From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
<sstabellini@kernel.org>, <puranjay@kernel.org>,
<broonie@kernel.org>, <mbenes@suse.cz>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
<ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
<kristina.martsenko@arm.com>, <liaochang1@huawei.com>,
<ardb@kernel.org>, <leitao@debian.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:31:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c342b54-553c-013e-bed0-bc723c20464a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJsh5oM3CoUELkvY@J2N7QTR9R3>
On 2025/8/12 19:13, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:54:54AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> ARM64 requires an additional check whether to reschedule on return
>> from interrupt. So add arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched() as the default
>> NOP implementation and hook it up into the need_resched() condition in
>> raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(). This allows ARM64 to implement
>> the architecture specific version for switching over to
>> the generic entry code.
>>
>> To align the structure of the code with irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>> from the generic entry code, hoist the need_irq_preemption()
>> and IS_ENABLED() check earlier. And different preemption check functions
>> are defined based on whether dynamic preemption is enabled.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> kernel/entry/common.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> Can you please split the change to kernel/entry/common.c into a separate
> patch? That doesn't depend on the arm64-specific changes, and it'll make
> it easier to handle any conflcits when merging this.
Sure, I'll split the change into separate patch.
>
> Mark.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
>> index 0159b625cc7f..0f0ba250efe8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
>> void preempt_schedule(void);
>> void preempt_schedule_notrace(void);
>>
>> +void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>>
>> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
>> @@ -92,11 +93,14 @@ void dynamic_preempt_schedule(void);
>> #define __preempt_schedule() dynamic_preempt_schedule()
>> void dynamic_preempt_schedule_notrace(void);
>> #define __preempt_schedule_notrace() dynamic_preempt_schedule_notrace()
>> +void dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void);
>> +#define irqentry_exit_cond_resched() dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>>
>> #else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
>>
>> #define __preempt_schedule() preempt_schedule()
>> #define __preempt_schedule_notrace() preempt_schedule_notrace()
>> +#define irqentry_exit_cond_resched() raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPTION */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
>> index 7c2299c1ba79..4f92664fd46c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
>> @@ -285,19 +285,8 @@ static void noinstr arm64_exit_el1_dbg(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> lockdep_hardirqs_on(CALLER_ADDR0);
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>> -DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
>> -#define need_irq_preemption() \
>> - (static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched))
>> -#else
>> -#define need_irq_preemption() (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
>> -#endif
>> -
>> static inline bool arm64_preempt_schedule_irq(void)
>> {
>> - if (!need_irq_preemption())
>> - return false;
>> -
>> /*
>> * DAIF.DA are cleared at the start of IRQ/FIQ handling, and when GIC
>> * priority masking is used the GIC irqchip driver will clear DAIF.IF
>> @@ -672,6 +661,24 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_pnmi(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> arm64_exit_nmi(regs, state);
>> }
>>
>> +void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!preempt_count()) {
>> + if (need_resched() && arm64_preempt_schedule_irq())
>> + preempt_schedule_irq();
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
>> +void dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched))
>> + return;
>> + raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched();
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
>> {
>> @@ -681,10 +688,8 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
>> irq_exit_rcu();
>>
>> - if (!preempt_count() && need_resched()) {
>> - if (arm64_preempt_schedule_irq())
>> - preempt_schedule_irq();
>> - }
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION))
>> + irqentry_exit_cond_resched();
>>
>> exit_to_kernel_mode(regs, state);
>> }
>> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
>> index b82032777310..4aa9656fa1b4 100644
>> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
>> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
>> @@ -142,6 +142,20 @@ noinstr irqentry_state_t irqentry_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched - Architecture specific need resched function
>> + *
>> + * Invoked from raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched() to check if need resched.
>> + * Defaults return true.
>> + *
>> + * The main purpose is to permit arch to skip preempt a task from an IRQ.
>> + */
>> +static inline bool arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched(void);
>> +
>> +#ifndef arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched
>> +static inline bool arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched(void) { return true; }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
>> {
>> if (!preempt_count()) {
>> @@ -149,7 +163,7 @@ void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
>> rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
>> - if (need_resched())
>> + if (need_resched() && arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched())
>> preempt_schedule_irq();
>> }
>> }
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 1:54 [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:05 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 2:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 2/7] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 2:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:01 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-12 11:01 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 3/7] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 4/7] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 6:26 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-06 6:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14 8:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:13 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14 9:31 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 6/7] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 7/7] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 6:59 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:08 ` [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 8:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:03 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14 9:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14 9:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c342b54-553c-013e-bed0-bc723c20464a@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®