From: Brett Creeley <bcreeley@amd.com>
To: Dong Yibo <dong100@mucse.com>,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
corbet@lwn.net, gur.stavi@huawei.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, danishanwar@ti.com, lee@trager.us,
gongfan1@huawei.com, lorenzo@kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com, lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com,
alexanderduyck@fb.com, richardcochran@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] net: rnpgbe: Add basic mbx ops support
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:54:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a0c5728-64a4-497a-a200-a0571ebe38f1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721113238.18615-4-dong100@mucse.com>
On 7/21/2025 4:32 AM, Dong Yibo wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Initialize basic mbx function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Yibo <dong100@mucse.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile | 5 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h | 46 ++
> .../net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_chip.c | 5 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_hw.h | 2 +
> .../net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c | 1 +
> .../net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.c | 623 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.h | 48 ++
> 7 files changed, 727 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile
> index 42c359f459d9..41177103b50c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile
> @@ -5,5 +5,6 @@
> #
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_MGBE) += rnpgbe.o
> -rnpgbe-objs := rnpgbe_main.o\
> - rnpgbe_chip.o
> +rnpgbe-objs := rnpgbe_main.o \
> + rnpgbe_chip.o \
> + rnpgbe_mbx.o
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h
> index 2ae836fc8951..46e2bb2fe71e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h
> @@ -63,9 +63,51 @@ struct mucse_mac_info {
> int clk_csr;
> };
>
> +struct mucse_hw;
> +
> +enum MBX_ID {
> + MBX_VF0 = 0,
> + MBX_VF1,
> + MBX_VF2,
> + MBX_VF3,
> + MBX_VF4,
> + MBX_VF5,
> + MBX_VF6,
> + MBX_VF7,
> + MBX_CM3CPU,
> + MBX_FW = MBX_CM3CPU,
> + MBX_VFCNT
> +};
> +
> +struct mucse_mbx_operations {
> + void (*init_params)(struct mucse_hw *hw);
> + int (*read)(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg,
> + u16 size, enum MBX_ID id);
> + int (*write)(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg,
> + u16 size, enum MBX_ID id);
> + int (*read_posted)(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg,
> + u16 size, enum MBX_ID id);
> + int (*write_posted)(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg,
> + u16 size, enum MBX_ID id);
> + int (*check_for_msg)(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID id);
> + int (*check_for_ack)(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID id);
> + void (*configure)(struct mucse_hw *hw, int num_vec,
> + bool enable);
> +};
> +
> +struct mucse_mbx_stats {
> + u32 msgs_tx;
> + u32 msgs_rx;
> + u32 acks;
> + u32 reqs;
> + u32 rsts;
> +};
> +
> #define MAX_VF_NUM (8)
>
> struct mucse_mbx_info {
> + struct mucse_mbx_operations ops;
> + struct mucse_mbx_stats stats;
> u32 timeout;
> u32 usec_delay;
> u32 v2p_mailbox;
> @@ -99,6 +141,8 @@ struct mucse_mbx_info {
> int share_size;
> };
>
> +#include "rnpgbe_mbx.h"
> +
> struct mucse_hw {
> void *back;
> u8 pfvfnum;
> @@ -110,6 +154,8 @@ struct mucse_hw {
> u16 vendor_id;
> u16 subsystem_device_id;
> u16 subsystem_vendor_id;
> + int max_vfs;
> + int max_vfs_noari;
> enum rnpgbe_hw_type hw_type;
> struct mucse_dma_info dma;
> struct mucse_eth_info eth;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_chip.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_chip.c
> index 38c094965db9..b0e5fda632f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_chip.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>
> #include "rnpgbe.h"
> #include "rnpgbe_hw.h"
> +#include "rnpgbe_mbx.h"
>
> /**
> * rnpgbe_get_invariants_n500 - setup for hw info
> @@ -67,7 +68,7 @@ static void rnpgbe_get_invariants_n500(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> mbx->fw_pf_mbox_mask = 0x2e200;
> mbx->fw_vf_share_ram = 0x2b000;
> mbx->share_size = 512;
> -
> + memcpy(&hw->mbx.ops, &mucse_mbx_ops_generic, sizeof(hw->mbx.ops));
> /* setup net feature here */
> hw->feature_flags |= M_NET_FEATURE_SG |
> M_NET_FEATURE_TX_CHECKSUM |
> @@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ static void rnpgbe_get_invariants_n500(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> M_NET_FEATURE_STAG_OFFLOAD;
> /* start the default ahz, update later */
> hw->usecstocount = 125;
> + hw->max_vfs = 7;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ static void rnpgbe_get_invariants_n210(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> /* update hw feature */
> hw->feature_flags |= M_HW_FEATURE_EEE;
> hw->usecstocount = 62;
> + hw->max_vfs_noari = 7;
> }
>
> const struct rnpgbe_info rnpgbe_n500_info = {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_hw.h
> index 2c7372a5e88d..ff7bd9b21550 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_hw.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> #define RNPGBE_RING_BASE (0x1000)
> #define RNPGBE_MAC_BASE (0x20000)
> #define RNPGBE_ETH_BASE (0x10000)
> +
> +#define RNPGBE_DMA_DUMY (0x000c)
> /* chip resourse */
> #define RNPGBE_MAX_QUEUES (8)
> /* multicast control table */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c
> index 08f773199e9b..1e8360cae560 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static int rnpgbe_add_adapter(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> hw->hw_addr = hw_addr;
> hw->dma.dma_version = dma_version;
> ii->get_invariants(hw);
> + hw->mbx.ops.init_params(hw);
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..56ace3057fea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,623 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright(c) 2022 - 2025 Mucse Corporation. */
> +
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include "rnpgbe.h"
> +#include "rnpgbe_mbx.h"
> +#include "rnpgbe_hw.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_read_mbx - Reads a message from the mailbox
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @msg: The message buffer
> + * @size: Length of buffer
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to read
> + *
> + * @return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + **/
> +int mucse_read_mbx(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> +
> + /* limit read to size of mailbox */
> + if (size > mbx->size)
> + size = mbx->size;
This is just min(size, mbx->size). There's no need to open code min().
> +
> + if (!mbx->ops.read)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return mbx->ops.read(hw, msg, size, mbx_id);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_write_mbx - Write a message to the mailbox
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @msg: The message buffer
> + * @size: Length of buffer
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to write
> + *
> + * @return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + **/
> +int mucse_write_mbx(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> +
> + if (size > mbx->size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!mbx->ops.write)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return mbx->ops.write(hw, msg, size, mbx_id);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_mbx_get_req - Read req from reg
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @reg: Register to read
> + *
> + * @return: the req value
> + **/
> +static u16 mucse_mbx_get_req(struct mucse_hw *hw, int reg)
> +{
> + /* force memory barrier */
> + mb();
> + return ioread32(hw->hw_addr + reg) & GENMASK(15, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_mbx_get_ack - Read ack from reg
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @reg: Register to read
> + *
> + * @return: the ack value
> + **/
> +static u16 mucse_mbx_get_ack(struct mucse_hw *hw, int reg)
> +{
> + /* force memory barrier */
> + mb();
> + return (mbx_rd32(hw, reg) >> 16);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_mbx_inc_pf_req - Increase req
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to read
> + *
> + * mucse_mbx_inc_pf_req read pf_req from hw, then write
> + * new value back after increase
> + **/
> +static void mucse_mbx_inc_pf_req(struct mucse_hw *hw,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + u32 reg, v;
> + u16 req;
> +
> + reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? PF2FW_COUNTER(mbx) :
> + PF2VF_COUNTER(mbx, mbx_id);
> + v = mbx_rd32(hw, reg);
> + req = (v & GENMASK(15, 0));
> + req++;
> + v &= GENMASK(31, 16);
> + v |= req;
> + /* force before write to hw */
> + mb();
> + mbx_wr32(hw, reg, v);
> + /* update stats */
Nit, but this comment is unnecessary. Same comment for all of the other
identical comments. They are just repeating "what" you are doing.
> + hw->mbx.stats.msgs_tx++;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_mbx_inc_pf_ack - Increase ack
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to read
> + *
> + * mucse_mbx_inc_pf_ack read pf_ack from hw, then write
> + * new value back after increase
> + **/
> +static void mucse_mbx_inc_pf_ack(struct mucse_hw *hw,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + u32 reg, v;
> + u16 ack;
> +
> + reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? PF2FW_COUNTER(mbx) :
> + PF2VF_COUNTER(mbx, mbx_id);
> + v = mbx_rd32(hw, reg);
> + ack = (v >> 16) & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + ack++;
> + v &= GENMASK(15, 0);
> + v |= (ack << 16);
> + /* force before write to hw */
> + mb();
> + mbx_wr32(hw, reg, v);
> + /* update stats */
> + hw->mbx.stats.msgs_rx++;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_check_for_msg - Checks to see if vf/fw sent us mail
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to check
> + *
> + * @return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + **/
> +int mucse_check_for_msg(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> +
> + if (!mbx->ops.check_for_msg)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return mbx->ops.check_for_msg(hw, mbx_id);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_check_for_ack - Checks to see if vf/fw sent us ACK
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to check
> + *
> + * @return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + **/
> +int mucse_check_for_ack(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> +
> + if (!mbx->ops.check_for_ack)
> + return -EIO;
> + return mbx->ops.check_for_ack(hw, mbx_id);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_poll_for_msg - Wait for message notification
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to poll
> + *
> + * @return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + **/
> +static int mucse_poll_for_msg(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int countdown = mbx->timeout;
> + int val;
> +
> + if (!countdown || !mbx->ops.check_for_msg)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return read_poll_timeout(mbx->ops.check_for_msg,
> + val, val == 0, mbx->usec_delay,
> + countdown * mbx->usec_delay,
> + false, hw, mbx_id);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_poll_for_ack - Wait for message acknowledgment
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to poll
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if it successfully received a message acknowledgment
> + **/
> +static int mucse_poll_for_ack(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int countdown = mbx->timeout;
> + int val;
> +
> + if (!countdown || !mbx->ops.check_for_ack)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return read_poll_timeout(mbx->ops.check_for_ack,
> + val, val == 0, mbx->usec_delay,
> + countdown * mbx->usec_delay,
> + false, hw, mbx_id);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_read_posted_mbx - Wait for message notification and receive message
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @msg: The message buffer
> + * @size: Length of buffer
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to read
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if it successfully received a message notification and
> + * copied it into the receive buffer.
> + **/
> +static int mucse_read_posted_mbx(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int ret_val;
> +
> + if (!mbx->ops.read)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + ret_val = mucse_poll_for_msg(hw, mbx_id);
> +
> + /* if ack received read message, otherwise we timed out */
> + if (!ret_val)
> + ret_val = mbx->ops.read(hw, msg, size, mbx_id);
> +
> + return ret_val;
IMO a more typical flow would be the following:
ret_val = mucse_poll_for_msg();
if (ret_val)
return ret_val;
return mbx->ops.read();
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_write_posted_mbx - Write a message to the mailbox, wait for ack
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @msg: The message buffer
> + * @size: Length of buffer
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to write
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if it successfully copied message into the buffer and
> + * received an ack to that message within delay * timeout period
> + **/
> +static int mucse_write_posted_mbx(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int ret_val;
> +
> + /* exit if either we can't write or there isn't a defined timeout */
> + if (!mbx->ops.write || !mbx->timeout)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + /* send msg and hold buffer lock */
> + ret_val = mbx->ops.write(hw, msg, size, mbx_id);
> +
> + /* if msg sent wait until we receive an ack */
> + if (!ret_val)
> + ret_val = mucse_poll_for_ack(hw, mbx_id);
> +
> + return ret_val;
IMO a more typical flow would be the following:
ret_val = mbx->ops.write();
if (ret_val)
return ret_val;
return mucse_poll_for_ack();
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_check_for_msg_pf - checks to see if the vf/fw has sent mail
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to check
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if the vf/fw has set the Status bit or else
> + * -EIO
> + **/
> +static int mucse_check_for_msg_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + u16 hw_req_count = 0;
> + int ret_val = -EIO;
> +
> + if (mbx_id == MBX_FW) {
> + hw_req_count = mucse_mbx_get_req(hw, FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx));
> + /* reg in hw should avoid 0 check */
This comment explains "what" you are doing/preventing, but if the
comment is necessary it should explain "why" it's being done.
> + if (mbx->mbx_feature & MBX_FEATURE_NO_ZERO) {
> + if (hw_req_count != 0 &&
> + hw_req_count != hw->mbx.fw_req) {
> + ret_val = 0;
> + hw->mbx.stats.reqs++;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (hw_req_count != hw->mbx.fw_req) {
> + ret_val = 0;
> + hw->mbx.stats.reqs++;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (mucse_mbx_get_req(hw, VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, mbx_id)) !=
> + hw->mbx.vf_req[mbx_id]) {
> + ret_val = 0;
> + hw->mbx.stats.reqs++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret_val;
Nit, but ret_val isn't really needed in this function. You can just
return 0 in all of the places where you set ret_val to 0. If you get
here you can "return -EIO".
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_check_for_ack_pf - checks to see if the VF has ACKed
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to check
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if the vf/fw has set the Status bit or else
> + * -EIO
> + **/
> +static int mucse_check_for_ack_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int ret_val = -EIO;
> + u16 hw_fw_ack;
> +
> + if (mbx_id == MBX_FW) {
> + hw_fw_ack = mucse_mbx_get_ack(hw, FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx));
> + if (hw_fw_ack != 0 &&
> + hw_fw_ack != hw->mbx.fw_ack) {
> + ret_val = 0;
> + hw->mbx.stats.acks++;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (mucse_mbx_get_ack(hw, VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, mbx_id)) !=
> + hw->mbx.vf_ack[mbx_id]) {
> + ret_val = 0;
> + hw->mbx.stats.acks++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret_val;
Ditto on ret_val being unnecessary.
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_obtain_mbx_lock_pf - obtain mailbox lock
> + * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to obtain
> + *
> + * This function maybe used in an irq handler.
Nit, s/maybe/may be/
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if we obtained the mailbox lock
> + **/
> +static int mucse_obtain_mbx_lock_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int try_cnt = 5000, ret;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx) :
> + PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, mbx_id);
> + while (try_cnt-- > 0) {
> + /* Take ownership of the buffer */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, reg, MBOX_PF_HOLD);
> + /* force write back before check */
> + wmb();
> + if (mbx_rd32(hw, reg) & MBOX_PF_HOLD)
> + return 0;
> + udelay(100);
> + }
> + return ret;
Just as Andrew said, this is uninitialized. I don't think ret is needed
at all in this function.
Please think about whether local variables are needed or not in the rest
of the patches.
In this case you return 0 right away on success and can return
-ETIMEDOUT (or whatever is appropriate) on failure.
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_write_mbx_pf - Places a message in the mailbox
> + * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
> + * @msg: The message buffer
> + * @size: Length of buffer
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to write
> + *
> + * This function maybe used in an irq handler.
> + *
> + * @return: 0 if it successfully copied message into the buffer
> + **/
> +static int mucse_write_mbx_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + u32 data_reg, ctrl_reg;
> + int ret_val = 0;
> + u16 i;
> +
> + data_reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? FW_PF_SHM_DATA(mbx) :
> + PF_VF_SHM_DATA(mbx, mbx_id);
> + ctrl_reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx) :
> + PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, mbx_id);
> + if (size > MUCSE_VFMAILBOX_SIZE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* lock the mailbox to prevent pf/vf/fw race condition */
> + ret_val = mucse_obtain_mbx_lock_pf(hw, mbx_id);
> + if (ret_val)
> + goto out_no_write;
Just return directly here. No need for a goto.
> +
> + /* copy the caller specified message to the mailbox memory buffer */
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
> + mbx_wr32(hw, data_reg + i * 4, msg[i]);
> +
> + /* flush msg and acks as we are overwriting the message buffer */
> + if (mbx_id == MBX_FW) {
> + hw->mbx.fw_ack = mucse_mbx_get_ack(hw, FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx));
> + } else {
> + hw->mbx.vf_ack[mbx_id] =
> + mucse_mbx_get_ack(hw, VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, mbx_id));
> + }
> + mucse_mbx_inc_pf_req(hw, mbx_id);
> +
> + /* Interrupt VF/FW to tell it a message
> + * has been sent and release buffer
> + */
> + if (mbx->mbx_feature & MBX_FEATURE_WRITE_DELAY)
> + udelay(300);
This delay seems arbitrary. How do you know 300us is sufficient?
> + mbx_wr32(hw, ctrl_reg, MBOX_CTRL_REQ);
> +
> +out_no_write:
This label isn't required, unless it's used in a future patch. If that's
the case introduce it in the future patch.
> + return ret_val;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_read_mbx_pf - Read a message from the mailbox
> + * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
> + * @msg: The message buffer
> + * @size: Length of buffer
> + * @mbx_id: Id of vf/fw to read
> + *
> + * This function copies a message from the mailbox buffer to the caller's
> + * memory buffer. The presumption is that the caller knows that there was
> + * a message due to a vf/fw request so no polling for message is needed.
> + *
> + * @return: 0 on success, negative on failure
> + **/
> +static int mucse_read_mbx_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + u32 data_reg, ctrl_reg;
> + int ret_val;
> + u32 i;
> +
> + data_reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? FW_PF_SHM_DATA(mbx) :
> + PF_VF_SHM_DATA(mbx, mbx_id);
> + ctrl_reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx) :
> + PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, mbx_id);
> +
> + if (size > MUCSE_VFMAILBOX_SIZE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /* lock the mailbox to prevent pf/vf race condition */
> + ret_val = mucse_obtain_mbx_lock_pf(hw, mbx_id);
> + if (ret_val)
> + goto out_no_read;
> +
> + /* we need this */
This comment doesn't seem useful at all. Why do you need this comment?
> + mb();
> + /* copy the message from the mailbox memory buffer */
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
> + msg[i] = mbx_rd32(hw, data_reg + 4 * i);
> + mbx_wr32(hw, data_reg, 0);
> +
> + /* update req */
> + if (mbx_id == MBX_FW) {
> + hw->mbx.fw_req = mucse_mbx_get_req(hw, FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx));
> + } else {
> + hw->mbx.vf_req[mbx_id] =
> + mucse_mbx_get_req(hw, VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, mbx_id));
> + }
> + /* Acknowledge receipt and release mailbox, then we're done */
> + mucse_mbx_inc_pf_ack(hw, mbx_id);
> + /* free ownership of the buffer */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, ctrl_reg, 0);
> +
> +out_no_read:
> + return ret_val;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_mbx_reset - reset mbx info, sync info from regs
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + *
> + * This function reset all mbx variables to default.
> + **/
> +static void mucse_mbx_reset(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int idx, v;
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < hw->max_vfs; idx++) {
> + v = mbx_rd32(hw, VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, idx));
> + hw->mbx.vf_req[idx] = v & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + hw->mbx.vf_ack[idx] = (v >> 16) & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, idx), 0);
> + }
> + v = mbx_rd32(hw, FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx));
> + hw->mbx.fw_req = v & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + hw->mbx.fw_ack = (v >> 16) & GENMASK(15, 0);
> +
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx), 0);
> +
> + if (PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx))
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx), 0);
> + if (PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx))
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx), 0);
> +
> + mbx_wr32(hw, FW_PF_MBOX_MASK(mbx), GENMASK(31, 16));
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_mbx_configure_pf - configure mbx to use nr_vec interrupt
> + * @hw: Pointer to the HW structure
> + * @nr_vec: Vector number for mbx
> + * @enable: TRUE for enable, FALSE for disable
> + *
> + * This function configure mbx to use interrupt nr_vec.
> + **/
> +static void mucse_mbx_configure_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw, int nr_vec,
> + bool enable)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> + int idx = 0;
Nit, you don't need to initialize idx. It's always initialized before
it's used.
> + u32 v;
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx < hw->max_vfs; idx++) {
> + v = mbx_rd32(hw, VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, idx));
> + hw->mbx.vf_req[idx] = v & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + hw->mbx.vf_ack[idx] = (v >> 16) & GENMASK(15, 0);
> +
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, idx), 0);
> + }
> + v = mbx_rd32(hw, FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx));
> + hw->mbx.fw_req = v & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + hw->mbx.fw_ack = (v >> 16) & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx), 0);
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < hw->max_vfs; idx++) {
> + /* vf to pf req interrupt */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, VF2PF_MBOX_VEC(mbx, idx),
> + nr_vec);
> + }
> +
> + if (PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx))
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx), 0);
> + /* allow vf to vectors */
> +
> + if (PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx))
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx), 0);
> + /* enable irq */
> + /* bind fw mbx to irq */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, FW2PF_MBOX_VEC(mbx), nr_vec);
> + /* allow CM3FW to PF MBX IRQ */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, FW_PF_MBOX_MASK(mbx), GENMASK(31, 16));
> + } else {
> + if (PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx))
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx),
> + GENMASK(31, 0));
> + /* disable irq */
> + if (PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx))
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx),
> + GENMASK(31, 0));
> +
> + /* disable CM3FW to PF MBX IRQ */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, FW_PF_MBOX_MASK(mbx), 0xfffffffe);
> +
> + /* reset vf->pf status/ctrl */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < hw->max_vfs; idx++)
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, idx), 0);
> + /* reset pf->cm3 ctrl */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx), 0);
> + /* used to sync link status */
> + mbx_wr32(hw, RNPGBE_DMA_DUMY, 0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mucse_init_mbx_params_pf - set initial values for pf mailbox
> + * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
> + *
> + * Initializes the hw->mbx struct to correct values for pf mailbox
> + */
> +static void mucse_init_mbx_params_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
> +
> + mbx->usec_delay = 100;
> + mbx->timeout = (4 * 1000 * 1000) / mbx->usec_delay;
> + mbx->stats.msgs_tx = 0;
> + mbx->stats.msgs_rx = 0;
> + mbx->stats.reqs = 0;
> + mbx->stats.acks = 0;
> + mbx->stats.rsts = 0;
> + mbx->size = MUCSE_VFMAILBOX_SIZE;
> +
> + mutex_init(&mbx->lock);
> + mucse_mbx_reset(hw);
> +}
> +
> +struct mucse_mbx_operations mucse_mbx_ops_generic = {
> + .init_params = mucse_init_mbx_params_pf,
> + .read = mucse_read_mbx_pf,
> + .write = mucse_write_mbx_pf,
> + .read_posted = mucse_read_posted_mbx,
> + .write_posted = mucse_write_posted_mbx,
> + .check_for_msg = mucse_check_for_msg_pf,
> + .check_for_ack = mucse_check_for_ack_pf,
> + .configure = mucse_mbx_configure_pf,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0b4183e53e61
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_mbx.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright(c) 2020 - 2025 Mucse Corporation. */
> +
> +#ifndef _RNPGBE_MBX_H
> +#define _RNPGBE_MBX_H
> +
> +#include "rnpgbe.h"
> +
> +/* 14 words */
> +#define MUCSE_VFMAILBOX_SIZE 14
Instead of the comment and the name, wouldn't it make more sense to
incorporate "words" into the define? Something like:
#define MUCSE_VFMAILBOX_WORDS 14
> +/* ================ PF <--> VF mailbox ================ */
> +#define SHARE_MEM_BYTES 64
> +static inline u32 PF_VF_SHM(struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx, int vf)
> +{
> + return mbx->pf_vf_shm_base + mbx->mbx_mem_size * vf;
> +}
> +
> +#define PF2VF_COUNTER(mbx, vf) (PF_VF_SHM(mbx, vf) + 0)
> +#define VF2PF_COUNTER(mbx, vf) (PF_VF_SHM(mbx, vf) + 4)
> +#define PF_VF_SHM_DATA(mbx, vf) (PF_VF_SHM(mbx, vf) + 8)
> +#define VF2PF_MBOX_VEC(mbx, vf) ((mbx)->vf2pf_mbox_vec_base + 4 * (vf))
> +#define PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, vf) ((mbx)->pf2vf_mbox_ctrl_base + 4 * (vf))
> +#define PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_LO(mbx) ((mbx)->pf_vf_mbox_mask_lo)
> +#define PF_VF_MBOX_MASK_HI(mbx) ((mbx)->pf_vf_mbox_mask_hi)
> +/* ================ PF <--> FW mailbox ================ */
> +#define FW_PF_SHM(mbx) ((mbx)->fw_pf_shm_base)
> +#define FW2PF_COUNTER(mbx) (FW_PF_SHM(mbx) + 0)
> +#define PF2FW_COUNTER(mbx) (FW_PF_SHM(mbx) + 4)
> +#define FW_PF_SHM_DATA(mbx) (FW_PF_SHM(mbx) + 8)
> +#define FW2PF_MBOX_VEC(mbx) ((mbx)->fw2pf_mbox_vec)
> +#define PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx) ((mbx)->pf2fw_mbox_ctrl)
> +#define FW_PF_MBOX_MASK(mbx) ((mbx)->fw_pf_mbox_mask)
> +#define MBOX_CTRL_REQ BIT(0) /* WO */
> +#define MBOX_PF_HOLD (BIT(3)) /* VF:RO, PF:WR */
> +#define MBOX_IRQ_EN 0
> +#define MBOX_IRQ_DISABLE 1
> +#define mbx_rd32(hw, reg) m_rd_reg((hw)->hw_addr + (reg))
> +#define mbx_wr32(hw, reg, val) m_wr_reg((hw)->hw_addr + (reg), (val))
> +
> +extern struct mucse_mbx_operations mucse_mbx_ops_generic;
> +
> +int mucse_read_mbx(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id);
> +int mucse_write_mbx(struct mucse_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size,
> + enum MBX_ID mbx_id);
> +int mucse_check_for_msg(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id);
> +int mucse_check_for_ack(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id);
> +#endif /* _RNPGBE_MBX_H */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 11:32 [PATCH v2 00/15] Add driver for 1Gbe network chips from MUCSE Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] net: rnpgbe: Add build support for rnpgbe Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 13:30 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-07-21 14:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-22 3:02 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 10:17 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-07-22 11:05 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 14:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-22 3:38 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 14:58 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-21 21:23 ` Brett Creeley
2025-07-22 4:59 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 11:29 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-23 3:01 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-23 20:09 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-24 6:10 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-25 9:51 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] net: rnpgbe: Add n500/n210 chip support Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 14:21 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-07-22 9:51 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 10:26 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-07-22 11:09 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 15:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-22 6:21 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 13:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] net: rnpgbe: Add basic mbx ops support Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 14:40 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-07-21 15:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-22 6:45 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 13:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-23 10:27 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 21:54 ` Brett Creeley [this message]
2025-07-22 7:39 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 11:35 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-23 3:07 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-23 14:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-25 10:11 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] net: rnpgbe: Add get_capability mbx_fw " Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 22:08 ` Brett Creeley
2025-07-22 8:04 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 13:19 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-23 3:15 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] net: rnpgbe: Add download firmware for n210 chip Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] net: rnpgbe: Add some functions for hw->ops Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] net: rnpgbe: Add get mac from hw Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] net: rnpgbe: Add irq support Dong Yibo
2025-07-22 13:25 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-23 3:21 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] net: rnpgbe: Add netdev register and init tx/rx memory Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] net: rnpgbe: Add netdev irq in open Dong Yibo
2025-07-22 14:03 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-23 6:13 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] net: rnpgbe: Add setup hw ring-vector, true up/down hw Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] net: rnpgbe: Add link up handler Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 15:47 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-22 6:48 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] net: rnpgbe: Add base tx functions Dong Yibo
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] net: rnpgbe: Add base rx function Dong Yibo
2025-07-22 14:14 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-23 6:49 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-21 11:32 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] net: rnpgbe: Add ITR for rx Dong Yibo
2025-07-22 11:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Add driver for 1Gbe network chips from MUCSE MD Danish Anwar
2025-07-22 11:35 ` Yibo Dong
2025-07-22 15:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-07-23 10:42 ` Yibo Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a0c5728-64a4-497a-a200-a0571ebe38f1@amd.com \
--to=bcreeley@amd.com \
--cc=Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dong100@mucse.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gongfan1@huawei.com \
--cc=gur.stavi@huawei.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@trager.us \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®