mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
To: 'James Morse' <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com" 
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"carl@os.amperecomputing.com" <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"lcherian@marvell.com" <lcherian@marvell.com>,
	"bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com" <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"xingxin.hx@openanolis.org" <xingxin.hx@openanolis.org>,
	"baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"peternewman@google.com" <peternewman@google.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:50:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB633047FDDF32B4A2CB5431B18B019@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021131204.5581-7-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James

> MPAM's PMG bits extend its PARTID space, meaning the same PMG value can
> be used for different control groups.
> 
> This means once a CLOSID is allocated, all its monitoring ids may still be dirty,
> and held in limbo.
> 
> Add a helper to allow the CLOSID allocator to check if a CLOSID has dirty RMID
> values. This behaviour is enabled by a kconfig option selected by the
> architecture, which avoids a pointless search for x86.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h |  1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c  | 31
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 18 +++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index c8c46fe088be..faec12025a58 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -519,6 +519,7 @@ int rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_create(struct rdtgroup
> *rdtgrp);  void rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_remove(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
> struct rdt_domain *get_domain_from_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r);  int
> closids_supported(void);
> +bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid);
>  void closid_free(int closid);
>  int alloc_rmid(u32 closid);
>  void free_rmid(u32 closid, u32 rmid);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 59da256a77fe..99854ef4dee4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -320,6 +320,37 @@ static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32
> closid)
>  	return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * resctrl_closid_is_dirty - Determine if clean RMID can be allocate for this
> + *                           CLOSID.
> + * @closid: The CLOSID that is being queried.
> + *
> + * MPAM's equivalent of RMID are per-CLOSID, meaning a freshly allocate
> +CLOSID
> + * may not be able to allocate clean RMID. To avoid this the allocator
> +will
> + * only return clean CLOSID.
> + */
> +bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid) {
> +	struct rmid_entry *entry;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx(); i++) {
> +		entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
> +		if (entry->closid != closid)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (entry->busy)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * As of now the RMIDs allocation is the same in each domain.
>   * However we keep track of which packages the RMIDs diff --git
> a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index ac88610a6946..59f33adcf6f8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ void rdt_last_cmd_printf(const char *fmt, ...)
>   * - Our choices on how to configure each resource become progressively
> more
>   *   limited as the number of resources grows.
>   */
> -static int closid_free_map;
> +static unsigned long closid_free_map;
>  static int closid_free_map_len;
> 
>  int closids_supported(void)
> @@ -119,14 +119,18 @@ static void closid_init(void)
> 
>  static int closid_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	u32 closid = ffs(closid_free_map);
> +	u32 closid;
> 
> -	if (closid == 0)
> -		return -ENOSPC;
> -	closid--;
> -	closid_free_map &= ~(1 << closid);
> +	for_each_set_bit(closid, &closid_free_map, closid_free_map_len) {
> +		if
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) &&
> +		    resctrl_closid_is_dirty(closid))

IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) is redundant here,
since it is also at the beginning of function resctrl_closid_is_dirty(closid).

Best regards,
Shaopeng Tan

> +			continue;
> 
> -	return closid;
> +		clear_bit(closid, &closid_free_map);
> +		return closid;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOSPC;
>  }
> 
>  void closid_free(int closid)
> --
> 2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21 13:11 [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/18] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2022-10-31 14:42   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-25  4:07   ` haoxin
2023-01-06  2:57   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2023-01-10 18:01       ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-01-06  3:12   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/18] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-01-06  3:23   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/18] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/18] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID James Morse
2022-11-08 15:57   ` Shawn Wang
2022-11-09 17:02     ` James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) [this message]
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/18] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2022-11-18 15:49   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 08/18] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 09/18] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 10/18] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 11/18] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 12/18] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 13/18] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2022-11-10 10:51   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:22     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2022-10-31 14:21   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-09 17:18     ` James Morse
2022-11-01  8:01 ` [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-09 17:21   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TYAPR01MB633047FDDF32B4A2CB5431B18B019@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®