From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@amd.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
John.Kariuki@amd.com, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Kinsey Ho <kinseyho@google.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com,
Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>,
Stephen Bates <Stephen.Bates@amd.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@kernel.org>, Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add unit tests for descriptor ring reservations
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:53:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avdAkdDahD6nmzUp@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-sdxi-base-v4-14-3668ccc7aab8@amd.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 08:49:55PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Add hardware-independent KUnit tests for full-ring and single-slot
> reservations, invalid counts, inconsistent indices, insufficient space,
> and bounded reservations and descriptor access after ring wrap.
>
> Include the SDXI KUnit configuration and test build support. Run with:
>
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
> --kunitconfig=drivers/dma/sdxi/.kunitconfig
>
> Co-developed-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@amd.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> drivers/dma/sdxi/.kunitconfig | 4 ++
> drivers/dma/sdxi/Kconfig | 10 +++
> drivers/dma/sdxi/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/dma/sdxi/ring_kunit.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sdxi/.kunitconfig b/drivers/dma/sdxi/.kunitconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..16a1ae04b156
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sdxi/.kunitconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +CONFIG_KUNIT=y
> +CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y
> +CONFIG_SDXI_CORE=y
> +CONFIG_SDXI_KUNIT_TEST=y
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sdxi/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/sdxi/Kconfig
> index b91b44231a04..7217375c9216 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sdxi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sdxi/Kconfig
> @@ -26,3 +26,13 @@ config SDXI_PCI
>
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be named "sdxi-pci".
> +
> +config SDXI_KUNIT_TEST
> + tristate "SDXI unit tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + depends on SDXI_CORE && KUNIT
> + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + help
> + KUnit tests for parts of the SDXI driver. Does not require
> + SDXI hardware.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sdxi/Makefile b/drivers/dma/sdxi/Makefile
> index bfcb443f1e64..00e3f1cb0808 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sdxi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sdxi/Makefile
> @@ -7,3 +7,6 @@ sdxi-core-y := \
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SDXI_PCI) += sdxi-pci.o
> sdxi-pci-y := pci.o
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SDXI_KUNIT_TEST) += \
> + ring_kunit.o
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sdxi/ring_kunit.c b/drivers/dma/sdxi/ring_kunit.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7df85fc5549c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sdxi/ring_kunit.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * SDXI descriptor ring management tests.
> + *
> + * Copyright Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + */
> +#include <kunit/device.h>
> +#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> +#include <linux/packing.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +
> +#include "ring.h"
> +#include "submission.h"
> +
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING");
> +
> +/* A submission queue backed by plain memory; no device or DMA required. */
> +static struct sdxi_sq *alloc_sq(struct kunit *t, u32 count)
> +{
> + struct sdxi_sq *sq;
> +
> + sq = kunit_kmalloc(t, struct_size(sq, ring, count),
> + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> + if (sq)
> + sq->count = count;
> + return sq;
> +}
> +
> +static void valid(struct kunit *t)
> +{
> + struct sdxi_ring_state r;
> + struct sdxi_ring_resv resv;
> + struct sdxi_sq *sq;
> +
> + sq = alloc_sq(t, SZ_1K);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(t, sq);
> +
> + sdxi_ring_state_init(&r, sq);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&r, sq->count, &resv), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, resv.range.start, 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, resv.range.end, sq->count - 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_resv_count(&resv), sq->count);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, le64_to_cpu(sq->write_index), sq->count);
> +
> + /* A ring-sized reservation maps slot i onto ring entry i. */
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < sq->count; i++) {
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_resv_index(&resv, i), i);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_desc(&r, i), &sq->ring[i]);
> + }
> +
> + sq->cxt_sts.read_index = cpu_to_le64(1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&r, 1, &resv), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, le64_to_cpu(sq->write_index), sq->count + 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_resv_count(&resv), 1);
> +
> + /* The index space is unwrapped: index sq->count is entry 0. */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_resv_index(&resv, 0), sq->count);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_desc(&r, sq->count), &sq->ring[0]);
> +}
> +
> +static void invalid(struct kunit *t)
> +{
> + struct sdxi_ring_state rs;
> + struct sdxi_ring_resv resv;
> + struct sdxi_sq *sq;
> +
> + sq = alloc_sq(t, SZ_1K);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(t, sq);
> +
> + sdxi_ring_state_init(&rs, sq);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&rs, 0, &resv), -EINVAL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&rs, sq->count + 1, &resv), -EINVAL);
> +
> + sq->cxt_sts.read_index = cpu_to_le64(1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&rs, 1, &resv), -EIO);
> +
> + sq->cxt_sts.read_index = 0;
> + sq->write_index = cpu_to_le64(sq->count);
> + sdxi_ring_state_init(&rs, sq);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&rs, 1, &resv), -EBUSY);
> +
> + sq->cxt_sts.read_index = cpu_to_le64(sq->count);
> + sq->write_index = cpu_to_le64(sq->count + 1);
> + sdxi_ring_state_init(&rs, sq);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve(&rs, sq->count, &resv), -EBUSY);
> +}
> +
> +static void bounded_reservations(struct kunit *t)
> +{
> + struct sdxi_ring_state rs;
> + struct sdxi_ring_resv resv;
> + struct sdxi_sq *sq = alloc_sq(t, SZ_1K);
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(t, sq);
> + sdxi_ring_state_init(&rs, sq);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 0, 2, &resv), -EINVAL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 3, 2, &resv), -EINVAL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 2, sq->count + 1, &resv),
> + -EINVAL);
> +
> + sq->write_index = cpu_to_le64(sq->count - 2);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 2, 10, &resv), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_resv_count(&resv), 2);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, resv.range.start, sq->count - 2);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 2, 10, &resv), -EBUSY);
> + sq->cxt_sts.read_index = cpu_to_le64(1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 2, 10, &resv), -EBUSY);
> + sq->cxt_sts.read_index = cpu_to_le64(5);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_try_reserve_range(&rs, 2, 10, &resv), 0);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, sdxi_ring_resv_count(&resv), 5);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(t, sdxi_slot_desc(sdxi_ring_resv_slot(&resv, 0)),
> + &sq->ring[0]);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case testcases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(valid),
> + KUNIT_CASE(invalid),
> + KUNIT_CASE(bounded_reservations),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static int setup_device(struct kunit *t)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = kunit_device_register(t, "sdxi-mock-device");
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(t, dev);
> + t->priv = dev;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite generic_desc_ts = {
> + .name = "SDXI descriptor ring management",
> + .test_cases = testcases,
> + .init = setup_device,
> +};
> +kunit_test_suite(generic_desc_ts);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SDXI descriptor ring tests");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Nathan Lynch");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> --
> 2.56.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 2:49 [PATCH v4 00/25] dmaengine: Smart Data Accelerator Interface (SDXI) basic support Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/25] PCI: Add SNIA SDXI accelerator sub-class Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-05 18:10 ` Frank Li
2026-11-05 18:25 ` Lynch, Nathan
2026-11-12 21:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/25] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for SDXI driver Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 21:19 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add PCI initialization Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-05 17:59 ` Frank Li
2026-11-05 18:07 ` Lynch, Nathan
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Prepare function and sanitize MMIO state Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 21:26 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Feature discovery and initial configuration Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 21:32 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Configure context tables Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 21:49 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Allocate context control DMA pool Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 21:50 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Introduce submission queue Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 21:58 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Allocate administrative context Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 22:10 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Install " Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 22:17 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Start functions on probe, stop on remove Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 16:44 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add client context allocation API Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 16:46 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 13/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add descriptor ring management Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 16:51 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 14/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add unit tests for descriptor ring reservations Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 16:53 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 15/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Per-context access key (AKey) table entry allocator Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 16:55 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 16/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add completion status block API Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:04 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 17/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add unit tests for completion pool ownership Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:07 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:49 ` [PATCH v4 18/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add context submission helper Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:12 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 19/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Encode context start, stop, update, and sync descriptors Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-05 16:52 ` Tycho Andersen
2026-11-13 17:17 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 20/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add client context release with update and sync Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:23 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 21/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Provide context start and stop APIs Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:24 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 22/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Encode copy and interrupt descriptors Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-05 17:00 ` Tycho Andersen
2026-11-13 17:28 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 23/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add unit tests for descriptor encoding Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:29 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 24/25] dmaengine: sdxi: MSI/MSI-X vector allocation and mapping Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:36 ` Frank Li
2026-11-04 2:50 ` [PATCH v4 25/25] dmaengine: sdxi: Add DMA engine provider Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay
2026-11-13 17:50 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avdAkdDahD6nmzUp@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=John.Kariuki@amd.com \
--cc=PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@amd.com \
--cc=Stephen.Bates@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kinseyho@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nathan.lynch@amd.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=tycho@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®