Re: [PATCH v11 21/23] KVM: nVMX: Enable CET support for nested guest

[Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>]

> @@ -2515,6 +2537,30 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static inline void cet_vmcs_fields_get(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *ssp,
> +				       u64 *s_cet, u64 *ssp_tbl)
> +{
> +	if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
> +		*ssp = vmcs_readl(GUEST_SSP);
> +		*ssp_tbl = vmcs_readl(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE);
> +	}
> +	if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT) ||
> +	    guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> +		*s_cet = vmcs_readl(GUEST_S_CET);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void cet_vmcs_fields_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 ssp,
> +				       u64 s_cet, u64 ssp_tbl)
> +{
> +	if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
> +		vmcs_writel(GUEST_SSP, ssp);
> +		vmcs_writel(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE, ssp_tbl);
> +	}
> +	if (guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT) ||
> +	    guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> +		vmcs_writel(GUEST_S_CET, s_cet);
> +}
> +
>   static void prepare_vmcs02_rare(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>   {
>   	struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *hv_evmcs = nested_vmx_evmcs(vmx);


The order of the arguments is a bit of weird to me, I would move s_cet
before ssp.  Then it is consistent with the order in
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250704085027.182163-13-chao.gao@intel.com/


> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,9 @@ struct nested_vmx {
>   	 */
>   	u64 pre_vmenter_debugctl;
>   	u64 pre_vmenter_bndcfgs;
> +	u64 pre_vmenter_ssp;
> +	u64 pre_vmenter_s_cet;
> +	u64 pre_vmenter_ssp_tbl;
>   
>   	/* to migrate it to L1 if L2 writes to L1's CR8 directly */
>   	int l1_tpr_threshold;

Same here.