mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
	<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>,
	"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Fix missing address mask in recovery for errors in TDX/SEAM non-root mode
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 09:33:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79eca29a-8ba4-4ad9-b2e0-54d8e668f731@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR11MB60836014330204B2FBCC7418FC45A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On 6/27/25 09:24, Luck, Tony wrote:
> We've been sending a combined key+address in the "mce->addr" to
> user space for a while. Has anyone built infrastructure on top of that?

I'm not sure they can do anything useful with an address that has the
KeyID in the first place. The partitioning scheme is in an MSR, so
they'd need to be doing silly gymnastics to even decode the address.

Userspace can deal with the KeyID not being in the address. It's been
the default for ages. So, if we take it back out, I'd expect it fixes
more things than it breaks.

So, yeah, we should carefully consider it. But it still 100% looks like
the right thing to me to detangle the KeyID and physical address in the ABI.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-27 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 12:08 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for recovery for machine check " Adrian Hunter
2025-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Fix missing address mask in recovery for errors " Adrian Hunter
2025-06-18 12:36   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-18 14:55   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-19 11:57     ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-27 15:23       ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-27 15:25         ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-27 16:24           ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-27 16:33             ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-07-30 10:54               ` Adrian Hunter
2025-07-30 11:57                 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-30 14:20                 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-27 16:28         ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-18 23:20   ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 23:39     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-18 23:46       ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-18 23:57         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 23:53       ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: TDX: Do not clear poisoned pages Adrian Hunter
2025-06-18 12:39   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-18 14:58   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-25 14:33     ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-25 16:25       ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-25 16:31         ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-25 16:42           ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-25 16:57             ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-25 16:42         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-25 22:32         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-25 22:38           ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-26  1:19             ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 15:31               ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-26 22:20                 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 22:33                   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-27  0:56                     ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 23:09   ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79eca29a-8ba4-4ad9-b2e0-54d8e668f731@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®