From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
<sstabellini@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<puranjay@kernel.org>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <mbenes@suse.cz>,
<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>, <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
<kristina.martsenko@arm.com>, <liaochang1@huawei.com>,
<ardb@kernel.org>, <leitao@debian.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:49:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afb0fb39-c221-c4c0-08cb-c6941d3ff801@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4242ef37-efeb-446f-abbc-0104b805ad12@arm.com>
On 2025/8/12 0:02, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>
>> ARM64 requires an additional check whether to reschedule on return
>> from interrupt. So add arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched() as the default
>> NOP implementation and hook it up into the need_resched() condition in
>> raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(). This allows ARM64 to implement
>> the architecture specific version for switching over to
>> the generic entry code.
>>
>> To align the structure of the code with irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>> from the generic entry code, hoist the need_irq_preemption()
>> and IS_ENABLED() check earlier. And different preemption check functions
>> are defined based on whether dynamic preemption is enabled.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
> Unrelated to the other thread : I noticed that compiling this patch
> with `allnoconfig` would fail :
> - `raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched` has no previous prototype,
> as it is defined within `#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION`
> - `irqentry_exit_cond_resched()` is not declared, as it is also within
> `#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION`
You are right, thank you! I'll fix it.
>
> The patch below fixes the issue, but introduces merge conflicts in
> patches 6 and 7, plus the `#ifdef` needs to be moved accordingly
> in patch 6 and the empty "without preemption" `irq_exit_cond_resched()`
> needs to be removed in patch 7.
>
> I hope this can be useful,
> Ada
>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> index 0f0ba250efe8..d9aba8b1e466 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ void dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void);
> #define irqentry_exit_cond_resched() raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched()
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
> +#else /* CONFIG_PREEMPTION */
> +#define irqentry_exit_cond_resched() {}
> #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPTION */
>
> #endif /* __ASM_PREEMPT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index 4f92664fd46c..abd7a315145e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,7 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_pnmi(struct
> pt_regs *regs,
> arm64_exit_nmi(regs, state);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
> void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
> {
> if (!preempt_count()) {
> @@ -668,6 +669,7 @@ void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
> preempt_schedule_irq();
> }
> }
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 1:54 [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:05 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 2:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 2/7] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 2:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:01 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-12 11:01 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 3/7] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 4/7] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 5/7] arm64: entry: Refactor preempt_schedule_irq() check code Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:06 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 6:26 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-06 6:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-11 16:02 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14 8:49 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2025-08-12 11:13 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14 9:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 6/7] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-07-29 1:54 ` [PATCH -next v7 7/7] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:07 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 6:59 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-05 15:08 ` [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-06 8:11 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-11 16:03 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-08-14 9:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-08-12 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2025-08-14 9:39 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afb0fb39-c221-c4c0-08cb-c6941d3ff801@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®