mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com" 
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"carl@os.amperecomputing.com" <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"lcherian@marvell.com" <lcherian@marvell.com>,
	"bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com" <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"xingxin.hx@openanolis.org" <xingxin.hx@openanolis.org>,
	"baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"peternewman@google.com" <peternewman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:21:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ced8f472-c719-d604-5f43-9b3316ec0a95@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB633047FDDF32B4A2CB5431B18B019@TYAPR01MB6330.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

Hello,

On 10/11/2022 10:50, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Hi James
> 
>> MPAM's PMG bits extend its PARTID space, meaning the same PMG value can
>> be used for different control groups.
>>
>> This means once a CLOSID is allocated, all its monitoring ids may still be dirty,
>> and held in limbo.
>>
>> Add a helper to allow the CLOSID allocator to check if a CLOSID has dirty RMID
>> values. This behaviour is enabled by a kconfig option selected by the
>> architecture, which avoids a pointless search for x86.
>>


>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 59da256a77fe..99854ef4dee4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -320,6 +320,37 @@ static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32

>> +bool resctrl_closid_is_dirty(u32 closid) {
>> +	struct rmid_entry *entry;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>> +
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID))
>> +		return false;


>> a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index ac88610a6946..59f33adcf6f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -119,14 +119,18 @@ static void closid_init(void)
>>
>>  static int closid_alloc(void)
>>  {
>> -	u32 closid = ffs(closid_free_map);
>> +	u32 closid;
>>
>> -	if (closid == 0)
>> -		return -ENOSPC;
>> -	closid--;
>> -	closid_free_map &= ~(1 << closid);
>> +	for_each_set_bit(closid, &closid_free_map, closid_free_map_len) {
>> +		if
>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) &&
>> +		    resctrl_closid_is_dirty(closid))


> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID) is redundant here,
> since it is also at the beginning of function resctrl_closid_is_dirty(closid).

This is true. I included it because resctrl_closid_is_dirty() is in a different
compilation unit, so the compiler can't know it does nothing if that config option isn't
enabled. This avoided a pointless call to a function that does nothing. But you're right
it would be more readable without it, and creating a control group is hardly a performance
critical path. I'll remove it.


Thanks,

James

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21 13:11 [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 01/18] x86/resctrl: Track the closid with the rmid James Morse
2022-10-31 14:42   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-25  4:07   ` haoxin
2023-01-06  2:57   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2023-01-10 18:01       ` Yu, Fenghua
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index James Morse
2023-01-06  3:12   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 03/18] x86/resctrl: Create helper for RMID allocation and mondata dir creation James Morse
2023-01-06  3:23   ` Yu, Fenghua
2023-01-10 17:57     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 04/18] x86/resctrl: Move rmid allocation out of mkdir_rdt_prepare() James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 05/18] x86/resctrl: Allow RMID allocation to be scoped by CLOSID James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 06/18] x86/resctrl: Allow the allocator to check if a CLOSID can allocate clean RMID James Morse
2022-11-08 15:57   ` Shawn Wang
2022-11-09 17:02     ` James Morse
2022-11-10 10:50   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse [this message]
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 07/18] x86/resctrl: Move CLOSID/RMID matching and setting to use helpers James Morse
2022-11-18 15:49   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-24 14:21     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 08/18] x86/resctrl: Queue mon_event_read() instead of sending an IPI James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 09/18] x86/resctrl: Allow resctrl_arch_rmid_read() to sleep James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 10/18] x86/resctrl: Allow arch to allocate memory needed in resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 11/18] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_mounted checks explicit James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 12/18] x86/resctrl: Move alloc/mon static keys into helpers James Morse
2022-10-21 13:11 ` [PATCH 13/18] x86/resctrl: Make rdt_enable_key the arch's decision to switch James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86/resctrl: Add helpers for system wide mon/alloc capable James Morse
2022-11-10 10:51   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-24 14:22     ` James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86/resctrl: Allow overflow/limbo handlers to be scheduled on any-but cpu James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] x86/resctrl: Add cpu offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-10-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] x86/resctrl: Separate arch and fs resctrl locks James Morse
2022-10-31 14:21   ` Peter Newman
2022-11-09 17:18     ` James Morse
2022-11-01  8:01 ` [PATCH 00/18] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2022-11-09 17:21   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ced8f472-c719-d604-5f43-9b3316ec0a95@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®