From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com,
john.allen@amd.com, weijiang.yang@intel.com,
minipli@grsecurity.net, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 01/23] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to show that they emulate guest accesses
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:19:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIkQvhGhRKisonmh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIgZjW2PZEdR/DYr@intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 03:31:41PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> >> /* Set L1 segment info according to Intel SDM
> >> 27.5.2 Loading Host Segment and Descriptor-Table Registers */
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> index 7543dac7ae70..11d84075cd14 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >> @@ -1929,33 +1929,35 @@ static int kvm_get_msr_ignored_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> __kvm_get_msr);
> >> }
> >> -int kvm_get_msr_with_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data)
> >> +int kvm_emulate_msr_read_with_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index,
> >> + u64 *data)
> >
> >I think the extra new line doesn't improve readability, but it's the
> >maintainer's call.
> >
>
> Sure. Seems "let it poke out" is Sean's preference. I saw he made similar
> requests several times. e.g.,
Depends on the situation. I'd probably mentally flip a coin in this case.
But what I'd actually do here is choose names that are (a) less verbose and (b)
capture the relationship between the APIs. Instead of:
int kvm_emulate_msr_read_with_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data);
int kvm_emulate_msr_write_with_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data);
int kvm_emulate_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data);
int kvm_emulate_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data);
rename to:
int kvm_emulate_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data);
int kvm_emulate_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data);
int __kvm_emulate_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data);
int __kvm_emulate_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data);
And then we can do a follow-up patch to solidify the relationship:
--
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:13:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Use double-underscore read/write MSR helpers as
appropriate
Use the double-underscore helpers for emulating MSR reads and writes in
he no-underscore versions to better capture the relationship between the
two sets of APIs (the double-underscore versions don't honor userspace MSR
filters).
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 09b106a5afdf..65c787bcfe8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1932,11 +1932,24 @@ static int kvm_get_msr_ignored_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
__kvm_get_msr);
}
+int __kvm_emulate_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data)
+{
+ return kvm_get_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, false);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_msr_read);
+
+int __kvm_emulate_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data)
+{
+ return kvm_set_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, false);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_msr_write);
+
int kvm_emulate_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data)
{
if (!kvm_msr_allowed(vcpu, index, KVM_MSR_FILTER_READ))
return KVM_MSR_RET_FILTERED;
- return kvm_get_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, false);
+
+ return __kvm_emulate_msr_read(vcpu, index, data);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_msr_read);
@@ -1944,21 +1957,11 @@ int kvm_emulate_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data)
{
if (!kvm_msr_allowed(vcpu, index, KVM_MSR_FILTER_WRITE))
return KVM_MSR_RET_FILTERED;
- return kvm_set_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, false);
+
+ return __kvm_emulate_msr_write(vcpu, index, data);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_msr_write);
-int __kvm_emulate_msr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data)
-{
- return kvm_get_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, false);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_msr_read);
-
-int __kvm_emulate_msr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 data)
-{
- return kvm_set_msr_ignored_check(vcpu, index, data, false);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_msr_write);
static void complete_userspace_rdmsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
base-commit: 1877e7b0749cbaa2d2ba4056eeda93adb373f7d4
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-04 8:49 [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CET Virtualization Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_{g,s}et_msr()* to show that they emulate guest accesses Chao Gao
2025-07-24 11:37 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-24 13:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-28 22:31 ` Xin Li
2025-07-29 0:45 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-29 18:19 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] KVM: x86: Add kvm_msr_{read,write}() helpers Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] KVM: x86: Manually clear MPX state only on INIT Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] KVM: x86: Zero XSTATE components on INIT by iterating over supported features Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG uAPIs support Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] KVM: x86: Report XSS as to-be-saved if there are supported features Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on write to guest MSR_IA32_XSS Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] KVM: x86: Initialize kvm_caps.supported_xss Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] KVM: x86: Load guest FPU state when access XSAVE-managed MSRs Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] KVM: x86: Add fault checks for guest CR4.CET setting Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] KVM: x86: Report KVM supported CET MSRs as to-be-saved Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] KVM: VMX: Introduce CET VMCS fields and control bits Chao Gao
2025-07-28 22:53 ` Xin Li
2025-07-29 1:30 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-29 2:17 ` Xin Li
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] KVM: x86: Enable guest SSP read/write interface with new uAPIs Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] KVM: VMX: Emulate read and write to CET MSRs Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] KVM: x86: Save and reload SSP to/from SMRAM Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] KVM: VMX: Set up interception for CET MSRs Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] KVM: VMX: Set host constant supervisor states to VMCS fields Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] KVM: x86: Don't emulate instructions guarded by CET Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] KVM: x86: Enable CET virtualization for VMX and advertise to userspace Chao Gao
2025-07-21 15:51 ` Mathias Krause
2025-07-21 17:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-22 5:49 ` Mathias Krause
2025-07-22 14:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-22 21:25 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: VMX: Make CR4.CET a guest owned bit Mathias Krause
2025-07-23 6:24 ` Chao Gao
2025-08-06 20:58 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] KVM: x86: Enable CET virtualization for VMX and advertise to userspace John Allen
2025-08-06 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] KVM: nVMX: Virtualize NO_HW_ERROR_CODE_CC for L1 event injection to L2 Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] KVM: nVMX: Enable CET support for nested guest Chao Gao
2025-07-28 6:30 ` Xin Li
2025-07-28 8:42 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] KVM: nVMX: Add consistency checks for CR0.WP and CR4.CET Chao Gao
2025-07-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] KVM: nVMX: Add consistency checks for CET states Chao Gao
2025-07-06 16:51 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Enable CET Virtualization Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-07 1:32 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-16 20:36 ` John Allen
2025-07-17 7:00 ` Mathias Krause
2025-07-17 7:57 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-21 18:08 ` John Allen
2025-07-21 15:35 ` Mathias Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIkQvhGhRKisonmh@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®