From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "ashish.kalra@amd.com" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"sagis@google.com" <sagis@google.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"nik.borisov@suse.com" <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function parameters
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 06:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3c5417d5aaf0b02fb67d834f457f21529296615.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48b3b8dc2ece4095d29f21a439664c0302f3c979.1753679792.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
On Tue, 2025-07-29 at 00:28 +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> During kexec, the kernel jumps to the new kernel in relocate_kernel(),
> which is implemented in assembly and both 32-bit and 64-bit have their
> own version.
>
> Currently, for both 32-bit and 64-bit, the last two parameters of the
> relocate_kernel() are both 'unsigned int' but actually they only convey
> a boolean, i.e., one bit information. The 'unsigned int' has enough
> space to carry two bits information therefore there's no need to pass
> the two booleans in two separate 'unsigned int'.
>
> Consolidate the last two function parameters of relocate_kernel() into a
> single 'unsigned int' and pass flags instead.
>
> Only consolidate the 64-bit version albeit the similar optimization can
> be done for the 32-bit version too. Don't bother changing the 32-bit
> version while it is working (since assembly code change is required).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ACTIVE -> RELOC_KERNEL_HOST_MEM_ENC_ACTIVE
> (Tom)
> - Add a comment to explain only RELOC_KERNEL_PRESERVE_CONTEXT is
> restored after jumping back from peer kernel for preserved_context
> kexec (pointed out by Tom).
> - Use testb instead of testq when comparing the flag with R11 to save
> 3 bytes (Hpa).
>
>
Hi Tom,
Wondering do you have more comments? Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 12:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] TDX host: kexec/kdump support Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] x86/kexec: Consolidate relocate_kernel() function parameters Kai Huang
2025-08-06 6:53 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2025-08-06 13:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-08-06 22:29 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] x86/sme: Use percpu boolean to control WBINVD during kexec Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] x86/virt/tdx: Mark memory cache state incoherent when making SEAMCALL Kai Huang
2025-08-01 8:23 ` Chao Gao
2025-08-04 12:47 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-12 0:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-12 1:32 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-12 1:34 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-08-12 2:03 ` Huang, Kai
2025-08-14 0:09 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] x86/kexec: Disable kexec/kdump on platforms with TDX partial write erratum Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] x86/virt/tdx: Remove the !KEXEC_CORE dependency Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/virt/tdx: Update the kexec section in the TDX documentation Kai Huang
2025-07-28 12:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs Kai Huang
2025-08-01 8:30 ` Chao Gao
2025-08-04 12:48 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3c5417d5aaf0b02fb67d834f457f21529296615.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®