From: "NG, TZE YEE" <tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
Tanmay Kathpalia <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mmc: sdhci-cadence: read SD6HC DDR50 tuning from device tree
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:24:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6502547b-4f83-49c1-b622-9b6d7bf982de@altera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4aafce14-2be7-46a6-9d5b-8df35646dc0a@intel.com>
On 24/9/2026 2:40 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 22/09/2026 14:12,tze.yee.ng@altera.com wrote:
>> From: Tze Yee Ng<tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
>>
>> DDR50 has no CMD19 tuning, so the SD6HC read path relies on static PHY
>> settings that need board/SoC characterisation. Read the read-DQS delay,
>> read-DQS source and phony DQS assertion timing from the new
>> cdns,ddr50-read-dqs-delay, cdns,ddr50-use-lpbk-dqs and
>> cdns,ddr50-phony-dqs-timing DT properties at PHY probe, range-check them,
> Firmware values are expected to be correct, and so are not validated.
> >> and apply them only in DDR50. When a property is absent the existing
>> driver default is kept - for the phony DQS timing, the derived
>> REBAR_PULSE_CYCLES-1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tze Yee Ng<tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence-phy-v6.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence-phy-v6.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence-phy-v6.c
>> index 84592ae42762..0f47fa62d894 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence-phy-v6.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cadence-phy-v6.c
>> @@ -129,6 +129,11 @@ struct sdhci_cdns6_phy {
>> /* Active delay element (ps); doubled when one SDMCLK requires > 256 steps */
>> u32 delay_element;
>>
>> + /* DDR read-path overrides (SoC-specific) */
>> + s32 ddr_read_dqs_delay;
>> + s32 ddr_use_lpbk_dqs;
>> + s32 ddr_phony_dqs_timing;
>> +
>> /* PHY_DLL_SLAVE_CTRL register fields */
>> u8 cp_read_dqs_cmd_delay; /* bits [31:24] */
>> u8 cp_clk_wrdqs_delay; /* bits [23:16] */
>> @@ -145,6 +150,7 @@ struct sdhci_cdns6_phy {
>> /* PHY_DQS_TIMING register fields */
>> bool cp_use_phony_dqs; /* bit [20] */
>> bool cp_use_phony_dqs_cmd; /* bit [19] */
>> + bool cp_use_lpbk_dqs; /* bit [21] */
>>
>> /* PHY_CTRL register fields */
>> u32 cp_phony_dqs_timing;
>> @@ -523,6 +529,12 @@ static void sdhci_cdns6_phy_calc_dat_in(struct sdhci_cdns6_phy *phy)
>> if (phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200)
>> phy->cp_read_dqs_delay = phy->hs200_tune_val;
>>
>> + if (phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 && phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay >= 0)
>> + phy->cp_read_dqs_delay = phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay &
>> + SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DLL_SLAVE_CTRL_READ_DQS_DELAY;
> So here is unnecessarily assuming DT is providing a bad value. It could just be:
>
> if (phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 && phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay >= 0)
> phy->cp_read_dqs_delay = phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay;
>
>> +
>> + phy->cp_use_lpbk_dqs = 1;
>> +
>> if (phy->sdhc_extended_rd_mode &&
>> (phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 ||
>> phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52))
>> @@ -530,6 +542,18 @@ static void sdhci_cdns6_phy_calc_dat_in(struct sdhci_cdns6_phy *phy)
>> else
>> phy->cp_phony_dqs_timing = 0;
>>
>> + if (phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 && phy->ddr_use_lpbk_dqs >= 0)
>> + phy->cp_use_lpbk_dqs = phy->ddr_use_lpbk_dqs &
>> + FIELD_MAX(SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_LPBK_DQS);
> Ditto
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The phony DQS timing derived above depends on the board's SD flight
>> + * time, so allow a DT override to re-position the fabricated strobe.
>> + */
>> + if (phy->mode == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 && phy->ddr_phony_dqs_timing >= 0)
>> + phy->cp_phony_dqs_timing = phy->ddr_phony_dqs_timing &
>> + FIELD_MAX(SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_CTRL_PHONY_DQS_TIMING);
> Ditto
>
>> +
>> if (strobe_dat) {
>> /* dqs loopback input via IO cell */
>> hcsdclkadj += phy->iocell_input_delay;
>> @@ -693,10 +717,11 @@ int sdhci_cdns6_phy_init(struct sdhci_cdns_priv *priv)
>> sdhci_cdns6_dll_reset(priv, true);
>>
>> reg = sdhci_cdns6_read_phy_reg(priv, SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_REG);
>> + reg &= ~SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_LPBK_DQS;
>> reg &= ~SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_PHONY_DQS;
>> reg &= ~SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_PHONY_DQS_CMD;
>> reg |= SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_EXT_LPBK_DQS;
>> - reg |= SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_LPBK_DQS;
>> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_LPBK_DQS, phy->cp_use_lpbk_dqs);
>> reg |= FIELD_PREP(SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_PHONY_DQS, phy->cp_use_phony_dqs);
>> reg |= FIELD_PREP(SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_USE_PHONY_DQS_CMD, phy->cp_use_phony_dqs_cmd);
>> sdhci_cdns6_write_phy_reg(priv, SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DQS_TIMING_REG, reg);
>> @@ -881,6 +906,7 @@ int sdhci_cdns6_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct sdhci_cdns_priv *
>> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> struct sdhci_cdns6_phy *phy;
>> unsigned long val;
>> + u32 prop;
>> int ret;
>>
>> phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*phy), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -919,6 +945,50 @@ int sdhci_cdns6_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct sdhci_cdns_priv *
>>
>> phy->delay_element_org = phy->delay_element;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Optional DDR50 read-path tuning. These are board/card-characterised
>> + * values with no CMD19 tuning in DDR50; absence keeps the driver
>> + * default (-1 => not overridden).
>> + */
>> + phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay = -1;
>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "cdns,ddr50-read-dqs-delay",
>> + &prop)) {
>> + if (prop > SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DLL_SLAVE_CTRL_READ_DQS_DELAY) {
>> + dev_warn(dev,
>> + "cdns,ddr50-read-dqs-delay %u out of range, clamping to %lu\n",
>> + prop,
>> + (unsigned long)SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DLL_SLAVE_CTRL_READ_DQS_DELAY);
>> + prop = SDHCI_CDNS6_PHY_DLL_SLAVE_CTRL_READ_DQS_DELAY;
>> + }
>> + phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay = prop;
>> + }
> If the unnecessary validation is dropped:
>
> phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay = -1;
> of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "cdns,ddr50-read-dqs-delay", &phy->ddr_read_dqs_delay);
>
> etc
Agreed on all of them. I'll drop the range checks, the clamps and the
& FIELD_MAX() masks. FIELD_PREP() already masks on write, so those masks
were redundant anyway.
Two of these also change form in v2 after Krzysztof's review, which
removes the validation naturally:
- read-dqs-delay becomes ps (cdns,ddr-read-dqs-delay-ps): probe is just
of_property_read_u32() into a u32 defaulting to 0; calc converts ps ->
delay elements. No clamp.
- use-lpbk-dqs becomes a boolean (cdns,ddr-use-lpbk-dqs):
of_property_read_bool(), so there's nothing to validate.
- phony-dqs-timing stays a u32, and I'll drop its clamp/mask too.
I'll also reword the commit message to drop "range-check them".
Thanks,
Tze Yee
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 11:12 [PATCH 0/4] mmc: sdhci-cadence: SD6HC DDR50 read-path tuning and fixes tze.yee.ng
2026-09-22 11:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] mmc: sdhci-cadence6: add PHY settle delay after tuning DLL re-lock tze.yee.ng
2026-09-24 6:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-09-30 11:11 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-24 8:49 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-09-30 11:11 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-26 10:44 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-09-30 12:05 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-22 11:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] mmc: sdhci-cadence6: program PHONY_DQS_TIMING for extended-read DDR tze.yee.ng
2026-09-24 6:41 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-09-26 10:45 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-09-30 10:24 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-22 11:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: mmc: cdns,sdhci: add SD6HC DDR50 read-path tuning tze.yee.ng
2026-09-26 10:48 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-09-30 12:31 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-30 13:16 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-28 8:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-30 13:13 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-09-22 11:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] mmc: sdhci-cadence: read SD6HC DDR50 tuning from device tree tze.yee.ng
2026-09-24 6:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-09-30 13:24 ` NG, TZE YEE [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6502547b-4f83-49c1-b622-9b6d7bf982de@altera.com \
--to=tze.yee.ng@altera.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®