mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	will@crowder-design.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mikos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix OOPS in mmap_region() when merging adjacent VM_LOCKED file segments
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:25:41 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901301323040.3150@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901302048360.18677@blonde.anvils>



On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> But I'm caring more about that VM_ACCOUNT...

The bright side here is that I think the VM_ACCOUNT bit differences only 
really happen for MAP_SHARED file mappings. For MAP_SHARED anon mappings 
we already don't share (for other reasons), and for private mappings 
VM_ACCOUNT looks stable (ie it's reliably either set or not, and stays 
that way).

So the impact is reasonably low. But it would definitely be good to clean 
up that whole VM_ACCOUNT logic, and incidentally then fix that merging 
issue at the same time.

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-30 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bb4a86c70901281151w4300605r3882461cd6e9774a@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901281316450.3123@localhost.localdomain>
2009-01-29 20:03   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-29 20:33     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 20:48       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 22:32         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-29 23:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30  4:43             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30  4:49               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-29 22:47         ` Maksim Yevmenkin
2009-01-29 22:48           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:31             ` Maksim Yevmenkin
2009-01-30  2:08           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30  5:56             ` Greg KH
2009-01-30 16:36               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 17:40                 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 18:14                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 18:30                     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 19:53                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 20:31                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 21:12                         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 21:25                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-01-30 21:36                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 22:27                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 12:35                               ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-31 18:34                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 11:59                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-02 12:54                                     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-02 14:10                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-02 18:58                                         ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 19:23                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 21:50                                             ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 22:12                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:35                                                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-02 18:33                                       ` Mel Gorman
2009-02-03 16:13                                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-02-03 16:40                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 17:10                                   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-03 21:50                                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 21:37                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-31 12:16                             ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 20:33                       ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-30 20:53                       ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-30 20:59                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-01-30 21:11                           ` Will Crowder
2009-01-30 23:44                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-30  8:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 16:45           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-30 16:49             ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0901301323040.3150@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@crowder-design.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome