From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ribalda@kernel.org>
To: git@apitzsch.eu
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht,
phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@mailoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] media: i2c: imx214: Fix link frequency
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 22:05:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_2hEzpDbQ-RHTOEcEm4BqL7ctZ0EzvnTMW6xbJBjsoTSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241207-imx214-v3-12-ab60af7ee915@apitzsch.eu>
Acked-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
nit: media: i2c: imx214: Fix link frequency validation
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024 at 9:49 PM André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
<devnull+git.apitzsch.eu@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: André Apitzsch <git@apitzsch.eu>
>
> The driver defines IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ 480000000, and then
> IMX214_DEFAULT_PIXEL_RATE ((IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ * 8LL) / 10),
> which works out as 384MPix/s. (The 8 is 4 lanes and DDR.)
>
> Parsing the PLL registers with the defined 24MHz input. We're in single
> PLL mode, so MIPI frequency is directly linked to pixel rate. VTCK ends
> up being 1200MHz, and VTPXCK and OPPXCK both are 120MHz. Section 5.3
> "Frame rate calculation formula" says "Pixel rate
> [pixels/s] = VTPXCK [MHz] * 4", so 120 * 4 = 480MPix/s, which basically
> agrees with my number above.
>
> 3.1.4. MIPI global timing setting says "Output bitrate = OPPXCK * reg
> 0x113[7:0]", so 120MHz * 10, or 1200Mbit/s. That would be a link
> frequency of 600MHz due to DDR.
> That also matches to 480MPix/s * 10bpp / 4 lanes / 2 for DDR.
>
> Keep the previous link frequency for backward compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Apitzsch <git@apitzsch.eu>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
> index 1330f13207beec0960c384681bf0b49e99fe860f..910ad03cda23345d3d10d13cd30f007954534e80 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx214.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,9 @@
> #define IMX214_REG_FAST_STANDBY_CTRL CCI_REG8(0x0106)
>
> #define IMX214_DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ 24000000
> -#define IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ 480000000
> +#define IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ 600000000
> +/* Keep wrong link frequency for backward compatibility */
> +#define IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ_LEGACY 480000000
> #define IMX214_DEFAULT_PIXEL_RATE ((IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ * 8LL) / 10)
> #define IMX214_FPS 30
>
> @@ -1216,18 +1218,22 @@ static int imx214_parse_fwnode(struct device *dev)
> goto done;
> }
>
Now that I think about this... We only support
buf_cfg.no_of_link_frequencies ==1.
Maybe you can add a check before the loop
if (bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies != 1)
dev_warn(dev, "Only one link-frequency
supported, please review your DT. Continuing anyway\n ")
> - for (i = 0; i < bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies; i++) {
> if (bus_cfg.link_frequencies[i] == IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ)
> break;
> -
> - if (i == bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies) {
> - dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> - "link-frequencies %d not supported, Please review your DT\n",
> - IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ);
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto done;
> + if (bus_cfg.link_frequencies[i] == IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ_LEGACY) {
> + dev_warn(dev,
> + "link-frequencies %d not supported, please review your DT. Continuing anyway\n",
> + IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ);
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> + if (i == bus_cfg.nr_of_link_frequencies)
> + ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "link-frequencies %d not supported, please review your DT\n",
> + IMX214_DEFAULT_LINK_FREQ);
> +
> done:
> v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_free(&bus_cfg);
> fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);
>
> --
> 2.47.1
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-08 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-07 20:47 [PATCH v3 00/12] media: i2c: imx214: Miscellaneous cleanups and improvements André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] media: i2c: imx214: Use subdev active state André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] media: i2c: imx214: Simplify with dev_err_probe() André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] media: i2c: imx214: Convert to CCI register access helpers André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] media: i2c: imx214: Replace register addresses with macros André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] media: i2c: imx214: Drop IMX214_REG_EXPOSURE from mode reg arrays André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] media: i2c: imx214: Check number of lanes from device tree André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-08 21:07 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2024-12-10 12:35 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] media: i2c: imx214: Add vblank and hblank controls André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-08 20:59 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2024-12-08 21:19 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2024-12-10 12:34 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-14 22:45 ` André Apitzsch
2024-12-15 12:10 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-08 21:35 ` André Apitzsch
2024-12-08 21:47 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2024-12-15 22:35 ` André Apitzsch
2024-12-16 13:00 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2024-12-17 7:17 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] media: i2c: imx214: Implement vflip/hflip controls André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] media: i2c: imx214: Add analogue/digital gain control André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] media: i2c: imx214: Verify chip ID André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-10 12:40 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-12-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] media: i2c: imx214: Add test pattern control André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-07 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] media: i2c: imx214: Fix link frequency André Apitzsch via B4 Relay
2024-12-08 21:05 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPybu_2hEzpDbQ-RHTOEcEm4BqL7ctZ0EzvnTMW6xbJBjsoTSg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ribalda@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=git@apitzsch.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.knecht@mailoo.org \
--cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®