mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc: introduce asm/swab.h
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:37:28 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901062122100.3057@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901070017550.26118@xanadu.home>



On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > Can you also verify that it works for you (not just compiles), just so 
> > that I can commit it?
> 
> Tested OK on ARM (using LE mode with networking, etc.)

Ok, I committed it as a quick-fix. I'm not sure that is necessarily the 
final one, but at least it is better than not compiling.

For example, it's kind of silly to use two __fswab32()'s with other 
oddness if that one just falls back on __constant_swab32: maybe we'd want 
to make sure that we'd use ___constant_swab64() in that case, and only do 
the whole __SWAB_64_THRU_32__ if we really have a __arch_swab32() 
function.

Of course, I do hope that anybody who #defines __SWAB_64_THRU_32__ already 
has that __arch_swab32() thing, so it's likely fine.

I also wonder whether gcc generates better code with a union than with 
that 64-bit math...

			Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-07  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200901070400.n0740Ore002063@hera.kernel.org>
2009-01-07  4:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07  4:48   ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-07  4:59     ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07  5:08       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07  5:12         ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07  5:01   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07  5:08     ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07  5:02   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07  5:11     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07  5:19       ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07  5:26         ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-07  5:38           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-07  5:37         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-01-07  6:02           ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-07  6:05           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07  5:39       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-07  5:43       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07  8:37   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0901062122100.3057@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®