From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 17/18] x86/speculation: Update SPEC_CTRL MSRs of remote CPUs
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 13:33:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e726103b-7689-d9bc-4f39-98ca4b57ec2b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e41a9d15-f667-ebb5-3fbb-91f14ae034a3@linux.intel.com>
On 11/06/2018 07:18 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> Thomas,
>
>>>> 2) Add _TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL to the SYSCALL_EXIT_WORK_FLAGS and handle it
>>>> in the slow work path.
>>> There can be tasks that don't do any syscalls, and it seems like we can
>>> have MSRs getting out of sync?
>> Setting the TIF flag directly in a remote task is wrong. It needs to be
>> handled when the _TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL is evaluated, i.e. the information
>> needs to be stored process wide e.g. in task->mm.
>>
>> But yes, if the remote task runs in user space forever, it won't
>> help. Though the point is that dumpable is usually set when the process
>> starts, so it's probably mostly a theoretical issue.
>>
> I took a crack to implement what you suggested to update
> remote task's flag and remote SPEC_CTRL MSR on the syscall exit slow path.
>
> This looks reasobale?
>
> Tim
>
>
> ------------
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index 3b2490b..614594a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ __visible inline void prepare_exit_to_usermode(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> #define SYSCALL_EXIT_WORK_FLAGS \
> (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
> - _TIF_SINGLESTEP | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
> + _TIF_SINGLESTEP | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL)
>
> static void syscall_slow_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 cached_flags)
> {
> @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ static void syscall_slow_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 cached_flags)
> if (cached_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
> trace_sys_exit(regs, regs->ax);
>
> + if (cached_flags & _TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL)
> + spec_ctrl_do_pending_update();
> /*
> * If TIF_SYSCALL_EMU is set, we only get here because of
> * TIF_SINGLESTEP (i.e. this is PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP).
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> index c59a6c4..f124597 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ static inline void indirect_branch_prediction_barrier(void)
> alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, val, X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB);
> }
>
> +void spec_ctrl_do_pending_update(void);
> +
> /* The Intel SPEC CTRL MSR base value cache */
> extern u64 x86_spec_ctrl_base;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 4f6a7a9..b78db59 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct thread_info {
> #define TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY 14 /* Notify kernel of userspace return */
> #define TIF_PATCH_PENDING 15 /* Pending live patching update */
> #define TIF_FSCHECK 16 /* Check FS is USER_DS on return */
> +#define TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL 17 /* Pending update of speculation control */
>
> /* Task status */
> #define TIF_UPROBE 18 /* Breakpointed or singlestepping */
> @@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ struct thread_info {
> #define _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY (1 << TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY)
> #define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING (1 << TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> #define _TIF_FSCHECK (1 << TIF_FSCHECK)
> +#define _TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL (1 << TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL)
>
> #define _TIF_UPROBE (1 << TIF_UPROBE)
> #define _TIF_MEMDIE (1 << TIF_MEMDIE)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 4c15c86..d82d3f8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/nospec.h>
> #include <linux/prctl.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/coredump.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>
> #include <asm/spec-ctrl.h>
> #include <asm/cmdline.h>
> @@ -770,6 +772,69 @@ static int ssb_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void set_task_stibp(struct task_struct *tsk, bool stibp_on)
> +{
> + bool update = false;
> +
> + if (stibp_on)
> + update = !test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_STIBP);
> + else
> + update = test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_STIBP);
> +
> + if (tsk == current && update)
> + speculation_ctrl_update_current();
> +}
> +
> +void spec_ctrl_do_pending_update(void)
> +{
> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&spectre_v2_app_lite))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
> +
> + if (get_dumpable(current->mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER)
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_STIBP);
> + else
> + clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_STIBP);
> +
> + clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL);
> + speculation_ctrl_update_current();
> +}
> +
> +int arch_update_spec_ctrl_restriction(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct task_struct *t;
> + bool stibp_on = false;
> +
> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&spectre_v2_app_lite))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!task->mm)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!lock_task_sighand(task, &flags))
> + return -ESRCH;
> +
> + if (get_dumpable(task->mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER)
> + stibp_on = true;
> +
> + for_each_thread(task, t) {
> + if (task_cpu(task) == smp_processor_id())
> + set_task_stibp(task, stibp_on);
I think "t" is the iterator, not "task". BTW, a thread is on the same
CPU doesn't mean it is running. Should you just check "(t == current)" here?
> + else if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_STIBP) != stibp_on)
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_UPDATE_SPEC_CTRL);
> + }
> +
> + unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long which,
> unsigned long ctrl)
> {
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-30 18:49 [Patch v4 00/18] Provide process property based options to enable Spectre v2 userspace-userspace protection* Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 01/18] x86/speculation: Clean up spectre_v2_parse_cmdline() Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 02/18] x86/speculation: Remove unnecessary ret variable in cpu_show_common() Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 03/18] x86/speculation: Reorganize cpu_show_common() Tim Chen
2018-11-03 18:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-05 19:12 ` Tim Chen
2018-11-05 19:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 04/18] x86/speculation: Add X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_ENHANCED Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 05/18] x86/speculation: Disable STIBP when enhanced IBRS is in use Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 06/18] smt: Create cpu_smt_enabled static key for SMT specific code Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 07/18] x86/smt: Convert cpu_smt_control check to cpu_smt_enabled static key Tim Chen
2018-11-03 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-08 1:43 ` Tim Chen
2018-11-08 11:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 08/18] sched: Deprecate sched_smt_present and use " Tim Chen
2018-11-03 18:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-09 22:08 ` Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 09/18] x86/speculation: Rename SSBD update functions Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 10/18] x86/speculation: Reorganize speculation control MSRs update Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 11/18] x86/speculation: Update comment on TIF_SSBD Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 12/18] x86: Group thread info flags by functionality Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 13/18] security: Update security level of a process when modifying its dumpability Tim Chen
2018-10-30 20:57 ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-10-30 21:30 ` Tim Chen
2018-10-30 21:53 ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 14/18] x86/speculation: Turn on or off STIBP according to a task's TIF_STIBP Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 15/18] x86/speculation: Add Spectre v2 app to app protection modes Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 16/18] x86/speculation: Enable STIBP to protect security sensitive tasks Tim Chen
2018-10-30 21:07 ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-10-30 21:34 ` Tim Chen
2018-10-30 22:02 ` Schaufler, Casey
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 17/18] x86/speculation: Update SPEC_CTRL MSRs of remote CPUs Tim Chen
2018-11-04 19:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-05 22:02 ` Tim Chen
2018-11-05 23:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-05 23:59 ` Tim Chen
2018-11-06 7:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-07 0:18 ` Tim Chen
2018-11-07 18:33 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-11-07 23:15 ` Tim Chen
2018-11-07 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-08 0:22 ` Tim Chen
2018-10-30 18:49 ` [Patch v4 18/18] x86/speculation: Create PRCTL interface to restrict indirect branch speculation Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e726103b-7689-d9bc-4f39-98ca4b57ec2b@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®