From: neil.armstrong@linaro.org
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v6 2/5] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin data for SM8550 / A740
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:56:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b989522d-bd41-4d76-91a9-3cf680214003@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <892fc1eb-efd3-4fb6-9110-2df3349960a6@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 30/04/2025 18:39, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4/30/25 6:19 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
>> On 30/04/2025 17:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 4/30/25 4:49 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
>>>> On 30/04/2025 15:09, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> On 4/30/25 2:49 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
>>>>>> On 30/04/2025 14:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/30/25 2:26 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30/04/2025 13:34, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Add speebin data for A740, as found on SM8550 and derivative SoCs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For non-development SoCs it seems that "everything except FC_AC, FC_AF
>>>>>>>>> should be speedbin 1", but what the values are for said "everything" are
>>>>>>>>> not known, so that's an exercise left to the user..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>>>>>> index 53e2ff4406d8f0afe474aaafbf0e459ef8f4577d..61daa331567925e529deae5e25d6fb63a8ba8375 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
>>>>>>>>> #include "a6xx.xml.h"
>>>>>>>>> #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h"
>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/socinfo.h>
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> static const struct adreno_reglist a612_hwcg[] = {
>>>>>>>>> {REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL_SP0, 0x22222222},
>>>>>>>>> {REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL2_SP0, 0x02222220},
>>>>>>>>> @@ -1431,6 +1434,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>>>>>>> },
>>>>>>>>> .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
>>>>>>>>> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>>>>>>>> + .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>>>>>>>>> + { ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AC), 0 },
>>>>>>>>> + { ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AF), 0 },
>>>>>>>>> + /* Other feature codes (on prod SoCs) should match to speedbin 1 */
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to understand this sentence. because reading patch 4, when there's no match
>>>>>>>> devm_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() is simply never called so how can it match speedbin 1 ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I'm saying is that all other entries that happen to be possibly
>>>>>>> added down the line are expected to be speedbin 1 (i.e. BIT(1))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Before this change the fallback was speedbin = BIT(0), but this disappeared.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, the default was to allow speedbin mask ~(0U)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm no:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> supp_hw = fuse_to_supp_hw(info, speedbin);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (supp_hw == UINT_MAX) {
>>>>>> DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
>>>>>> "missing support for speed-bin: %u. Some OPPs may not be supported by hardware\n",
>>>>>> speedbin);
>>>>>> supp_hw = BIT(0); /* Default */
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ret = devm_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(dev, &supp_hw, 1);
>>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>
>>>>> Right, that's my own code even..
>>>>>
>>>>> in any case, the kernel can't know about the speed bins that aren't
>>>>> defined and here we only define bin0, which doesn't break things
>>>>>
>>>>> the kernel isn't aware about hw with bin1 with or without this change
>>>>> so it effectively doesn't matter
>>>>
>>>> But it's regression for the other platforms, where before an unknown SKU
>>>> mapped to supp_hw=BIT(0)
>>>>
>>>> Not calling devm_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() is a major regression,
>>>> if the opp-supported-hw is present, the OPP will be rejected:
>>>
>>> A comment in patch 4 explains that. We can either be forwards or backwards
>>> compatible (i.e. accept a limited amount of
>>> speedbin_in_driver x speedbin_in_dt combinations)
>>
>> I have a hard time understanding the change, please be much more verbose
>> in the cover letter and commit messages.
>>
>> The fact that you do such a large change in the speedbin policy in patch 4
>> makes it hard to understand why it's needed in the first place.
>>
>> Finally I'm very concerned that "old" SM8550 DT won't work on new kernels,
>> this is frankly unacceptable, and this should be addressed in the first
>> place.
>>
>> The nvmem situation was much simple, where we considered we added the nvmem
>> property at the same time as opp-supported-hw in OPPs, but it's no more the
>> case.
>>
>> So I think the OPP API should probably be extended to address this situation
>> first, since if we do not have the opp-supported-hw in OPPs, all OPPs are safe.
>>
>> So this code:
>> count = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "opp-supported-hw");
>> if (count <= 0 || count % levels) {
>> dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (%d)\n",
>> __func__, count);
>> return false;
>> }
>> should return true in this specific case, like a supported_hw_failsafe mode.
>
> Not really. opp-supported-hws = <BIT(0)> usually translates to the *fastest*
> bin in our case, so perhaps that change I made previously to default to it
> wasn't the wisest. In other words, all slower SKUs that weren't added to the
> kernel catalog & dt are potentially getting overclocked, which is no bueno.
> That is not always the case, but it most certainly has been for a number of
> years.
>
> Old DTs in this case would be DTs lacking opp-supported-hw with the kernel
> having speedbin tables. The inverse ("too new DTs") case translates into
> "someone put some unexpected stuff in dt and the kernel has no idea what
> to do with it".
> In this context, old DTs would continue to work after patch 4, as the first
> early return in adreno_set_speedbin() takes care of that.
No.
With only patches 1-4 applied (keep "old" DT) on today's -next:
SM8550-QRD:
[ 7.574569] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops [msm])
[ 7.586578] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae90000.displayport-controller (ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops [msm])
[ 7.597886] adreno 3d00000.gpu: error -EINVAL: Unknown speed bin fuse value: 0x2
[ 7.605518] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: failed to load adreno gpu
[ 7.612599] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: failed to bind 3d00000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops [msm]): -22
SM8550-HDK:
[ 10.137558] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops [msm])
[ 10.151796] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae90000.displayport-controller (ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops [msm])
[ 10.163358] adreno 3d00000.gpu: error -EINVAL: Unknown speed bin fuse value: 0x2
[ 10.171066] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: failed to load adreno gpu
[ 10.178118] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: failed to bind 3d00000.gpu (ops a3xx_ops [msm]): -22
With:
=================><==================
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
index 61daa3315679..7cac14a585a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
@@ -1435,6 +1435,7 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
.address_space_size = SZ_16G,
.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
+ { ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AB), 1 },
{ ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AC), 0 },
{ ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AF), 0 },
/* Other feature codes (on prod SoCs) should match to speedbin 1 */
=================><==================
SM8550-QRD:
[ 7.681816] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops [msm])
[ 7.694479] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae90000.displayport-controller (ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops [msm])
[ 7.705784] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.714322] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722851] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722853] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722855] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722856] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722858] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722860] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 7.722861] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _of_add_opp_table_v2: no supported OPPs
[ 7.722863] adreno 3d00000.gpu: [drm:adreno_gpu_init [msm]] *ERROR* Unable to set the OPP table
SM8550-HDK:
[ 10.119986] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae94000.dsi (ops dsi_ops [msm])
[ 10.133872] msm_dpu ae01000.display-controller: bound ae90000.displayport-controller (ops msm_dp_display_comp_ops [msm])
[ 10.147377] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.161640] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.171198] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.179756] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.188313] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.196868] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.205424] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.226025] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _opp_is_supported: Invalid opp-supported-hw property (-22)
[ 10.234589] adreno 3d00000.gpu: _of_add_opp_table_v2: no supported OPPs
[ 10.247165] adreno 3d00000.gpu: [drm:adreno_gpu_init [msm]] *ERROR* Unable to set the OPP table
This behaves exactly as I said, so please fix it.
Neil
>
> Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 11:34 [RFT PATCH v6 0/5] Add SMEM-based speedbin matching Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 11:34 ` [PATCH RFT v6 1/5] drm/msm/adreno: Implement SMEM-based speed bin Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 16:20 ` neil.armstrong
2025-04-30 16:25 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 11:34 ` [PATCH RFT v6 2/5] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin data for SM8550 / A740 Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 12:26 ` neil.armstrong
2025-04-30 12:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 12:49 ` neil.armstrong
2025-04-30 13:09 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 14:49 ` neil.armstrong
2025-04-30 15:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 16:19 ` neil.armstrong
2025-04-30 16:39 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 16:56 ` neil.armstrong [this message]
2025-05-01 9:29 ` Akhil P Oommen
2025-05-01 15:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-05-11 9:51 ` Akhil P Oommen
2025-05-22 16:02 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-05-22 17:33 ` Rob Clark
2025-04-30 11:34 ` [PATCH RFT v6 3/5] drm/msm/adreno: Define A530 speed bins explicitly Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 11:34 ` [PATCH RFT v6 4/5] drm/msm/adreno: Redo the speedbin assignment Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-30 11:34 ` [PATCH RFT v6 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Wire up GPU speed bin & more OPPs Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b989522d-bd41-4d76-91a9-3cf680214003@linaro.org \
--to=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®