From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/bitops: Add set_bit_release()
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:15:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9505cbc2-7261-4f84-9769-b97e9acb1c38@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DMAHVQLCMQAN.3G0TBMA1UTM6H@garyguo.net>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2026, at 13:54, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Wed Oct 21, 2026 at 12:33 PM BST, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'm always confused by this and the new function makes it harder
>> to understand in the current form:
...
>> - Contrary to that, the kerneldoc comment over set_bit() mentions
>> "This is a relaxed atomic operation (no implied memory barriers)"
>> and leaves out the kcsan_mb() that is in test_and_set_bit().
>> This makes the new set_bit_release() sound like a /stronger/
>> version of set_bit() the same way that test_bit_acquire()
>> is a stronger version of the (relaxed) test_bit().
>
> set_bit has relaxed semantics while test_and_set_bit implies barrier. RISC-V for
> exmaple will generate the amoor instruction for set_bit, not amoor.aqrl.
Thanks for the clarification, I did misread the implementation
and see how I was confused once more.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 9:55 [PATCH 0/2] dma-fence: Order is-signaled-bit Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/bitops: Add set_bit_release() Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 11:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-21 11:54 ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 12:15 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-10-21 12:06 ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 12:17 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 12:24 ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 13:22 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Order setting of the signaled-bit properly Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 13:47 ` Christian König
2026-10-21 14:52 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 15:04 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9505cbc2-7261-4f84-9769-b97e9acb1c38@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®