Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[전민식]

Hi Keith, hch

Gentle ping for review on [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on 
host path error.

I agree with your propsed approach. Should I send a new version(v6) 
based on that?

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[Keith Busch]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 05:41:07PM +0900, 전민식 wrote:
> Hi Keith, hch
> 
> Gentle ping for review on [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on 
> host path error.
> 
> I agree with your propsed approach. Should I send a new version(v6) 
> based on that?

Yes, I hadn't seen an updated patch yet so was just waiting for that.
Or was this one on me to submit?

Re: [PATCH v4] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[hch]

> -	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> +	if (nvme_req(req)->status != NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
> +		trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> +

Please add a comment here explaining why we need the check.

Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: Add nvme_setup_cmd to host_path_error

[Keith Busch]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 11:37:44AM -0700, Justin Tee wrote:
> > - After
> > nvme_setup_cmd: \
> > nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, nsid=0, flags=0x0, meta=0x0, \
> > cmd=(nvme_admin_identify cns=1, ctrlid=0)
> > nvme_complete_rq: \
> > nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, res=0x0, retries=0, flags=0x2, status=0x370
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > index 766e9cc4ffca..378d28b2c971 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_batch_req);
> > blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req)
> > {
> >         nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
> > +       nvme_setup_cmd(req->q->queuedata, req);
> >         blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
> >         nvme_complete_rq(req);
> >         return BLK_STS_OK;
> 
> Since trace_nvme_complete_rq is printing only cmdid to help identify
> the command, why not define a new TRACE_EVENT(nvme_host_path_error,
> ...) in trace.h instead?

Why are we even tracing the completion? I agree the completion without a
submission is confusing, but why don't we just skip tracing the
completion in this condition? The idea for these trace events was to
match up commands dispatched to hardware with the hardware's
posted response, so I'm not sure what value we get by synthesizing both
sides of the events.

[PATCH] nvme: Move nvme_setup_cmd before hot_pathing

[전민식]

From e54937be5ca0a2b38fffe6611c360625dc0a8903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:48:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: Move nvme_setup_cmd before hot_pathing

we were checking host_pathing_error before calling nvme_setup_cmd().
This is caused the command setup to be skipped entirely when a pathing
error occurred, making it impossible to trace the nvme command via
trace_cmd nvme_complete_rq().

As a result, when nvme_complete_rq() logged a completion with cmdid=0,
it was impossible to correlate the completion with the nvme command
request.

This patch reorders the logic to first call nvme_setup_cmd(), then
perform the host_pathing_error check.

Co-authored-by: Beomsoo Kim <beomsooo.kim@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Eunsoo Lee <euns212.lee@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Seungcheol Lee <sc108.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/apple.c  | 6 +++---
 drivers/nvme/host/fc.c     | 8 ++++----
 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c    | 8 ++++----
 drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c   | 8 ++++----
 drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c    | 8 ++++----
 drivers/nvme/target/loop.c | 6 +++---
 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c b/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
index ed61b97fde59..2a28c992d024 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/apple.c
@@ -783,13 +783,13 @@ static blk_status_t apple_nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(q->enabled)))
 		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
 
-	if (!nvme_check_ready(&anv->ctrl, req, true))
-		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&anv->ctrl, req);
-
 	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, req);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (!nvme_check_ready(&anv->ctrl, req, true))
+		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&anv->ctrl, req);
+
 	if (blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req)) {
 		ret = apple_nvme_map_data(anv, req, cmnd);
 		if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
index e1bb4707183c..8ea37102a836 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -2762,14 +2762,14 @@ nvme_fc_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	u32 data_len;
 	blk_status_t ret;
 
-	if (ctrl->rport->remoteport.port_state != FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE ||
-	    !nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq, queue_ready))
-		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq);
-
 	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, rq);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (ctrl->rport->remoteport.port_state != FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE ||
+	    !nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq, queue_ready))
+		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq);
+
 	/*
 	 * nvme core doesn't quite treat the rq opaquely. Commands such
 	 * as WRITE ZEROES will return a non-zero rq payload_bytes yet
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index b78ba239c8ea..ad0363f7e681 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -1376,10 +1376,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_prep_rq(struct request *req)
 	iod->meta_total_len = 0;
 	iod->nr_dma_vecs = 0;
 
-	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(req->q->queuedata, req);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	if (blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(req)) {
 		ret = nvme_map_data(req);
 		if (ret)
@@ -1418,6 +1414,10 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	if (unlikely(!test_bit(NVMEQ_ENABLED, &nvmeq->flags)))
 		return BLK_STS_IOERR;
 
+	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(req->q->queuedata, req);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (unlikely(!nvme_check_ready(&dev->ctrl, req, true)))
 		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&dev->ctrl, req);
 
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index 57111139e84f..96248d81237e 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -2005,6 +2005,10 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->tag < 0);
 
+	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, rq);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (!nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq, queue_ready))
 		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq);
 
@@ -2020,10 +2024,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	ib_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sqe->dma,
 			sizeof(struct nvme_command), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 
-	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, rq);
-	if (ret)
-		goto unmap_qe;
-
 	nvme_start_request(rq);
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY) &&
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index 243dab830dc8..1a3640e81b8f 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -2705,10 +2705,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_tcp_setup_cmd_pdu(struct nvme_ns *ns,
 	u8 hdgst = nvme_tcp_hdgst_len(queue), ddgst = 0;
 	blk_status_t ret;
 
-	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, rq);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	req->state = NVME_TCP_SEND_CMD_PDU;
 	req->status = cpu_to_le16(NVME_SC_SUCCESS);
 	req->offset = 0;
@@ -2768,6 +2764,10 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_tcp_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	bool queue_ready = test_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_LIVE, &queue->flags);
 	blk_status_t ret;
 
+	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, rq);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	if (!nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq, queue_ready))
 		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq);
 
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
index 4b3f4f11928d..475b532d08e8 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
@@ -140,13 +140,13 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_loop_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 	bool queue_ready = test_bit(NVME_LOOP_Q_LIVE, &queue->flags);
 	blk_status_t ret;
 
-	if (!nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, req, queue_ready))
-		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, req);
-
 	ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, req);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	if (!nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, req, queue_ready))
+		return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, req);
+
 	nvme_start_request(req);
 	iod->cmd.common.flags |= NVME_CMD_SGL_METABUF;
 	iod->req.port = queue->ctrl->port;
-- 
2.52.0

Re: [PATCH] nvme: Move nvme_setup_cmd before hot_pathing

[Justin Tee]

Hi Minsik,

 > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
 > index e1bb4707183c..8ea37102a836 100644
 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
 > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
 > @@ -2762,14 +2762,14 @@ nvme_fc_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 >         u32 data_len;
 >         blk_status_t ret;
 >
 > -       if (ctrl->rport->remoteport.port_state != FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE ||
 > -           !nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq, queue_ready))
 > -               return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, 
rq);
 > -
 >         ret = nvme_setup_cmd(ns, rq);
 >         if (ret)
 >                 return ret;
 >
 > +       if (ctrl->rport->remoteport.port_state != FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE ||
 > +           !nvme_check_ready(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, rq, queue_ready))
 > +               return nvme_fail_nonready_command(&queue->ctrl->ctrl, 
rq);
 > +

__nvme_check_ready() checks for (nvme_req(req)->flags & 
NVME_REQ_USERCMD).  In nvme_setup_cmd(), nvme_clear_nvme_request() 
clears the nvme_req(req)->flags when RQF_DONTPREP is not set.

Is it possible that this patch would have nvme_setup_cmd() erase a 
nvme_req(req)’s NVME_REQ_USERCMD flag before __nvme_check_ready() is 
called for each respective .queue_rq?

Regards,
Justin Tee

[PATCH v3] nvme: Add nvme_setup_cmd to host_path_error

[전민식]

Hi Justin,


After your feedback, I found a simpler approach.
I've modified the patch to add nvme_setup_cmd() inside 
host_path_error(). I think this patch won't cause side effect.

Please leave a review. Thank you.

- Before
nvme_complete_rq: \
nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=0, res=0x0, retries=0, flags=0x2, status=0x370

- After
nvme_setup_cmd: \
nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, nsid=0, flags=0x0, meta=0x0, \
cmd=(nvme_admin_identify cns=1, ctrlid=0)
nvme_complete_rq: \
nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, res=0x0, retries=0, flags=0x2, status=0x370

Regards,
Minsik Jeon



From 98af885be8314dc9093983c531fc36b454b78e81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:58:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v3] nvme: Add nvme_setup_cmd to host_path_error

we were checking host_pathing_error before calling nvme_setup_cmd().
This is caused the command setup to be skipped entirely when a pathing
error occurred, making it impossible to trace the nvme command via
trace_cmd nvme_complete_rq().

As a result, when nvme_complete_rq() logged a completion with cmdid=0,
it was impossible to correlate the completion with the nvme command
request.

This patch add nvme_setup_cmd() to nvme_host_path_error().

- Before
nvme_complete_rq: \
nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=0, res=0x0, retries=0, flags=0x2, status=0x370

- After
nvme_setup_cmd: \
nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, nsid=0, flags=0x0, meta=0x0, \
cmd=(nvme_admin_identify cns=1, ctrlid=0)
nvme_complete_rq: \
nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, res=0x0, retries=0, flags=0x2, status=0x370

Co-authored-by: Beomsoo Kim <beomsooo.kim@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Eunsoo Lee <euns212.lee@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Seungcheol Lee <sc108.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 766e9cc4ffca..378d28b2c971 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_batch_req);
 blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req)
 {
 	nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
+	nvme_setup_cmd(req->q->queuedata, req);
 	blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
 	nvme_complete_rq(req);
 	return BLK_STS_OK;
-- 
2.52.0

Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: Add nvme_setup_cmd to host_path_error

[Justin Tee]

Hi Minsik,

> - After
> nvme_setup_cmd: \
> nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, nsid=0, flags=0x0, meta=0x0, \
> cmd=(nvme_admin_identify cns=1, ctrlid=0)
> nvme_complete_rq: \
> nvme0: qid=0, cmdid=32777, res=0x0, retries=0, flags=0x2, status=0x370

> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 766e9cc4ffca..378d28b2c971 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_batch_req);
> blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req)
> {
>         nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
> +       nvme_setup_cmd(req->q->queuedata, req);
>         blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
>         nvme_complete_rq(req);
>         return BLK_STS_OK;

Since trace_nvme_complete_rq is printing only cmdid to help identify
the command, why not define a new TRACE_EVENT(nvme_host_path_error,
...) in trace.h instead?

So, perhaps something like this?

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 5037444687bd..a2e253dbb744 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -511,7 +511,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_batch_req);
  */
 blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req)
 {
+       struct nvme_command *cmd = nvme_req(req)->cmd;
+
        nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
+       cmd->common.command_id = nvme_cid(req);
+       trace_nvme_host_path_error(req, cmd);
        blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
        nvme_complete_rq(req);
        return BLK_STS_OK;

Regards,
Justin

[PATCH v4] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[전민식]

Hi Keith Busch,

If it's host pathing error, Do you mean to skip `trace_nvme_complete_rq()`?
If so, I agree with this approach.

Thank you

Regards,
Minsik Jeon


From c1f3c209c35233154bf5918092bdbb085828db23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:09:57 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v4] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

we were checking host_pathing_error before calling nvme_setup_cmd().
This is caused the command setup to be skipped entirely when a pathing
error occurred, making it impossible to trace the nvme command via
trace_cmd nvme_complete_rq().

As a result, when nvme_complete_rq() logged a completion with cmdid=0,
it was impossible to correlate the completion with the nvme command
request.

This patch Skip trace_nvme_complete_rq() on NVMe host path error.

Co-authored-by: Beomsoo Kim <beomsooo.kim@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Eunsoo Lee <euns212.lee@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Seungcheol Lee <sc108.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 766e9cc4ffca..8f98d5220206 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -458,7 +458,9 @@ void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
 {
 	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl;
 
-	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
+	if (nvme_req(req)->status != NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
+		trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
+
 	nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.52.0

[PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[전민식]

Hi hch,

I added a comment about why I do trace skip if it's host path error.


Thanks

Regards,
Minsik Jeon


From 3ee001c00cb4c7843d7bbb0c11fcc1fafeded9b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:09:57 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

we were checking host_pathing_error before calling nvme_setup_cmd().
This is caused the command setup to be skipped entirely when a pathing
error occurred, making it impossible to trace the nvme command via
trace_cmd nvme_complete_rq().

As a result, when nvme_complete_rq() logged a completion with cmdid=0,
it was impossible to correlate the completion with the nvme command
request.

This patch Skip trace_nvme_complete_rq() on NVMe host path error.

Co-authored-by: Beomsoo Kim <beomsooo.kim@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Eunsoo Lee <euns212.lee@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Seungcheol Lee <sc108.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Minsik Jeon <hmi.jeon@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 766e9cc4ffca..df5a47b8560d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -458,7 +458,14 @@ void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
 {
 	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl;
 
-	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
+	/*
+	 * The idea for these trace events was to match up commands
+	 * dispatched to hardware with the hardware's posted response.
+	 * So skip tracing for undispatched commands.
+	 */
+	if (nvme_req(req)->status != NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
+		trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
+
 	nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.52.0

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[hch]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:51:52PM +0900, 전민식 wrote:
> Hi hch,
> 
> I added a comment about why I do trace skip if it's host path error.

The patch looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

But such note go below the '--' so that don't end up in git history.

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[Keith Busch]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:51:52PM +0900, 전민식 wrote:
>  {
>  	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl;
>  
> -	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> +	/*
> +	 * The idea for these trace events was to match up commands
> +	 * dispatched to hardware with the hardware's posted response.
> +	 * So skip tracing for undispatched commands.
> +	 */
> +	if (nvme_req(req)->status != NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
> +		trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> +

Well, how do we know a controller doesnn't actually return that status
code? I was just suggesting to skip the trace for the condition we never
dispatched the command. An added bonus is we don't need a mostly
unnecessary 'if' check on every IO.

---
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index f5ebcaa2f859c..0dcccdca2965e 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -454,11 +454,10 @@ void nvme_end_req(struct request *req)
 	blk_mq_end_request(req, status);
 }
 
-void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
+static void __nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
 {
 	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl;
 
-	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
 	nvme_cleanup_cmd(req);
 
 	/*
@@ -493,6 +492,12 @@ void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
 		return;
 	}
 }
+
+void nvme_complete_rq(struct request *req)
+{
+	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
+	__nvme_complete_rq(req);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_complete_rq);
 
 void nvme_complete_batch_req(struct request *req)
@@ -513,7 +518,7 @@ blk_status_t nvme_host_path_error(struct request *req)
 {
 	nvme_req(req)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR;
 	blk_mq_set_request_complete(req);
-	nvme_complete_rq(req);
+	__nvme_complete_rq(req);
 	return BLK_STS_OK;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_host_path_error);
--

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[hch]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 08:28:46AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:51:52PM +0900, 전민식 wrote:
> >  {
> >  	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl;
> >  
> > -	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The idea for these trace events was to match up commands
> > +	 * dispatched to hardware with the hardware's posted response.
> > +	 * So skip tracing for undispatched commands.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (nvme_req(req)->status != NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
> > +		trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> > +
> 
> Well, how do we know a controller doesnn't actually return that status
> code? I was just suggesting to skip the trace for the condition we never
> dispatched the command. An added bonus is we don't need a mostly
> unnecessary 'if' check on every IO.

The 7?h error values were added for host use.  The description of
the section in the spec suggests this, but isn't actually as clear
as I would like it.  I wonder if we need to verify that controller
don't incorrectly return it, as that could cause some problems?

Independent of that your patch below looks sane to me.

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[Keith Busch]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:31:24PM +0100, hch@lst.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 08:28:46AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:51:52PM +0900, 전민식 wrote:
> > >  {
> > >  	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = nvme_req(req)->ctrl;
> > >  
> > > -	trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * The idea for these trace events was to match up commands
> > > +	 * dispatched to hardware with the hardware's posted response.
> > > +	 * So skip tracing for undispatched commands.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (nvme_req(req)->status != NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
> > > +		trace_nvme_complete_rq(req);
> > > +
> > 
> > Well, how do we know a controller doesnn't actually return that status
> > code? I was just suggesting to skip the trace for the condition we never
> > dispatched the command. An added bonus is we don't need a mostly
> > unnecessary 'if' check on every IO.
> 
> The 7?h error values were added for host use.  The description of
> the section in the spec suggests this, but isn't actually as clear
> as I would like it.  I wonder if we need to verify that controller
> don't incorrectly return it, as that could cause some problems?

Yeah, the spec is not very clear on their use. It just defines the codes
and a one sentence description, and then never mentioned again. I think
it allows the possibility for the controller to internally complete a
command with such status from some undefined OOB mechanism. I'm not sure
why the host needs to have their own self-generated status codes anyway
since it can already attach whatever arbitrary flags it wants to its
private data, like how we use NVME_REQ_CANCELLED.

Anyway if a controller did return it for whatever reason, even if it is
a bug, we'd want to see it in the trace.

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[전민식]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 08:43 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> Yeah, the spec is not very clear on their use. It just defines the codes
> and a one sentence description, and then never mentioned again. I think
> it allows the possibility for the controller to internally complete a
> command with such status from some undefined OOB mechanism. I'm not sure
> why the host needs to have their own self-generated status codes anyway
> since it can already attach whatever arbitrary flags it wants to its
> private data, like how we use NVME_REQ_CANCELLED.
> 
> Anyway if a controller did return it for whatever reason, even if it is
> a bug, we'd want to see it in the trace.

Sorry, The date is wrong, so I send it again.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 08:43 -0600, hch@lst.de wrote:
-> On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 14:43PM UTC, Keith Busch wrote:

I've confirmed what you discussed, and it seems like the approach you
proposed is a better one.
Can I send patch v7 as above?


Regards,
Minsik Jeon

Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: Skip trace complete_rq on host path error

[전민식]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 03:43PM +0100, hch@lst.de wrote:
> Yeah, the spec is not very clear on their use. It just defines the codes
> and a one sentence description, and then never mentioned again. I think
> it allows the possibility for the controller to internally complete a
> command with such status from some undefined OOB mechanism. I'm not sure
> why the host needs to have their own self-generated status codes anyway
> since it can already attach whatever arbitrary flags it wants to its
> private data, like how we use NVME_REQ_CANCELLED.
> 
> Anyway if a controller did return it for whatever reason, even if it is
> a bug, we'd want to see it in the trace.


I've confirmed what you discussed, and it seems like the approach you
proposed is a better one.
Can I send patch v7 as above?

Regrad,
Minsik Jeon