From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"markgross@kernel.org" <markgross@kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Enable opcode support on BIOS settings
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 18:36:43 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93f28f8b-67d4-496b-577d-12c106fe435@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90de5786-085c-4cff-8125-215c9ae20ad1@app.fastmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3138 bytes --]
On Mon, 29 May 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 7:51 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 May 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:
> >
> >> Whilst reviewing some documentation from the FW team on using WMI on
> >> Lenovo system I noticed that we weren't using Opcode support when
> >> changing BIOS settings in the thinkLMI driver.
> >>
> >> We should be doing this to ensure we're future proof as the old
> >> non-opcode mechanism has been deprecated.
> >>
> >> Tested on X1 Carbon G10 and G11.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v2: Update comment for clearer explanation of what the driver
> >> is doing
> >> Changes in v3: None. Version bump with rest of series
> >>
> >> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> >> index 1138f770149d..2745224f62ab 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> >> @@ -1001,7 +1001,33 @@ static ssize_t current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> >> tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->save_signature);
> >> if (ret)
> >> goto out;
> >> - } else { /* Non certiifcate based authentication */
> >> + } else if (tlmi_priv.opcode_support) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * If opcode support is present use that interface.
> >> + * Note - this sets the variable and then the password as separate
> >> + * WMI calls. Function tlmi_save_bios_settings will error if the
> >> + * password is incorrect.
> >> + */
> >> + set_str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s;", setting->display_name,
> >> + new_setting);
> >
> > Alignment.
>
> OK - I assume you want the new_setting lined up under the bracket.
> I've not seen that called out as a requirement (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html) but I don't mind fixing....but if you can point me at the specifics it's appreciated
Yes, I meant aligning to the column following the opening parenthesis.
I guess it's not a hard requirement, however, there's a benefit from
certain things aligning because it helps in the brains in the process of
converting text into structure with less effort (when not specifically not
focusing on that particular line).
> >> + if (!set_str) {
> >> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = tlmi_simple_call(LENOVO_SET_BIOS_SETTINGS_GUID, set_str);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto out;
> >> +
> >> + if (tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->valid && tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password[0]) {
> >> + ret = tlmi_opcode_setting("WmiOpcodePasswordAdmin",
> >> + tlmi_priv.pwd_admin->password);
> >
> > Align.
>
> Ack.
>
> >
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = tlmi_save_bios_settings("");
> >> + } else { /* old non opcode based authentication method (deprecated)*/
> >
> > non missing hyphen.
>
> non-opcode I assume?
I think the most proper English would be non-opcode-based since "opcode
based" belong together (but I'm not a native speaker here).
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-26 17:16 Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct System password interface Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 11:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:44 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:10 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct NVME password handling Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:58 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:06 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Don't display unnecessary authentication settings Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:50 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: mutex protection around multiple WMI calls Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:03 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Enable opcode support on BIOS settings Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:49 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-05-29 16:06 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-30 10:54 ` Hans de Goede
2023-05-30 13:08 ` Mark Pearson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93f28f8b-67d4-496b-577d-12c106fe435@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®