Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: qcom: Add camera clock controller driver for SM8150

["Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_skakitap@quicinc.com>]

On 7/11/2024 3:21 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 10/07/2024 23:10, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> - Why is cam_cc_gdsc_clk not modelled in the clock framework?
>>>
>>> This clock is kept enabled from probe, hence not required to be 
>>> modelled
>>> explicitly.
>> Yes, I'm asking why it's kept up enabled from probe rather than via
>> clock framework?
>
> FWIW my preference is to do it as Dmitry is suggesting here.
>
> I'm not a big fan of hitting the register and leaving it as-is, would 
> much prefer to move to the model of having the CCF do it - so that for 
> example the clock appears in the /sys clock summary.
>

This clock is PoR ON clock and expected to be always enabled from HW 
perspective, we are just re-ensuring it is ON from probe. Modelling this 
clock is unnecessary, and we have been following this approach for  gdsc 
clock in all the recent chipsets, like for example sm8550 camcc.


> ---
> bod