* [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h.
@ 2007-05-20 7:57 Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-20 8:47 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-05-20 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Andrew Morton
Extract the common MODULE_INFO content found in both module.h and
moduleparam.h into a new header file moduleinfo.h, which at least
makes it possible for source files to someday stop including the
content from moduleparam.h when they don't need it.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
---
compile-tested with "make allmodconfig" on x86.
include/linux/module.h | 12 +++---------
include/linux/moduleinfo.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/moduleparam.h | 16 +++++-----------
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index e6e0f86..d9a9a13 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
#include <linux/elf.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
-#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h> /* Ideally, this shouldn't be necessary. */
+#include <linux/moduleinfo.h>
#include <asm/local.h>
#include <asm/module.h>
@@ -88,9 +89,6 @@ extern struct module __this_module;
#define THIS_MODULE ((struct module *)0)
#endif
-/* Generic info of form tag = "info" */
-#define MODULE_INFO(tag, info) __MODULE_INFO(tag, tag, info)
-
/* For userspace: you can also call me... */
#define MODULE_ALIAS(_alias) MODULE_INFO(alias, _alias)
@@ -130,11 +128,6 @@ extern struct module __this_module;
/* What your module does. */
#define MODULE_DESCRIPTION(_description) MODULE_INFO(description, _description)
-/* One for each parameter, describing how to use it. Some files do
- multiple of these per line, so can't just use MODULE_INFO. */
-#define MODULE_PARM_DESC(_parm, desc) \
- __MODULE_INFO(parm, _parm, #_parm ":" desc)
-
#define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(type,name) \
MODULE_GENERIC_TABLE(type##_device,name)
@@ -576,6 +569,7 @@ struct device_driver;
struct module;
extern struct kset module_subsys;
+struct kernel_param;
int mod_sysfs_init(struct module *mod);
int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod,
diff --git a/include/linux/moduleinfo.h b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cee86a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
+#define _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
+
+#ifdef MODULE
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+#define ___module_cat(a,b) __mod_ ## a ## b
+#define __module_cat(a,b) ___module_cat(a,b)
+#define __MODULE_INFO(tag, name, info) \
+static const char __module_cat(name,__LINE__)[] \
+ __attribute_used__ \
+ __attribute__((section(".modinfo"),unused)) = __stringify(tag) "=" info
+#else /* !MODULE */
+#define __MODULE_INFO(tag, name, info)
+#endif
+
+#define MODULE_INFO(tag, info) __MODULE_INFO(tag, tag, info)
+
+#endif // _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
index c83588c..650328d 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/moduleinfo.h>
/* You can override this manually, but generally this should match the
module name. */
@@ -13,19 +14,12 @@
#define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX KBUILD_MODNAME "."
#endif
-#ifdef MODULE
-#define ___module_cat(a,b) __mod_ ## a ## b
-#define __module_cat(a,b) ___module_cat(a,b)
-#define __MODULE_INFO(tag, name, info) \
-static const char __module_cat(name,__LINE__)[] \
- __attribute_used__ \
- __attribute__((section(".modinfo"),unused)) = __stringify(tag) "=" info
-#else /* !MODULE */
-#define __MODULE_INFO(tag, name, info)
-#endif
-#define __MODULE_PARM_TYPE(name, _type) \
+#define __MODULE_PARM_TYPE(name, _type) \
__MODULE_INFO(parmtype, name##type, #name ":" _type)
+#define MODULE_PARM_DESC(_parm, desc) \
+ __MODULE_INFO(parm, _parm, #_parm ":" desc)
+
struct kernel_param;
/* Returns 0, or -errno. arg is in kp->arg. */
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h.
2007-05-20 7:57 [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h Robert P. J. Day
@ 2007-05-20 8:47 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-20 10:28 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2007-05-20 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/moduleinfo.h b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..cee86a9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
> +#define _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
> +
> +#ifdef MODULE
> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> +#define ___module_cat(a,b) __mod_ ## a ## b
> +#define __module_cat(a,b) ___module_cat(a,b)
> +#define __MODULE_INFO(tag, name, info) \
> +static const char __module_cat(name,__LINE__)[] \
> + __attribute_used__ \
> + __attribute__((section(".modinfo"),unused)) = __stringify(tag) "=" info
This isn't a function definition so __attribute_used__ (which is
deprecated anyway) doesn't mean anything. Please simply use
__maybe_unused and remove "unused" from the second attribute.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h.
2007-05-20 8:47 ` David Rientjes
@ 2007-05-20 10:28 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-20 16:38 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-05-20 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton
On Sun, 20 May 2007, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/moduleinfo.h b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..cee86a9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/moduleinfo.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
> > +#define _LINUX_MODULEINFO_H
> > +
> > +#ifdef MODULE
> > +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> > +#define ___module_cat(a,b) __mod_ ## a ## b
> > +#define __module_cat(a,b) ___module_cat(a,b)
> > +#define __MODULE_INFO(tag, name, info) \
> > +static const char __module_cat(name,__LINE__)[] \
> > + __attribute_used__ \
> > + __attribute__((section(".modinfo"),unused)) = __stringify(tag) "=" info
>
> This isn't a function definition so __attribute_used__ (which is
> deprecated anyway) doesn't mean anything. Please simply use
> __maybe_unused and remove "unused" from the second attribute.
i can do that as long as there's no way that those changes can (even
theoretically) make a difference in the build. in order to make sure
this patch didn't break anything, i went with a straight cut-and-paste
of the content to go into the new moduleinfo.h.
so while i agree that those changes shouldn't hurt, personally, i'd
prefer to just put this patch through as is and come back later to do
any tidying related to attribute rewording.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h.
2007-05-20 10:28 ` Robert P. J. Day
@ 2007-05-20 16:38 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-20 17:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2007-05-20 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i can do that as long as there's no way that those changes can (even
> theoretically) make a difference in the build. in order to make sure
> this patch didn't break anything, i went with a straight cut-and-paste
> of the content to go into the new moduleinfo.h.
>
__attribute_used__ is pointless outside of function definitions so the way
it is currently written is incorrect.
> so while i agree that those changes shouldn't hurt, personally, i'd
> prefer to just put this patch through as is and come back later to do
> any tidying related to attribute rewording.
>
__attribute_used__ is deprecated so it would be helpful to change it now
instead of requiring a second patch. It's better if new patches no longer
use a deprecated attribute.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h.
2007-05-20 16:38 ` David Rientjes
@ 2007-05-20 17:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2007-05-20 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andrew Morton
On Sun, 20 May 2007, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > i can do that as long as there's no way that those changes can
> > (even theoretically) make a difference in the build. in order to
> > make sure this patch didn't break anything, i went with a straight
> > cut-and-paste of the content to go into the new moduleinfo.h.
>
> __attribute_used__ is pointless outside of function definitions so
> the way it is currently written is incorrect.
>
> > so while i agree that those changes shouldn't hurt, personally,
> > i'd prefer to just put this patch through as is and come back
> > later to do any tidying related to attribute rewording.
>
> __attribute_used__ is deprecated so it would be helpful to change it
> now instead of requiring a second patch. It's better if new patches
> no longer use a deprecated attribute.
fair enough. i'll submit a revised patch shortly.
rday
p.s. um ... just off-hand, i'm hoping that people understand the
rationale behind this patch.
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-20 17:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-20 7:57 [PATCH] Extract common MODULE_INFO content into new moduleinfo.h Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-20 8:47 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-20 10:28 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-20 16:38 ` David Rientjes
2007-05-20 17:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®