From: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/19] i2c: mux: pca954x: make use of raw_spinlock variants
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:21:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5015f6a7ecc2f84e9026c309ca2753c0cb3a1fa.1489015238.git.julia@ni.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1489015238.git.julia@ni.com>
The pca954x i2c mux driver currently implements an irq_chip for handling
interrupts; due to how irq_chip handling is done, it's necessary for the
irq_chip methods to be invoked from hardirq context, even on a a
real-time kernel. Because the spinlock_t type becomes a "sleeping"
spinlock w/ RT kernels, it is not suitable to be used with irq_chips.
A quick audit of the operations under the lock reveal that they do only
minimal, bounded work, and are therefore safe to do under a raw spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
index dfc1c0e37c40..15dfc1648716 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct pca954x {
struct irq_domain *irq;
unsigned int irq_mask;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
};
/* Provide specs for the PCA954x types we know about */
@@ -264,13 +264,13 @@ static void pca954x_irq_mask(struct irq_data *idata)
unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
data->irq_mask &= ~BIT(pos);
if (!data->irq_mask)
disable_irq(data->client->irq);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
}
static void pca954x_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *idata)
@@ -279,13 +279,13 @@ static void pca954x_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *idata)
unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
if (!data->irq_mask)
enable_irq(data->client->irq);
data->irq_mask |= BIT(pos);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
}
static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type)
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc)
if (!data->chip->has_irq || client->irq <= 0)
return 0;
- spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
data->irq = irq_domain_add_linear(client->dev.of_node,
data->chip->nchans,
--
2.11.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 16:21 [PATCH 00/19] fixup usage of non-raw spinlocks in irqchips Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 01/19] Coccinelle: locks: identify callers of spin_lock{,_irq,_irqsave}() in irqchip implementations Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 20:15 ` Julia Lawall
2017-03-09 21:37 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 02/19] gpio: altera: make use of raw_spinlock variants Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 9:53 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 03/19] alpha: marvel: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-12 2:58 ` kbuild test robot
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 04/19] powerpc: mpc52xx_gpt: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 05/19] gpio: 104-dio-48e: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 18:35 ` William Breathitt Gray
2017-03-15 9:54 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 06/19] gpio: ath79: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-13 19:51 ` Alban
2017-03-15 9:59 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 07/19] gpio: bcm-kona: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-10 17:28 ` Ray Jui
2017-03-10 19:35 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 9:57 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-15 9:56 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 08/19] gpio: etraxfs: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:00 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 09/19] gpio: pl061: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:01 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 10/19] gpio: ws16c48: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 18:36 ` William Breathitt Gray
2017-03-15 10:02 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` [PATCH 11/19] gpio: zx: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:03 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:21 ` Julia Cartwright [this message]
2017-03-16 19:38 ` [PATCH 12/19] i2c: mux: pca954x: " Peter Rosin
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 13/19] mfd: asic3: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 14/19] mfd: t7l66xb: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 11:17 ` Lee Jones
2017-03-15 19:07 ` Julia Cartwright
2017-03-16 9:22 ` Lee Jones
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 15/19] mfd: tc6393xb: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 16/19] pinctrl: bcm: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:11 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 17/19] pinctrl: amd: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:12 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 18/19] pinctrl: sirf: atlas7: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:13 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-09 16:22 ` [PATCH 19/19] pinctrl: sunxi: " Julia Cartwright
2017-03-15 10:14 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-15 9:51 ` [PATCH 00/19] fixup usage of non-raw spinlocks in irqchips Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5015f6a7ecc2f84e9026c309ca2753c0cb3a1fa.1489015238.git.julia@ni.com \
--to=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®