From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 1/7
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:42:55 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209192233040.8911-100000@serv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020919201140.GB17131@kroah.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Greg KH wrote:
> > So the LSM module always says no. Don't make other modules suffer
>
> Ok, I don't have a problem with that, I was just trying to point out
> that not all modules can know when they are able to be unloaded, as
> Roman stated.
That's not really what I meant. Only the module can know whether it's safe
and somehow has to tell that module.c. The question is now how that should
be done.
bye, Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-19 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 2:05 Rusty Russell
2002-09-18 22:59 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-19 1:00 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-19 2:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-19 3:57 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-19 10:44 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-19 12:51 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-19 13:54 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-19 18:38 ` Greg KH
2002-09-19 18:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 20:11 ` Greg KH
2002-09-19 20:42 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2002-09-30 15:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-03 18:53 ` Rob Landley
2002-10-04 0:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-15 3:25 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-15 15:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-15 23:53 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-16 2:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-16 6:11 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-16 17:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-16 22:48 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-17 1:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-17 7:41 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-17 14:49 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-17 14:56 ` your mail Kai Germaschewski
2002-10-18 2:47 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-18 21:50 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-10-17 17:20 ` [RFC] change format of LSM hooks Daniel Phillips
2002-10-18 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-17 17:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-16 8:15 ` [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 1/7 Chris Wright
2002-09-19 20:10 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-20 1:22 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-20 4:32 ` Greg KH
2002-09-20 9:25 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-21 7:38 ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-09-22 23:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-19 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-20 9:32 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-21 4:17 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-21 17:09 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-23 0:20 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-24 10:16 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-24 14:54 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-25 0:46 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-25 5:50 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-25 11:36 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-25 12:53 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-25 21:28 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-26 1:49 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-26 23:38 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-27 1:11 ` Scott Murray
2002-09-27 1:34 ` Roman Zippel
2002-09-28 0:48 ` David Lang
2002-10-15 4:53 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0209192233040.8911-100000@serv \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®