mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] reset: socfpga: fix for 64-bit compilation
@ 2017-09-22 18:42 Dinh Nguyen
  2017-10-02 21:36 ` Dinh Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2017-09-22 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: p.zabel; +Cc: dinguyen, linux-kernel

The SoCFPGA Stratix10 reset controller has 32-bit registers. Thus, we
cannot use BITS_PER_LONG in computing the register and bit offset. Instead,
we should be using the width of the hardware register for the calculation.

Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c b/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c
index c60904f..3907bbc 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c
@@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ static int socfpga_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
 	struct socfpga_reset_data *data = container_of(rcdev,
 						     struct socfpga_reset_data,
 						     rcdev);
-	int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
-	int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
+	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
+	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 reg;
 
@@ -61,8 +62,9 @@ static int socfpga_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
 						     struct socfpga_reset_data,
 						     rcdev);
 
-	int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
-	int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
+	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
+	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 reg;
 
@@ -81,8 +83,9 @@ static int socfpga_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
 {
 	struct socfpga_reset_data *data = container_of(rcdev,
 						struct socfpga_reset_data, rcdev);
-	int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
-	int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
+	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
+	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
 	u32 reg;
 
 	reg = readl(data->membase + (bank * BANK_INCREMENT));
@@ -132,7 +135,7 @@ static int socfpga_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
 
 	data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
-	data->rcdev.nr_resets = NR_BANKS * BITS_PER_LONG;
+	data->rcdev.nr_resets = NR_BANKS * (sizeof(u32) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
 	data->rcdev.ops = &socfpga_reset_ops;
 	data->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] reset: socfpga: fix for 64-bit compilation
  2017-09-22 18:42 [PATCH] reset: socfpga: fix for 64-bit compilation Dinh Nguyen
@ 2017-10-02 21:36 ` Dinh Nguyen
  2017-10-04  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2017-10-02 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: p.zabel; +Cc: linux-kernel

Gentle ping?

Dinh

On 09/22/2017 01:42 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> The SoCFPGA Stratix10 reset controller has 32-bit registers. Thus, we
> cannot use BITS_PER_LONG in computing the register and bit offset. Instead,
> we should be using the width of the hardware register for the calculation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c b/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c
> index c60904f..3907bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-socfpga.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ static int socfpga_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  	struct socfpga_reset_data *data = container_of(rcdev,
>  						     struct socfpga_reset_data,
>  						     rcdev);
> -	int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
> -	int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
> +	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
> +	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> +	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	u32 reg;
>  
> @@ -61,8 +62,9 @@ static int socfpga_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  						     struct socfpga_reset_data,
>  						     rcdev);
>  
> -	int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
> -	int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
> +	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
> +	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> +	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	u32 reg;
>  
> @@ -81,8 +83,9 @@ static int socfpga_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>  {
>  	struct socfpga_reset_data *data = container_of(rcdev,
>  						struct socfpga_reset_data, rcdev);
> -	int bank = id / BITS_PER_LONG;
> -	int offset = id % BITS_PER_LONG;
> +	int reg_width = sizeof(u32);
> +	int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
> +	int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>  	u32 reg;
>  
>  	reg = readl(data->membase + (bank * BANK_INCREMENT));
> @@ -132,7 +135,7 @@ static int socfpga_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>  
>  	data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> -	data->rcdev.nr_resets = NR_BANKS * BITS_PER_LONG;
> +	data->rcdev.nr_resets = NR_BANKS * (sizeof(u32) * BITS_PER_BYTE);
>  	data->rcdev.ops = &socfpga_reset_ops;
>  	data->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] reset: socfpga: fix for 64-bit compilation
  2017-10-02 21:36 ` Dinh Nguyen
@ 2017-10-04  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
  2017-10-04 12:41     ` Dinh Nguyen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Zabel @ 2017-10-04  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dinh Nguyen; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi Dinh,

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 16:36 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Gentle ping?

Thank you, I've applied this patch to the reset/fixes branch.

regards
Philipp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] reset: socfpga: fix for 64-bit compilation
  2017-10-04  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
@ 2017-10-04 12:41     ` Dinh Nguyen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2017-10-04 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Philipp Zabel; +Cc: linux-kernel



On 10/04/2017 04:27 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Dinh,
> 
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 16:36 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Gentle ping?
> 
> Thank you, I've applied this patch to the reset/fixes branch.
> 

thanks Philipp!

Dinh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-04 12:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-22 18:42 [PATCH] reset: socfpga: fix for 64-bit compilation Dinh Nguyen
2017-10-02 21:36 ` Dinh Nguyen
2017-10-04  9:27   ` Philipp Zabel
2017-10-04 12:41     ` Dinh Nguyen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome