Re: [PATCH RFT v6 2/5] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin data for SM8550 / A740

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 4/30/25 2:49 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
> On 30/04/2025 14:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 4/30/25 2:26 PM, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 30/04/2025 13:34, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> Add speebin data for A740, as found on SM8550 and derivative SoCs.
>>>>
>>>> For non-development SoCs it seems that "everything except FC_AC, FC_AF
>>>> should be speedbin 1", but what the values are for said "everything" are
>>>> not known, so that's an exercise left to the user..
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> index 53e2ff4406d8f0afe474aaafbf0e459ef8f4577d..61daa331567925e529deae5e25d6fb63a8ba8375 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
>>>>    #include "a6xx.xml.h"
>>>>    #include "a6xx_gmu.xml.h"
>>>>    +#include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/socinfo.h>
>>>> +
>>>>    static const struct adreno_reglist a612_hwcg[] = {
>>>>        {REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL_SP0, 0x22222222},
>>>>        {REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL2_SP0, 0x02222220},
>>>> @@ -1431,6 +1434,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>>            },
>>>>            .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
>>>>            .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>>> +        .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>>>> +            { ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AC), 0 },
>>>> +            { ADRENO_SKU_ID(SOCINFO_FC_AF), 0 },
>>>> +            /* Other feature codes (on prod SoCs) should match to speedbin 1 */
>>>
>>> I'm trying to understand this sentence. because reading patch 4, when there's no match
>>> devm_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() is simply never called so how can it match speedbin 1 ?
>>
>> What I'm saying is that all other entries that happen to be possibly
>> added down the line are expected to be speedbin 1 (i.e. BIT(1))
>>
>>> Before this change the fallback was speedbin = BIT(0), but this disappeared.
>>
>> No, the default was to allow speedbin mask ~(0U)
> 
> Hmm no:
> 
>     supp_hw = fuse_to_supp_hw(info, speedbin);
> 
>     if (supp_hw == UINT_MAX) {
>         DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
>             "missing support for speed-bin: %u. Some OPPs may not be supported by hardware\n",
>             speedbin);
>         supp_hw = BIT(0); /* Default */
>     }
> 
>     ret = devm_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(dev, &supp_hw, 1);
>     if (ret)
>         return ret;

Right, that's my own code even..

in any case, the kernel can't know about the speed bins that aren't
defined and here we only define bin0, which doesn't break things

the kernel isn't aware about hw with bin1 with or without this change
so it effectively doesn't matter

Konrad