From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred/signal: Prevent single-step upon ERETU completion
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 10:10:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a9d29bd-d247-4e57-8330-14f6a5008864@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e32dc7de-9f97-4857-8e07-0905a94acfad@zytor.com>
On 5/22/2025 12:20 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 5/21/25 23:05, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * To prevent infinite SIGTRAP handler loop if TF is used without an external
>> + * debugger, clear the software event flag in the augmented SS, ensuring no
>> + * single-step trap is pending upon ERETU completion.
>> + *
>> + * Note, this function should be called in sigreturn() before the original state
>> + * is restored to make sure the TF is read from the entry frame.
>> + */
>> +static __always_inline void prevent_single_step_upon_eretu(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * If the trap flag (TF) is set, i.e., the sigreturn() SYSCALL instruction
>> + * is being single-stepped, do not clear the software event flag in the
>> + * augmented SS, thus a debugger won't skip over the following instruction.
>> + */
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_FRED) && cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) &&
>> + !(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF))
>> + regs->fred_ss.swevent = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Minor nit (and I should have caught this when I saw your patch earlier):
>
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED) is unnecessary here, because when
> FRED is not enabled, regs->fred_ss.swevent will always be 0, and this
> bit has no function, so there is no point in making that extra test.
Yeah, less conditions, less complexity. I will remove it.
Thanks!
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-22 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 6:05 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-22 7:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-22 17:10 ` Xin Li [this message]
2025-05-22 17:20 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-22 17:33 ` Xin Li
2025-05-22 17:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-05-23 6:23 ` Xin Li
2025-05-22 17:54 ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-23 6:24 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a9d29bd-d247-4e57-8330-14f6a5008864@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®