* ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20
@ 2007-07-17 11:33 Ni@m
2007-07-17 17:00 ` markus reichelt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ni@m @ 2007-07-17 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Hi!
I'm not happy with 2.6.22 stability so I want to stay on 2.6.20.
Does -ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 make the same job? Or it's
better to backport -ck1 for 2.6.22 to 2.6.20?
Thanks for your time!
Best regards,
Dmitry Milinevsky.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20
2007-07-17 11:33 ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 Ni@m
@ 2007-07-17 17:00 ` markus reichelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: markus reichelt @ 2007-07-17 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]
* "Ni@m" <niam.niam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does -ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 make the same job? Or it's
> better to backport -ck1 for 2.6.22 to 2.6.20?
fyi, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.ck/7850
--
left blank, right bald
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-17 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-17 11:33 ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 Ni@m
2007-07-17 17:00 ` markus reichelt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®