From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add tasks files
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:01:01 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610172330350.6407@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476497548-11169-16-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> +struct task_move_callback {
> + struct callback_head work;
> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
Please align the struct members as you did everywhere else already.
> +};
> +
> +static void move_myself(struct callback_head *head)
> +{
> + struct task_move_callback *callback;
> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> +
> + callback = container_of(head, struct task_move_callback, work);
> + rdtgrp = callback->rdtgrp;
> +
> + /* Resource group might have been deleted before process runs */
/*
* If resource group was deleted before this task work callback
* was invoked, then assign the task to root group and free the
* resource group,
*/
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rdtgrp->waitcount) &&
> + (rdtgrp->flags & RDT_DELETED)) {
> + current->closid = 0;
> + kfree(rdtgrp);
> + }
> +
> + kfree(callback);
> +}
> +
> +static int __rdtgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
> +{
> + struct task_move_callback *callback;
> + int ret;
> +
> + callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!callback)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + callback->work.func = move_myself;
> + callback->rdtgrp = rdtgrp;
Lacks a comment:
/*
* Take a refcount, so rdtgrp cannot be freed before the
* callback has been invoked
*/
> + atomic_inc(&rdtgrp->waitcount);
> + ret = task_work_add(tsk, &callback->work, true);
> + if (ret) {
Lacks a comment as well:
/*
* Task is exiting. Drop the refcount and free the callback.
* No need to check the refcount as the group cannot be
* deleted before the write function unlocks rdtgroup_mutex.
*/
For you the comment might be obvious, but I had to lookup the world and
some more.
> + atomic_dec(&rdtgrp->waitcount);
> + kfree(callback);
> + } else {
> + tsk->closid = rdtgrp->closid;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +static int rdtgroup_task_write_permission(struct task_struct *task,
> + struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> +{
> + const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> + const struct cred *tcred = get_task_cred(task);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we only
Sentences start with an uppercase letter.
> + * need to check permissions on one of them.
> + */
> + if (!uid_eq(cred->euid, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID) &&
> + !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->uid) &&
> + !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->suid))
> + ret = -EPERM;
> +
> + put_cred(tcred);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rdtgroup_move_task(pid_t pid, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
> + struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *tsk;
> + int ret;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + if (pid) {
> + tsk = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> + if (!tsk) {
> + ret = -ESRCH;
> + goto out_unlock_rcu;
This goto is pointless as this is the only user,
rcu_read_unlock()l
return -ESRCH;
> + }
> + } else {
> + tsk = current;
> + }
> @@ -559,6 +713,13 @@ static void rmdir_all_sub(void)
> {
> struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> struct list_head *l, *next;
> + struct task_struct *p;
> +
> + /* move all tasks to default resource group */
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process(p)
> + p->closid = 0;
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
Ok.
> + /* Don't allow if there are processes in this group */
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process(p) {
> + if (p->closid == rdtgrp->closid) {
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> + rdtgroup_kn_unlock(kn);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + }
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
I wonder, whether we should simply give those tasks back to the default
group, same as we do with the cpus.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-15 2:12 [PATCH v4 00/18] Intel Cache Allocation Technology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] Documentation, ABI: Add a document entry for cache id Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] cacheinfo: Introduce " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] x86, intel_cacheinfo: Enable cache id in x86 Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel resource allocation user interface Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add CONFIG, Makefile, and basic initialization Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add Haswell feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 11:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] x86/intel_rdt: Pick up L3/L2 RDT parameters from CPUID Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 13:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 18:06 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 16:35 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:43 ` Yu, Fenghua
2016-10-17 20:20 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 16:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 17:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:22 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] x86/cqm: Move PQR_ASSOC management code into generic code used by both CQM and CAT Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] x86/intel_rdt: Build structures for each resource based on cache topology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 14:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add basic resctrl filesystem support Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add "info" files to resctrl file system Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add mkdir " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:50 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 22:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:00 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-18 1:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 23:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:37 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-18 2:56 ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-18 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add tasks files Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-17 22:17 ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add schemata file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add scheduler hook Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15 2:12 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for Intel RDT resource allocation Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610172330350.6407@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nilayvaish@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®