscape: Deploy BHB clearing mitigation Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:18   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 18:29     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 14:23   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 18:41     ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:53       ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-21 21:29         ` Pawan Gupta
2025-11-20  6:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] x86/vmscape: Override conflicting attack-vector controls with =force Pawan Gupta
2025-11-21 18:04   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-11-20  6:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] x86/vmscape: Add cmdline vmscape=on to override attack vector controls Pawan Gupta
2025-11-25 11:41   ` Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8d197cb-bd8d-42b0-a32b-8d8f77c96567@suse.com \
    --to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tao1.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®