From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/fred/signal: Prevent single-step upon ERETU completion
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 23:23:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98baeeed-345d-4ae9-9418-61df6c689516@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005d4d4c-f385-42e0-8a30-62c6d77ff0f0@citrix.com>
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h: In function
>>> 'prevent_single_step_upon_eretu':
>>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/sighandling.h:44:21: error: 'struct pt_regs'
>>>>> has no member named 'fred_ss'
>>> 44 | regs->fred_ss.swevent = 0;
>>> | ^~
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, this statement is under IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_FRED), which should
>> be a compile time FALSE with i386. Why it is still being compiled?
>
> Because what the compiler is seeing is:
>
> if (0 && ...)
> regs->fred_ss.swevent = 0;
>
> and the bad field name is found at parse time, while the whole
> expression is only discarded during optimisation.
>
> The one thing you can't IS_ENABLED() around is conditional fields. That
> needs to be full #ifdef.
Thanks a lot for the explanation. Just sent out v3 using #ifdef.
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-23 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 6:05 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-05-22 7:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-22 17:10 ` Xin Li
2025-05-22 17:20 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-22 17:33 ` Xin Li
2025-05-22 17:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-05-23 6:23 ` Xin Li [this message]
2025-05-22 17:54 ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-23 6:24 ` Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98baeeed-345d-4ae9-9418-61df6c689516@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®