From: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 02:09:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asmb0qNsVLfUkIRo@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5be26af3-9d0c-40ce-bf58-9e98ef4a8670@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 10:24:28AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>On 9/21/26 08:48, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
>>Reattach the restored domain to the preserved device using restored
>>domain ID. While reattaching do not setup the context and PASID entries
>>as those are preserved during liveupdate.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
>>---
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 32 +++++--
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 14 +++
>> drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>index c5044e834337..6d3cbe0745c9 100644
>>--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>@@ -2819,6 +2819,9 @@ static int blocking_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> {
>> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>>+ if (dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
>>+ return -EBUSY;
>>+
>> iopf_for_domain_remove(info->domain ? &info->domain->domain : NULL, dev);
>> device_block_translation(dev);
>> return 0;
>>@@ -3187,6 +3190,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> {
>> int ret;
>>+ if (dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
>>+ return intel_iommu_restore_device(domain, dev);
>>+
>> device_block_translation(dev);
>> ret = paging_domain_compatible(domain, dev);
>>@@ -3317,7 +3323,8 @@ static struct iommu_device *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>> info->iommu = iommu;
>> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&info->node);
>> if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
>>- if (ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
>>+ if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev) &&
>>+ ecap_dev_iotlb_support(iommu->ecap) &&
>> pci_ats_supported(pdev) &&
>> dmar_ats_supported(pdev, iommu)) {
>> info->ats_supported = 1;
>>@@ -3421,12 +3428,16 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>> struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>>- iommu_disable_pci_pri(info);
>>- iommu_disable_pci_ats(info);
>>+ if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev)) {
>>+ iommu_disable_pci_pri(info);
>>+ iommu_disable_pci_ats(info);
>>- if (info->pasid_enabled) {
>>- pci_disable_pasid(to_pci_dev(dev));
>>- info->pasid_enabled = 0;
>>+ if (info->pasid_enabled) {
>>+ pci_disable_pasid(to_pci_dev(dev));
>>+ info->pasid_enabled = 0;
>>+ }
>>+ } else {
>>+ intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(dev);
>> }
>> mutex_lock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
>>@@ -3434,11 +3445,13 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>> device_rbtree_remove(info);
>> mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
>>- if (sm_supported(iommu) && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev) &&
>>+ if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev) && sm_supported(iommu) &&
>>+ !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev) &&
>> !context_copied(iommu, info->bus, info->devfn))
>> intel_pasid_teardown_sm_context(dev);
>>- intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
>>+ if (!dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
>>+ intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
>> intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev(info);
>> kfree(info);
>> }
>>@@ -3900,6 +3913,9 @@ static int identity_domain_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>> int ret;
>>+ if (dev_iommu_restored_state(dev))
>>+ return -EBUSY;
>>+
>> device_block_translation(dev);
>> if (dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev))
>>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>index 3a2cb08c0ac1..25104644317c 100644
>>--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
>>@@ -1310,6 +1310,9 @@ void intel_iommu_unpreserve(struct iommu_device *iommu,
>> void clear_unpreserved_context_entries(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
>> void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>> struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser);
>>+int intel_iommu_restore_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>+ struct device *dev);
>>+int intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(struct device *dev);
>> #else
>> static inline void clear_unpreserved_context_entries(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> {
>>@@ -1319,6 +1322,17 @@ static inline void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu
>> struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_ser)
>> {
>> }
>>+
>>+static inline int intel_iommu_restore_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>+ struct device *dev)
>>+{
>>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static inline int intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(struct device *dev)
>>+{
>>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>+}
>> #endif
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
>>index c9e553379683..6e6707eefc8c 100644
>>--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
>>+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/liveupdate.c
>>@@ -351,6 +351,165 @@ void intel_iommu_liveupdate_restore_root_table(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>> BUG_ON(iommu_for_each_preserved_device(_restore_used_domain_ids, iommu));
>> }
>>+static void domain_detach_reattached_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>>+ struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>
>The naming is ambiguous. How about
>
> domain_detach_restored_iommu()
> domain_attach_restored_iommu()
>
>?
This looks good to me. Will update.
>
>>+{
>>+ struct iommu_domain_info *info;
>>+
>>+ guard(mutex)(&iommu->did_lock);
>>+ info = xa_load(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
>>+ if (--info->refcnt == 0) {
>>+ xa_erase(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
>>+ kfree(info);
>>+ }
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int domain_reattach_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>>+ struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>>+ struct iommu_device_ser *device_ser)
>>+{
>>+ struct iommu_domain_info *info, *curr;
>>+ struct iommu_domain_ser *domain_ser;
>>+ struct iommu_hw_ser *iommu_hw_ser;
>>+ int restored_did;
>>+ int ret;
>>+
>>+ if (!iommu_domain_restored_state(&domain->domain))
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ if (!device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.domain_phys ||
>>+ !device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys)
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ domain_ser = phys_to_virt(device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.domain_phys);
>>+ if (domain_ser->restored_domain != &domain->domain)
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ iommu_hw_ser = phys_to_virt(device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys);
>>+ if (iommu_hw_ser->type != IOMMU_INTEL ||
>>+ iommu_hw_ser->intel.phys_addr != iommu->reg_phys)
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ restored_did = device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.attachment_id;
>>+ if (!ida_exists(&iommu->domain_ida, restored_did))
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ info = kzalloc_obj(*info);
>>+ if (!info)
>>+ return -ENOMEM;
>>+
>>+ guard(mutex)(&iommu->did_lock);
>>+ curr = xa_load(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id);
>>+ if (curr) {
>>+ curr->refcnt++;
>>+ kfree(info);
>>+ return 0;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ info->refcnt = 1;
>>+ info->did = restored_did;
>>+ info->iommu = iommu;
>>+ curr = xa_cmpxchg(&domain->iommu_array, iommu->seq_id,
>>+ NULL, info, GFP_KERNEL);
>>+ if (curr) {
>>+ ret = xa_err(curr) ? : -EBUSY;
>>+ goto err_unlock;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+err_unlock:
>>+ kfree(info);
>>+ return ret;
>>+}
>>+
>>+/**
>>+ * intel_iommu_restore_device() - Restore device domain attachment after live update
>>+ * @domain: Restored domain
>>+ * @dev: Restored device
>>+ *
>>+ * Return: 0 on success, or negative error code.
>>+ */
>>+int intel_iommu_restore_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>+ struct device *dev)
>
>How about renaming it intel_iommu_attach_restored_device() to pair with
>the detach helper?
Agreed. Will update.
>
>>+{
>>+ struct iommu_device_ser *device_ser = dev_iommu_restored_state(dev);
>>+ struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>>+ struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
>>+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>>+ unsigned long flags;
>>+ int ret;
>>+
>>+ if (!device_ser)
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ if (dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev))
>>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
>The vmd subdevices rely on the host endpoint to restore the domain
>attachment, so instead of returning an error, it could return 0,
>indicating nothing to do?
This should never happen, as subdevices are not preserved, so this
function is never called for them. It is basically dead code, so I will
drop it.
>
>>+
>>+ ret = domain_reattach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu, device_ser);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ return ret;
>>+
>>+ info->domain = dmar_domain;
>>+ info->domain_attached = true;
>>+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
>>+ list_add(&info->link, &dmar_domain->devices);
>>+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
>>+
>>+ ret = cache_tag_assign_domain(dmar_domain, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ goto err;
>
>The restored domain is an immutable domain. It could only be freed; no
>map and unmap should happen on it. So why do you need to assign a cache
>tag for it?
Interesting.. this is a valid point. I will remove this.
>
>>+
>>+ ret = iopf_for_domain_set(domain, dev);
>
>ATS and PRI are not supported on the preserved devices, so the above is
>dead code, right?
Agreed. Will update.
>
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ goto err;
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+err:
>>+ /*
>>+ * Detach the restored domain from device and iommu on failure, but keep
>>+ * the hardware state intact.
>>+ */
>>+ info->domain_attached = false;
>>+ cache_tag_unassign_domain(info->domain, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
>>+ spin_lock_irqsave(&info->domain->lock, flags);
>>+ list_del(&info->link);
>>+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->domain->lock, flags);
>>+
>>+ domain_detach_reattached_iommu(info->domain, iommu);
>>+ info->domain = NULL;
>>+ return ret;
>>+}
>>+
>>+int intel_iommu_detach_restored_device(struct device *dev)
>>+{
>>+ struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>>+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>>+ struct iommu_domain *domain;
>>+ unsigned long flags;
>>+
>>+ if (!info->domain_attached || !info->domain)
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ domain = &info->domain->domain;
>>+ if (!iommu_domain_restored_state(domain))
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ iopf_for_domain_remove(domain, dev);
>>+ cache_tag_unassign_domain(info->domain, dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
>>+ info->domain_attached = false;
>>+
>>+ spin_lock_irqsave(&info->domain->lock, flags);
>>+ list_del(&info->link);
>>+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->domain->lock, flags);
>>+
>>+ domain_detach_reattached_iommu(info->domain, iommu);
>>+ info->domain = NULL;
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>> /**
>> * intel_iommu_preserve_device() - Intel IOMMU callback to preserve device state
>> * @dev: Target device
>
>Thanks,
>baolu
Thanks,
Sami
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 0:48 [PATCH v5 00/18] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] memfd: export memfd_get_seals() Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-06 23:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-10-10 3:18 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 3:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-10-10 3:27 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-08 7:54 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-10 0:10 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] iommu/vt-d: Clear unpreserved context entries during shutdown Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 0:43 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-10 0:32 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 1:44 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-10 1:58 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 19:44 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-10-10 3:51 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 2:24 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-10 2:09 ` Samiullah Khawaja [this message]
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] iommu/vt-d: Preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-09 3:38 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-10 2:31 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 20:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-10-10 3:52 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-23 23:59 ` John Starks
2026-09-24 17:49 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 21:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-10-10 4:03 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-07 22:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-09-21 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asmb0qNsVLfUkIRo@google.com \
--to=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®