From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
will@crowder-design.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mikos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix OOPS in mmap_region() when merging adjacent VM_LOCKED file segments
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:12:44 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901302048360.18677@blonde.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901301159500.3150@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> >
> > So happens, I'm mapping with MAP_SHARED, so the VM_ACCOUNT flag gets
> > cleared later in mmap_region(). Comments say that this is for checking
> > memory availability during shmem_file_setup(). Maybe we can move the
> > temporary setting of VM_ACCOUNT until just before the call to
> > shmem_zero_setup()?
>
> Yeah, that would probably fix it, and looks like the right thing to do.
I do need to refresh my memory on that in a moment...
>
> It all looks pretty confused wrong to set the whole VM_ACCOUNT flag for a
> file-backed file AT ALL in the first place, but the code knows that it
> won't matter for a shared file, and will be cleared again later.
>
> So it plays these temporary games with vm_flags, and it didn't matter
> because of how we used to call "vma_merge()" either early only for the
> anonymous memory case (that had VM_ACCOUNT stable and didn't have that
> temporary case at all) or much later (after having undone the temporary
> flag setting) for files.
I'm to blame for those games, and now they've given trouble,
the right thing may be to put an end to them.
>
> Why do we pass in that "accountable" flag, btw? It's only ever set to 0 by
> a MAP_PRIVATE mapping that hits is_file_hugepages() (see do_mmap_pgoff),
> and we could just do that decision all inside mmap_region(). So the flag
> doesn't really seem to have any real meaning, and is just passed around
> for some odd historical reason?
It looks like the "accountable" flag dates from before Miklos separated
mmap_region() out from do_mmap_pgoff(): so he just passed it on down to
mmap_region() as an additional argument, preferring to leave the more
complex MAP_PRIVATE/is_file_hugepages test behind in do_mmap_pgoff().
It seemed rather a random refactoring to me. Looking at it again,
I wonder if we should be getting do_brk() to use mmap_region() too;
but my appetite for cleanups is low at present, bugs we have enough.
By the way, there's an argument to say that you should add
VM_MIXEDMAP to VM_CAN_NONLINEAR in VM_MERGEABLE_FLAGS: I don't
really care whether we merge the odd filemap_xip vma or not,
but it used to do so and now won't.
By the same (used to merge, now won't) argument, one could say
VM_INSERTPAGE should be there too; but whereas VM_MIXEDMAP is used
in one place only, quite a lot of drivers use vm_insert_page(), so
I feel more comfortable with the idea that it's stopping merges -
though in that case, shouldn't we add it to VM_SPECIAL?
But I'm caring more about that VM_ACCOUNT...
Hugh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-30 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bb4a86c70901281151w4300605r3882461cd6e9774a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901281316450.3123@localhost.localdomain>
2009-01-29 20:03 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-29 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 20:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 22:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-29 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 4:43 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 4:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 22:47 ` Maksim Yevmenkin
2009-01-29 22:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:31 ` Maksim Yevmenkin
2009-01-30 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 5:56 ` Greg KH
2009-01-30 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 17:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 18:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 19:53 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 21:12 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2009-01-30 21:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 21:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 12:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-31 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 11:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-02 12:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-02 14:10 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-02 18:58 ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 21:50 ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 22:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:35 ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 18:33 ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-03 16:13 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-02-03 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 17:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-03 21:50 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 12:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 20:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 20:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-30 20:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 21:11 ` Will Crowder
2009-01-30 23:44 ` Greg KH
2009-01-30 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 16:49 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0901302048360.18677@blonde.anvils \
--to=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@crowder-design.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®