From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Luca Abeni" <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/21] sched/deadline: Do not BUG() on a deadline task with no active CPU allowed
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:59:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxhp05Xmz9LYOo-@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104211207.1392343-6-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Hello,
On 04/11/26 16:11, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> dl_task_root_domain_cpu() finds the root domain that holds a deadline
> task's bandwidth from the first active CPU of the task's mask, and
> BUG()s when the mask has none. A mask can have none:
>
> - a task boosted into the deadline class by priority inheritance keeps
> the affinity of its own policy, which may allow one CPU alone, or a
> cpuset of one. dl_task_needs_bw_move() and set_cpus_allowed_dl()
> take it for a deadline task, dl_task(p) being true, and look the root
> domain up from the mask they are replacing, which allows that CPU,
> inactive by then: the cpuset code updates the masks of a cpuset's
> tasks once the CPU is inactive, and select_fallback_rq() widens the
> mask of a task it pushes off that CPU;
> - with admission control off (sched_rt_runtime_us at -1), a deadline
> task may be pinned to fewer CPUs than its root domain spans, and
> those may all go offline.
>
> Both take the kernel down on the first try, in 8-CPU VMs of v7.4-rc1
> with the four deadline fixes of sched/urgent. The priority inheritance
^^^
Not sure how much sense will this info make when reading this changelog
in the future. :)
> one, which asks for no unusual configuration, through the wakeup of the
> boosted owner:
>
> kernel BUG at kernel/sched/deadline.c:3340!
> CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7
> RIP: 0010:set_cpus_allowed_dl+0xf0/0x100
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> set_cpus_allowed_force+0x9f/0xf0
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback+0x12b/0x1d0
> select_fallback_rq+0x238/0x340
> try_to_wake_up+0x2a0/0xb70
>
> Fall back to the CPU the task last ran on, which these callers used
> before the commit this one fixes. Its root domain may have no active CPU
> left: the previous patch has __dl_sub() and __dl_add() take that. Ten
> rounds of each case leave no warning with it.
>
> Fixes: b4a61fdc19c5 ("sched/deadline: Fix stale root domain in cpuset bandwidth transfer")
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index dadda1a528ec..30a52e42c26d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -3338,13 +3338,19 @@ static void task_woken_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> * current cpus_mask (not yet updated to the new mask) to find the
> * actual root domain. Use cpus_mask rather than cpus_ptr, which
> * may be temporarily narrowed by migrate_disable().
> + *
> + * The mask has no active CPU left when the CPUs it allows went offline,
> + * which the affinity of a deadline task allows with admission control
> + * off, and that of a task boosted into the deadline class by priority
> + * inheritance always: fall back to the CPU the task last ran on.
> */
> static unsigned int dl_task_root_domain_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> unsigned int cpu;
>
> cpu = cpumask_first_and(&p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> - BUG_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);
> + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + cpu = task_cpu(p);
> return cpu;
> }
At least (worst case) we fall back to how things were before my change
introduced the regression.
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 21:11 [PATCH v2 00/21] sched/deadline: bandwidth accounting fixes and selftests Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] sched: Reject SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS before reserving deadline bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 7:14 ` Juri Lelli
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] sched: Refuse SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS that would change the policy Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 7:15 ` Juri Lelli
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] sched/deadline: Do not admit bandwidth for parameters that are kept Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 10:20 ` Juri Lelli
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] sched/deadline: Do not divide by zero active CPUs of a root domain Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 10:53 ` Juri Lelli
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] sched/deadline: Do not BUG() on a deadline task with no active CPU allowed Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 10:59 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] sched/deadline: Do not lose a throttled task switched out and back Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 14:48 ` Juri Lelli
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] sched/deadline: Do not release a departing sleeper's bandwidth twice Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE policy round trips Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 15:00 ` Juri Lelli
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] sched/deadline: Keep departing bandwidth across a root domain rebuild Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 22:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] selftests/sched: Test SCHED_DEADLINE " Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] sched/deadline: Do not take a waking task's bandwidth off a runqueue it left Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] sched/debug: Show the deadline bandwidth of each runqueue Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:11 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] sched/deadline: Rebuild the root domains' accounting without cpusets too Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] sched/deadline: Record the root domain holding a task's bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] sched/deadline: Move a task's bandwidth only where room was made Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] cgroup/cpuset: Give back the bandwidth an attach did not move Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] sched/deadline: Credit a rebuild to a CPU that can hold the bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 0:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] sched: Clear cpuset_locked where the policy check retries Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] sched/deadline: Cancel the replenishment timer with the parameters Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 0:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 21:12 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] sched/deadline: Count the bandwidth a boosted task is given Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-05 0:36 ` sashiko-bot
[not found] ` <CGME20261105111941eucas1p1b50e9720b000ca86204aff3977c9fcbb@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2026-11-05 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] sched/deadline: bandwidth accounting fixes and selftests Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auxhp05Xmz9LYOo-@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®