Re: [PATCH v5 03/29] sched/deadline: Do not admit bandwidth for parameters that are kept

[Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>]

Hello,

On 08/11/26 13:53, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> __sched_setscheduler() runs the deadline admission test on a request
> with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS. But the task keeps its parameters: the
> call skips __setscheduler_params().
> 
> Commit f4dddf90d58d ("sched: Skip priority checks with
> SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS") made sys_sched_setattr() copy the task's own
> parameters into such a request. Then the priority checks pass.
> get_params() copies them without a lock.
> 
> Another call can change the task's parameters before
> __sched_setscheduler() takes the runqueue lock. The request is then
> stale, and dl_param_changed() takes it for a change. sched_dl_overflow()
> would put the stale bandwidth in place of the task's own in total_bw,
> and in this_bw for a sleeping task. But the task keeps its own dl_bw.
> Its release at the 0-lag time takes that dl_bw, and the difference
> stays behind.
> 
> Fix this by skipping sched_dl_overflow() for SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS.
> There is nothing to admit for parameters that are kept.
> 
> Found by reading, after the Sashiko AI review of the first posting of
> this series raised the boosted case of the previous patch. Not
> reproduced: the parameter change must land inside that window.
> 
> Fixes: a509a7cd7974 ("sched/uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> ---

The change looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

>  kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> index 0e8b5c7324f6..894f93a80d5d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -690,8 +690,13 @@ int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>  	 * of a SCHED_DEADLINE task) we need to check if enough bandwidth
>  	 * is available. Keep this check last. If a later check failed,
>  	 * nothing would give back the bandwidth it reserves.
> +	 *
> +	 * With SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS, the task keeps its parameters, so
> +	 * there is nothing to admit. The parameters in attr may also be
> +	 * stale: sys_sched_setattr() read them from the task without a lock.

However I had to wonder what usecase would still make sense for a
KEEP_PARAMS call on a SCHED_DEADLINE task, I would say a !DL params
change (UCLAMP for example) for a (at the moment) DEADLINE task that
might become !DEADLINE in the future? Maybe we could add this to the
comment.

Thanks,
Juri