From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:14:06 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809021906250.3259@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809022358370.3243@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> + /*
> + * Run 5 calibration loops to get the lowest frequency value
> + * (the best estimate). We use two different calibration modes
> + * here:
> + *
> + * 1) PIT loop. We set the PIT Channel 2 to oneshot mode and
> + * load a timeout of 50ms. We read the time right after we
> + * started the timer and wait until the PIT count down reaches
> + * zero. In each wait loop iteration we read the TSC and check
> + * the delta to the previous read. We keep track of the min
> + * and max values of that delta. The delta is mostly defined
> + * by the IO time of the PIT access, so we can detect when a
> + * SMI/SMM disturbance happend between the two reads. If the
> + * maximum time is significantly larger than the minimum time,
> + * then we discard the result and have another try.
> + *
> + * 2) Reference counter. If available we use the HPET or the
> + * PMTIMER as a reference to check the sanity of that value.
> + * We use separate TSC readouts and check inside of the
> + * reference read for a SMI/SMM disturbance. We dicard
> + * disturbed values here as well. We do that around the PIT
> + * calibration delay loop as we have to wait for a certain
> + * amount of time anyway.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + tscmin = ULONG_MAX;
> + tscmax = 0;
> + pitcnt = 0;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * Read the start value and the reference count of
> + * hpet/pmtimer when available:
> + */
> + tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
This is "wrongish".
You really should do the
tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
...
tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&pm2, hpet ? &hpet2 : NULL);
around the whole loop, because they get more exact with more time inside,
and they don't improve from looping around.
Also, that code is already _too_ unreadable. How about starting by just
moving the PIT calibration into a function of its own, like the appended
patch. And then as a separate patch, improving the heuristics for just the
PIT calibration.
The others are independent of this issue..
Linus
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 8e786b0..bf7ff5a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -122,19 +122,9 @@ static u64 tsc_read_refs(u64 *pm, u64 *hpet)
return ULLONG_MAX;
}
-/**
- * native_calibrate_tsc - calibrate the tsc on boot
- */
-unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
+static unsigned long PIT_calibrate_tsc(void)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- u64 tsc1, tsc2, tr1, tr2, delta, pm1, pm2, hpet1, hpet2;
- int hpet = is_hpet_enabled();
- unsigned int tsc_khz_val = 0;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
-
- tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
+ u64 tr1, tr2, delta;
outb((inb(0x61) & ~0x02) | 0x01, 0x61);
@@ -145,17 +135,30 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
while ((inb(0x61) & 0x20) == 0);
tr2 = get_cycles();
- tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&pm2, hpet ? &hpet2 : NULL);
-
- local_irq_restore(flags);
-
/*
* Preset the result with the raw and inaccurate PIT
* calibration value
*/
delta = (tr2 - tr1);
do_div(delta, 50);
- tsc_khz_val = delta;
+ return delta;
+}
+
+/**
+ * native_calibrate_tsc - calibrate the tsc on boot
+ */
+unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u64 tsc1, tsc2, pm1, pm2, hpet1, hpet2;
+ int hpet = is_hpet_enabled();
+ unsigned int tsc_khz_val;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
+ tsc_khz_val = PIT_calibrate_tsc();
+ tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&pm2, hpet ? &hpet2 : NULL);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
/* hpet or pmtimer available ? */
if (!hpet && !pm1 && !pm2) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-31 22:54 Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 Larry Finger
2008-09-01 11:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 15:37 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 17:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 17:44 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 22:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 23:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 6:37 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02 12:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 23:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 3:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 3:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 4:54 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-02 9:17 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-02 12:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 15:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 18:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 18:41 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-02 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 21:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 22:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 23:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-03 1:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 22:54 ` [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-03 2:14 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-09-03 9:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 1:14 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 2:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 3:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04 3:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 4:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 4:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04 4:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-04 4:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 5:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-04 1:18 ` [PATCH] Change warning message in TSC calibration Alok Kataria
2008-09-03 2:51 ` [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues Larry Finger
2008-09-03 4:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-03 4:34 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-05 13:45 ` Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 Mark Lord
2008-09-02 17:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-09-01 19:36 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 20:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 20:23 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0809021906250.3259@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome