mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	will@crowder-design.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mikos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix OOPS in mmap_region() when merging adjacent VM_LOCKED file segments
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:12:44 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901302048360.18677@blonde.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901301159500.3150@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > 
> > So happens, I'm mapping with MAP_SHARED, so the VM_ACCOUNT flag gets
> > cleared later in mmap_region().  Comments say that this is for checking
> > memory availability during shmem_file_setup().  Maybe we can move the
> > temporary setting of VM_ACCOUNT until just before the call to
> > shmem_zero_setup()?
> 
> Yeah, that would probably fix it, and looks like the right thing to do. 

I do need to refresh my memory on that in a moment...

> 
> It all looks pretty confused wrong to set the whole VM_ACCOUNT flag for a 
> file-backed file AT ALL in the first place, but the code knows that it 
> won't matter for a shared file, and will be cleared again later.
> 
> So it plays these temporary games with vm_flags, and it didn't matter 
> because of how we used to call "vma_merge()" either early only for the 
> anonymous memory case (that had VM_ACCOUNT stable and didn't have that 
> temporary case at all) or much later (after having undone the temporary 
> flag setting) for files.

I'm to blame for those games, and now they've given trouble,
the right thing may be to put an end to them.

> 
> Why do we pass in that "accountable" flag, btw? It's only ever set to 0 by 
> a MAP_PRIVATE mapping that hits is_file_hugepages() (see do_mmap_pgoff), 
> and we could just do that decision all inside mmap_region(). So the flag 
> doesn't really seem to have any real meaning, and is just passed around 
> for some odd historical reason?

It looks like the "accountable" flag dates from before Miklos separated
mmap_region() out from do_mmap_pgoff(): so he just passed it on down to
mmap_region() as an additional argument, preferring to leave the more
complex MAP_PRIVATE/is_file_hugepages test behind in do_mmap_pgoff().

It seemed rather a random refactoring to me.  Looking at it again,
I wonder if we should be getting do_brk() to use mmap_region() too;
but my appetite for cleanups is low at present, bugs we have enough.

By the way, there's an argument to say that you should add
VM_MIXEDMAP to VM_CAN_NONLINEAR in VM_MERGEABLE_FLAGS: I don't
really care whether we merge the odd filemap_xip vma or not,
but it used to do so and now won't.

By the same (used to merge, now won't) argument, one could say
VM_INSERTPAGE should be there too; but whereas VM_MIXEDMAP is used
in one place only, quite a lot of drivers use vm_insert_page(), so
I feel more comfortable with the idea that it's stopping merges -
though in that case, shouldn't we add it to VM_SPECIAL?

But I'm caring more about that VM_ACCOUNT...

Hugh

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-30 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bb4a86c70901281151w4300605r3882461cd6e9774a@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901281316450.3123@localhost.localdomain>
2009-01-29 20:03   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-29 20:33     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 20:48       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 22:32         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-29 23:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30  4:43             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30  4:49               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 22:47         ` Maksim Yevmenkin
2009-01-29 22:48           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:31             ` Maksim Yevmenkin
2009-01-30  2:08           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30  5:56             ` Greg KH
2009-01-30 16:36               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 17:40                 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 18:14                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 18:30                     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 19:53                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 20:31                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 21:12                         ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2009-01-30 21:25                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 21:36                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 22:27                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 12:35                               ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-31 18:34                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 11:59                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-02 12:54                                     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-02 14:10                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-02 18:58                                         ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 19:23                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 21:50                                             ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 22:12                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:35                                                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 18:33                                       ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-03 16:13                                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-02-03 16:40                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 17:10                                   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-03 21:50                                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 21:37                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 12:16                             ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 20:33                       ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 20:53                       ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-30 20:59                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 21:11                           ` Will Crowder
2009-01-30 23:44                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-30  8:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 16:45           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 16:49             ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0901302048360.18677@blonde.anvils \
    --to=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@crowder-design.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®