From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: <dave.hansen@intel.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <kas@kernel.org>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>, <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<seanjc@google.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<reinette.chatre@intel.com>, <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
<nik.borisov@suse.com>, <sagis@google.com>,
"Farrah Chen" <farrah.chen@intel.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 16:30:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIx7Qlpi1Y/VsRVY@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c29f7a3348a95f687c83ac965ebc92ff5f253e87.1753679792.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 12:28:41AM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
>On TDX platforms, during kexec, the kernel needs to make sure there are
>no dirty cachelines of TDX private memory before booting to the new
>kernel to avoid silent memory corruption to the new kernel.
>
>During kexec, the kexec-ing CPU firstly invokes native_stop_other_cpus()
>to stop all remote CPUs before booting to the new kernel. The remote
>CPUs will then execute stop_this_cpu() to stop themselves.
>
>The kernel has a percpu boolean to indicate whether the cache of a CPU
>may be in incoherent state. In stop_this_cpu(), the kernel does WBINVD
>if that percpu boolean is true.
>
>TDX turns on that percpu boolean on a CPU when the kernel does SEAMCALL.
>This makes sure the caches will be flushed during kexec.
>
>However, the native_stop_other_cpus() and stop_this_cpu() have a "race"
>which is extremely rare to happen but could cause the system to hang.
>
>Specifically, the native_stop_other_cpus() firstly sends normal reboot
>IPI to remote CPUs and waits one second for them to stop. If that times
>out, native_stop_other_cpus() then sends NMIs to remote CPUs to stop
>them.
>
>The aforementioned race happens when NMIs are sent. Doing WBINVD in
>stop_this_cpu() makes each CPU take longer time to stop and increases
>the chance of the race happening.
>
>Explicitly flush cache in tdx_disable_virtualization_cpu() after which
>no more TDX activity can happen on this cpu. This moves the WBINVD to
>an earlier stage than stop_this_cpus(), avoiding a possibly lengthy
>operation at a time where it could cause this race.
>
>Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
>Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
>Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Flushing cache after disabling virtualization looks clean. So,
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 12:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] TDX host: kexec/kdump support Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function parameters Kai Huang
2025-08-06 6:53 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-06 13:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-08-06 22:29 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control WBINVD during kexec Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] x86/virt/tdx: Mark memory cache state incoherent when making SEAMCALL Kai Huang
2025-08-01 8:23 ` Chao Gao
2025-08-04 12:47 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-12 0:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-12 1:32 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-12 1:34 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-12 2:03 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-14 0:09 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] x86/kexec: Disable kexec/kdump on platforms with TDX partial write erratum Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] x86/virt/tdx: Remove the !KEXEC_CORE dependency Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/virt/tdx: Update the kexec section in the TDX documentation Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs Kai Huang
2025-08-01 8:30 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2025-08-04 12:48 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIx7Qlpi1Y/VsRVY@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®