mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
To: "Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/bitops: Add set_bit_release()
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:06:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMAI50AJ10UC.16G4TCC3VAM0J@garyguo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021095512.1345191-3-phasta@kernel.org>

On Wed Oct 21, 2026 at 10:55 AM BST, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> The kernel already has test_bit_acquire(). A set_bit_release(), however,
> was missing so far. It can be expected to be useful for parties that
> need release ordering, but not the stricter full ordering of the other
> bit-setting functions.
>
> Add set_bit_release().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h
> index c010d54275e4..fb2d1472fd4d 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-atomic.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,20 @@ static __always_inline bool test_and_set_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *ad
>  	return arch_test_and_set_bit(nr, addr);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * set_bit_release - Set a bit with release ordering
> + * @nr: Bit to set
> + * @addr: Address to start counting from
> + *
> + * This is an atomic ordered operation (implied write memory barrier).
> + */
> +static __always_inline void set_bit_release(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
> +{
> +	kcsan_wmb();
> +	instrument_atomic_write(addr + BIT_WORD(nr), sizeof(long));
> +	arch_set_bit(nr, addr);

This is just wrong. There's no code here that gives you the release semantics.

kcsan_wmb() is just an annotation and does nothing. wmb is also not release
semantics as it does not order LOAD->STORE.

Given that set_bit is a relaxed RMW atomic, you can implement set_bit_release
with just

    smp_mb__before_atomic();
    set_bit(nr, addr);

Which should be correct, but is too strong on some architectures (like RISC-V),
becuase it will produce a full MB instead. So we can either add release barriers
(hint: I really like it), or we can add arch_set_bit_release and implement it
per arch; on RISC-V for example it can then be translated to amoor.rl (which is
not being produced by any existing bit ops).c

Best,
Gary

> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * test_and_clear_bit - Clear a bit and return its old value
>   * @nr: Bit to clear



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21  9:55 [PATCH 0/2] dma-fence: Order is-signaled-bit Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21  9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/bitops: Add set_bit_release() Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 11:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-21 11:54     ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 12:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-21 12:06   ` Gary Guo [this message]
2026-10-21 12:17     ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 12:24       ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 13:22         ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21  9:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Order setting of the signaled-bit properly Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 13:47   ` Christian König
2026-10-21 14:52     ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 15:04       ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMAI50AJ10UC.16G4TCC3VAM0J@garyguo.net \
    --to=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®