mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
	Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add tasks files
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:01:01 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610172330350.6407@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476497548-11169-16-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> +struct task_move_callback {
> +	struct callback_head work;
> +	struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;

Please align the struct members as you did everywhere else already.

> +};
> +
> +static void move_myself(struct callback_head *head)
> +{
> +	struct task_move_callback *callback;
> +	struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> +
> +	callback = container_of(head, struct task_move_callback, work);
> +	rdtgrp = callback->rdtgrp;
> +
> +	/* Resource group might have been deleted before process runs */

  	/*
	 * If resource group was deleted before this task work callback
	 * was invoked, then assign the task to root group and free the
	 * resource group,
	 */

> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rdtgrp->waitcount) &&
> +	    (rdtgrp->flags & RDT_DELETED)) {
> +		current->closid = 0;
> +		kfree(rdtgrp);
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(callback);
> +}
> +
> +static int __rdtgroup_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +				struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
> +{
> +	struct task_move_callback *callback;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!callback)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	callback->work.func = move_myself;
> +	callback->rdtgrp = rdtgrp;

Lacks a comment:

  	/*
	 * Take a refcount, so rdtgrp cannot be freed before the
	 * callback has been invoked
	 */

> +	atomic_inc(&rdtgrp->waitcount);
> +	ret = task_work_add(tsk, &callback->work, true);
> +	if (ret) {


Lacks a comment as well:

      		/*
		 * Task is exiting. Drop the refcount and free the callback.
		 * No need to check the refcount as the group cannot be
		 * deleted before the write function unlocks rdtgroup_mutex.
		 */

For you the comment might be obvious, but I had to lookup the world and
some more.

> +		atomic_dec(&rdtgrp->waitcount);
> +		kfree(callback);
> +	} else {
> +		tsk->closid = rdtgrp->closid;
> +	}
> +	return ret;

> +static int rdtgroup_task_write_permission(struct task_struct *task,
> +					  struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> +{
> +	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> +	const struct cred *tcred = get_task_cred(task);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we only

Sentences start with an uppercase letter.

> +	 * need to check permissions on one of them.
> +	 */
> +	if (!uid_eq(cred->euid, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID) &&
> +	    !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->uid) &&
> +	    !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->suid))
> +		ret = -EPERM;
> +
> +	put_cred(tcred);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rdtgroup_move_task(pid_t pid, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
> +			      struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	if (pid) {
> +		tsk = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> +		if (!tsk) {
> +			ret = -ESRCH;
> +			goto out_unlock_rcu;

This goto is pointless as this is the only user,

     	     	        rcu_read_unlock()l
			return -ESRCH;

> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		tsk = current;
> +	}

> @@ -559,6 +713,13 @@ static void rmdir_all_sub(void)
>  {
>  	struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
>  	struct list_head *l, *next;
> +	struct task_struct *p;
> +
> +	/* move all tasks to default resource group */
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	for_each_process(p)
> +		p->closid = 0;
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);

Ok.

> +	/* Don't allow if there are processes in this group */
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	for_each_process(p) {
> +		if (p->closid == rdtgrp->closid) {
> +			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +			rdtgroup_kn_unlock(kn);
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);

I wonder, whether we should simply give those tasks back to the default
group, same as we do with the cpus.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-17 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-15  2:12 [PATCH v4 00/18] Intel Cache Allocation Technology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] Documentation, ABI: Add a document entry for cache id Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] cacheinfo: Introduce " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] x86, intel_cacheinfo: Enable cache id in x86 Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] x86/intel_rdt: Feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel resource allocation user interface Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add CONFIG, Makefile, and basic initialization Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 10:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add Haswell feature discovery Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 11:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] x86/intel_rdt: Pick up L3/L2 RDT parameters from CPUID Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 13:45   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 18:06     ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 16:35       ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:43         ` Yu, Fenghua
2016-10-17 20:20           ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 16:54         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 16:53       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 17:02       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:22         ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] x86/cqm: Move PQR_ASSOC management code into generic code used by both CQM and CAT Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] x86/intel_rdt: Build structures for each resource based on cache topology Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 14:44   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add basic resctrl filesystem support Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:35   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add "info" files to resctrl file system Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 19:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add mkdir " Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 21:50     ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 22:52       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:00         ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:10             ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-17 23:25               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-18  1:18     ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 23:20       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-17 23:37         ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-18  2:56           ` Fenghua Yu
2016-10-18 10:44           ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 21:27   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add tasks files Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:01   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-17 22:17     ` Luck, Tony
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add schemata file Fenghua Yu
2016-10-17 22:35   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add scheduler hook Fenghua Yu
2016-10-15  2:12 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for Intel RDT resource allocation Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610172330350.6407@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nilayvaish@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®