From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc: introduce asm/swab.h
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:01:50 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901062056540.3057@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231303340.14860.61.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Was this tested ? I see no arch maintainer signed-off here, it appears
> to at least break ppc32, and contains hunks that paulus says were
> explicitely nacked (removing of our ld_* macros) etc...
It did no such thing. It just moved the file.
Use
git show -M -B 156ca2bbf6503a02d7d6829886ce381d572de66e
to see how <asm/swab.h> is just the old <asm/byteorder.h> renamed, and
with some stuff moved around. Eg it contains:
-#define __BIG_ENDIAN
-#include <linux/byteorder.h>
because now the <asm/byteorder.h> header file on powerpc will just do
+#include <asm/swab.h>
+#include <linux/byteorder/big_endian.h>
instead of doing that __BIG_ENDIAN define and conditionals that didn't
work with user space.
So it really should be a no-op. And no, I'm not reverting it, because
I guarantee that reverting it won't result in a working build - the broken
<linux/byteorder.h> file no longer exists (and will not be re-instated).
So I'd suggest testing it, and if it really doesn't work, trying to figure
out why. Because a revert won't be helping.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200901070400.n0740Ore002063@hera.kernel.org>
2009-01-07 4:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07 4:48 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-07 4:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07 5:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07 5:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07 5:01 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-01-07 5:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07 5:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07 5:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07 5:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07 5:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07 5:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07 5:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07 6:02 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-07 6:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07 5:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-07 5:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07 8:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0901062056540.3057@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome