From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add basic resctrl filesystem support
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:35:34 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610171903510.4991@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476497548-11169-12-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
> + *
> + * More information about RDT be found in the Intel (R) x86 Architecture
> + * Software Developer Manual.
Yes, that's how it should look like.
> +static void l3_qos_cfg_update(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct rdt_resource *r = arg;
> +
> + wrmsrl(IA32_L3_QOS_CFG, r->cdp_enabled);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_l3_qos_cfg(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + struct list_head *l;
> + struct rdt_domain *d;
> + struct cpumask cpu_mask;
You cannot have cpumasks on stack.
cpumask_var_t mask;
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL))
return -ENOMEM;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + cpumask_clear(&cpu_mask);
That can go away then
> + list_for_each(l, &r->domains) {
list_for_each_entry() again
> + d = list_entry(l, struct rdt_domain, list);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_any(&d->cpu_mask), &cpu_mask);
A comment to explain what this does would be helpful.
> + }
> + cpu = get_cpu();
> + /* Update QOS_CFG MSR on this cpu if it's in cpu_mask. */
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask))
> + l3_qos_cfg_update(r);
> + /* Update QOS_CFG MSR on all other cpus in cpu_mask. */
> + smp_call_function_many(&cpu_mask, l3_qos_cfg_update, r, 1);
> + put_cpu();
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_rdtgroupfs_options(char *data)
> +{
> + char *token, *o = data;
> + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3];
> +
> + r->cdp_enabled = false;
> + while ((token = strsep(&o, ",")) != NULL) {
> + if (!*token)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(token, "cdp"))
> + if (r->enabled && r->cdp_capable)
> + r->cdp_enabled = true;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct dentry *rdt_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> + int flags, const char *unused_dev_name,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct dentry *dentry;
> + int ret;
> + bool new_sb;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> + /*
> + * resctrl file system can only be mounted once.
> + */
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&rdt_enable_key)) {
> + dentry = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = parse_rdtgroupfs_options(data);
> + if (ret) {
> + dentry = ERR_PTR(ret);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + dentry = kernfs_mount(fs_type, flags, rdt_root,
> + RDTGROUP_SUPER_MAGIC, &new_sb);
&new_sb is pointless here. It just tells the caller that a new superblock
has been created, So in case of a valid dentry new_sb will always be true,
and if anything failed in kernfs_mount() including the allocation of a new
superblock then new_sb is completely irrelevant as IS_ERR(dentry) will be
true. So you can just hand in NULL because you do not allow multiple
mounts.
> + if (IS_ERR(dentry))
> + goto out;
> + if (!new_sb) {
> + dentry = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].cdp_capable)
> + set_l3_qos_cfg(&rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3]);
> + static_branch_enable(&rdt_enable_key);
> +
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +
> + return dentry;
> +}
> +
> +static void reset_all_cbms(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + struct list_head *l;
> + struct rdt_domain *d;
> + struct msr_param msr_param;
> + struct cpumask cpu_mask;
> + int i, cpu;
> +
> + cpumask_clear(&cpu_mask);
> + msr_param.res = r;
> + msr_param.low = 0;
> + msr_param.high = r->max_closid;
> +
> + list_for_each(l, &r->domains) {
> + d = list_entry(l, struct rdt_domain, list);
list_for_each_entry()
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_any(&d->cpu_mask), &cpu_mask);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < r->max_closid; i++)
> + d->cbm[i] = r->max_cbm;
> + }
> + cpu = get_cpu();
> + /* Update CBM on this cpu if it's in cpu_mask. */
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpu_mask))
> + rdt_cbm_update(&msr_param);
> + /* Updte CBM on all other cpus in cpu_mask. */
Update
> + smp_call_function_many(&cpu_mask, rdt_cbm_update, &msr_param, 1);
> + put_cpu();
> +}
> +
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-15 2:12 [PATCH v4 00/18] Intel Cache Allocation Technology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] Documentation, ABI: Add a document entry for cache id Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] cacheinfo: Introduce " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] x86, intel_cacheinfo: Enable cache id in x86 Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel resource allocation user interface Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add CONFIG, Makefile, and basic initialization Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add Haswell feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 11:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] x86/intel_rdt: Pick up L3/L2 RDT parameters from CPUID Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 13:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 18:06 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 16:35 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:43 ` Yu, Fenghua
2016-10-17 20:20 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 16:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 17:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:22 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] x86/cqm: Move PQR_ASSOC management code into generic code used by both CQM and CAT Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] x86/intel_rdt: Build structures for each resource based on cache topology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 14:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add basic resctrl filesystem support Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add "info" files to resctrl file system Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add mkdir " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:50 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 22:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:00 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-18 1:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 23:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:37 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-18 2:56 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-18 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add tasks files Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 22:17 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add schemata file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add scheduler hook Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for Intel RDT resource allocation Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610171903510.4991@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nilayvaish@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®