* Re: [PATCH block-5.17] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if iocost or iolatency is active
[not found] ` <107965ce-a29a-b5f4-ef87-63b753380891@kernel.dk>
@ 2022-03-14 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2022-03-14 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block, kernel-team, linux-kernel, Josef Bacik
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:12:34PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > * Add WARN_ON_ONCE() on blkg mismatch in ioc_rqos_merge() so that we can
> > easily notice similar failures in the future.
> >
> > * Make sure iocost enable/disable transitions only happen when iocost is
> > actually enabled / disabled.
>
> Is there really no better way to do this than add a lot of expensive
> checks to the fast path?
>
> Even just inverting the checks so that
>
> if (req->bio->bi_blkg != bio->bi_blkg)
> ...
>
> is checked first would seem a lot saner.
>
> In any case, since this isn't a new regression, I'd feel a lot better
> deferring it to 5.18.
As discussed, the only risk of removing the disable/enable switch and always
testing is ruining some merges for cases where blkcg is enabled but no
control is applied, which shouldn't be a big problem. I'll redo the patch.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 for-5.18/block] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if blkcg is enabled
[not found] <Yi71WZ3O9/YViHSb@slm.duckdns.org>
[not found] ` <107965ce-a29a-b5f4-ef87-63b753380891@kernel.dk>
@ 2022-03-14 23:50 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-15 0:30 ` [PATCH v3 " Tejun Heo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2022-03-14 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block, kernel-team, linux-kernel, Josef Bacik
blk-iocost and iolatency are cgroup aware rq-qos policies but they didn't
disable merges across different cgroups. This obviously can lead to
accounting and control errors but more importantly to priority inversions -
e.g. an IO which belongs to a higher priority cgroup or IO class may end up
getting throttled incorrectly because it gets merged to an IO issued from a
low priority cgroup.
Fix it by adding blk_cgroup_mergeable() which is called from merge paths and
rejects cross-cgroup and cross-issue_as_root merges.
v2: Dropped conditional enabling. Always disallow cross-blkcg merges for
simpilcity. While this may spuriously prevent some merges for cases
where blkcg is enabled but no control is applied, that is a small cross
section.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: d70675121546 ("block: introduce blk-iolatency io controller")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
block/blk-merge.c | 11 +++++++++++
include/linux/blk-cgroup.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/blk-integrity.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/part_stat.h>
+#include <linux/blk-cgroup.h>
#include <trace/events/block.h>
@@ -600,6 +601,9 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_ma
static inline int ll_new_hw_segment(struct request *req, struct bio *bio,
unsigned int nr_phys_segs)
{
+ if (!blk_cgroup_mergeable(req, bio))
+ goto no_merge;
+
if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(req->q, req, bio) == false)
goto no_merge;
@@ -696,6 +700,9 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct r
if (total_phys_segments > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req))
return 0;
+ if (!blk_cgroup_mergeable(req, next->bio))
+ return 0;
+
if (blk_integrity_merge_rq(q, req, next) == false)
return 0;
@@ -904,6 +911,10 @@ bool blk_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq,
if (bio_data_dir(bio) != rq_data_dir(rq))
return false;
+ /* don't merge across cgroup boundaries */
+ if (!blk_cgroup_mergeable(rq, bio))
+ return false;
+
/* only merge integrity protected bio into ditto rq */
if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(rq->q, rq, bio) == false)
return false;
--- a/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-cgroup.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
@@ -604,6 +605,21 @@ static inline void blkcg_clear_delay(str
atomic_dec(&blkg->blkcg->css.cgroup->congestion_count);
}
+/**
+ * blk_cgroup_mergeable - Determine whether to allow or disallow merges
+ * @rq: request to merge into
+ * @bio: bio to merge
+ *
+ * @bio and @rq should belong to the same cgroup and their issue_as_root should
+ * match. The latter is necessary as we don't want to throttle e.g. a metadata
+ * update because it happens to be next to a regular IO.
+ */
+static inline bool blk_cgroup_mergeable(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ return rq->bio->bi_blkg == bio->bi_blkg &&
+ bio_issue_as_root_blkg(rq->bio) == bio_issue_as_root_blkg(bio);
+}
+
void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio);
void blkcg_add_delay(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, u64 now, u64 delta);
void blkcg_schedule_throttle(struct request_queue *q, bool use_memdelay);
@@ -659,6 +675,7 @@ static inline void blkg_put(struct blkcg
static inline bool blkcg_punt_bio_submit(struct bio *bio) { return false; }
static inline void blkcg_bio_issue_init(struct bio *bio) { }
static inline void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio) { }
+static inline bool blk_cgroup_mergeable(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio) { return true; }
#define blk_queue_for_each_rl(rl, q) \
for ((rl) = &(q)->root_rl; (rl); (rl) = NULL)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 for-5.18/block] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if blkcg is enabled
2022-03-14 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 for-5.18/block] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if blkcg is enabled Tejun Heo
@ 2022-03-15 0:30 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-15 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2022-03-15 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block, kernel-team, linux-kernel, Josef Bacik
blk-iocost and iolatency are cgroup aware rq-qos policies but they didn't
disable merges across different cgroups. This obviously can lead to
accounting and control errors but more importantly to priority inversions -
e.g. an IO which belongs to a higher priority cgroup or IO class may end up
getting throttled incorrectly because it gets merged to an IO issued from a
low priority cgroup.
Fix it by adding blk_cgroup_mergeable() which is called from merge paths and
rejects cross-cgroup and cross-issue_as_root merges.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: d70675121546 ("block: introduce blk-iolatency io controller")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
v2 was tagged for-5.18/block but was still based on block-for-5.17. Refresh
on top of for-5.18/block. My apologies about all the messiness.
v3: Actually rebased on top of block/for-5.18.
v2: Dropped conditional enabling. Always disallow cross-blkcg merges for
simpilcity. While this may spuriously prevent some merges for cases
where blkcg is enabled but no control is applied, that is a small cross
section.
block/blk-cgroup.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
block/blk-merge.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.h b/block/blk-cgroup.h
index 3e91803c4a555..47e1e38390c96 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.h
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/blk-cgroup.h>
+#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
/* percpu_counter batch for blkg_[rw]stats, per-cpu drift doesn't matter */
#define BLKG_STAT_CPU_BATCH (INT_MAX / 2)
@@ -428,6 +429,21 @@ static inline void blkcg_clear_delay(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
atomic_dec(&blkg->blkcg->css.cgroup->congestion_count);
}
+/**
+ * blk_cgroup_mergeable - Determine whether to allow or disallow merges
+ * @rq: request to merge into
+ * @bio: bio to merge
+ *
+ * @bio and @rq should belong to the same cgroup and their issue_as_root should
+ * match. The latter is necessary as we don't want to throttle e.g. a metadata
+ * update because it happens to be next to a regular IO.
+ */
+static inline bool blk_cgroup_mergeable(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
+{
+ return rq->bio->bi_blkg == bio->bi_blkg &&
+ bio_issue_as_root_blkg(rq->bio) == bio_issue_as_root_blkg(bio);
+}
+
void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio);
void blkcg_add_delay(struct blkcg_gq *blkg, u64 now, u64 delta);
#else /* CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP */
@@ -467,6 +483,7 @@ static inline void blkg_put(struct blkcg_gq *blkg) { }
static inline bool blkcg_punt_bio_submit(struct bio *bio) { return false; }
static inline void blkcg_bio_issue_init(struct bio *bio) { }
static inline void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio) { }
+static inline bool blk_cgroup_mergeable(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio) { return true; }
#define blk_queue_for_each_rl(rl, q) \
for ((rl) = &(q)->root_rl; (rl); (rl) = NULL)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 8d8177f71ebdb..ea6968313b4a8 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/blk-integrity.h>
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/part_stat.h>
+#include <linux/blk-cgroup.h>
#include <trace/events/block.h>
@@ -598,6 +599,9 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_rq_get_max_sectors(struct request *rq,
static inline int ll_new_hw_segment(struct request *req, struct bio *bio,
unsigned int nr_phys_segs)
{
+ if (!blk_cgroup_mergeable(req, bio))
+ goto no_merge;
+
if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(req->q, req, bio) == false)
goto no_merge;
@@ -694,6 +698,9 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
if (total_phys_segments > blk_rq_get_max_segments(req))
return 0;
+ if (!blk_cgroup_mergeable(req, next->bio))
+ return 0;
+
if (blk_integrity_merge_rq(q, req, next) == false)
return 0;
@@ -902,6 +909,10 @@ bool blk_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
if (bio_data_dir(bio) != rq_data_dir(rq))
return false;
+ /* don't merge across cgroup boundaries */
+ if (!blk_cgroup_mergeable(rq, bio))
+ return false;
+
/* only merge integrity protected bio into ditto rq */
if (blk_integrity_merge_bio(rq->q, rq, bio) == false)
return false;
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 for-5.18/block] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if blkcg is enabled
2022-03-15 0:30 ` [PATCH v3 " Tejun Heo
@ 2022-03-15 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-03-15 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Josef Bacik, linux-kernel, linux-block, kernel-team
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:30:11 -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> blk-iocost and iolatency are cgroup aware rq-qos policies but they didn't
> disable merges across different cgroups. This obviously can lead to
> accounting and control errors but more importantly to priority inversions -
> e.g. an IO which belongs to a higher priority cgroup or IO class may end up
> getting throttled incorrectly because it gets merged to an IO issued from a
> low priority cgroup.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if blkcg is enabled
commit: 6b2b04590b51aa4cf395fcd185ce439cab5961dc
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-15 1:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Yi71WZ3O9/YViHSb@slm.duckdns.org>
[not found] ` <107965ce-a29a-b5f4-ef87-63b753380891@kernel.dk>
2022-03-14 20:41 ` [PATCH block-5.17] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if iocost or iolatency is active Tejun Heo
2022-03-14 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 for-5.18/block] block: don't merge across cgroup boundaries if blkcg is enabled Tejun Heo
2022-03-15 0:30 ` [PATCH v3 " Tejun Heo
2022-03-15 1:15 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®