From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
yang.yang@vivo.com, osandov@fb.com, paolo.valente@linaro.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] block/elevator: choose none elevator for high IO concurrency ability disk
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:50:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac5aa72f-9944-4436-bed3-43e4e4e97f5e@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217024047.1091893-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
On 12/16/24 6:40 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>
> The maximal default nr_requests is 256, and if disk can handle more than
> 256 requests concurrently, use elevator in this case is useless, on the
> one hand it limits the number of requests to 256, on the other hand,
> it can't merge or sort IO because requests are dispatched to disk
> immediately and the elevator is just empty.
>
> For example, for nvme megaraid with 512 queue_depth by default, we have
> to change default elevator to none, otherwise deadline will lose a lot of
> performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> block/elevator.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index 7c3ba80e5ff4..4cce1e7c47d5 100644
> --- a/block/elevator.c
> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -568,6 +568,17 @@ static struct elevator_type *elevator_get_default(struct request_queue *q)
> !blk_mq_is_shared_tags(q->tag_set->flags))
> return NULL;
>
> + /*
> + * If nr_queues will be less than disk ability, requests will be
> + * dispatched to disk immediately, it's useless to use elevator. User
> + * should set a bigger nr_requests or limit disk ability manually if
> + * they really want to use elevator.
> + */
> + if (q->queue_depth && q->queue_depth >= BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ * 2)
> + return NULL;
> + if (!q->queue_depth && q->tag_set->queue_depth >= BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ * 2)
> + return NULL;
> +
> return elevator_find_get("mq-deadline");
> }
Shouldn't this patch be submitted separately since it is independent of
the rest of the patches in this series?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 2:40 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] lib/sbitmap: fix shallow_depth tag allocation Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 2:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] block/mq-deadline: Revert "block/mq-deadline: Fix the tag reservation code" Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 21:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-18 1:16 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 2:40 ` [PATCH v2 RFC 2/4] lib/sbitmap: fix shallow_depth tag allocation Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 21:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-18 1:18 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 2:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] block/elevator: choose none elevator for high IO concurrency ability disk Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 21:50 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-12-18 1:28 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 2:40 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] block/mq-deadline: introduce min_async_depth Yu Kuai
2024-12-17 22:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-18 1:12 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-18 1:14 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-18 18:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-19 1:21 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-19 19:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-20 6:08 ` Yu Kuai
2024-12-18 18:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-12-19 1:54 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac5aa72f-9944-4436-bed3-43e4e4e97f5e@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=yang.yang@vivo.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®