From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
"Maciej Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
David E Box <david.e.box@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/25] x86/resctrl: Check if monitoring features are supported
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 16:25:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f20e9525-66c8-4fb1-8b11-789c72532840@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928221509.68002-4-tony.luck@intel.com>
Hi Tony,
On 9/28/26 3:14 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Both Intel and AMD manuals say that software must first check
> CPUID(0x7,0x0).EBX[12] to see if any monitoring features are supported before
> checking for resource specific features supported in subleaves.
>
> Each of the L3 monitoring features is further gated by CPUID(0xF,0x0).EDX[1].
>
> Add checks for these feature bits.
>
> Maintainer note: No need to backport this fix. No issues have been seen
> from this failure to follow the exact enumeration process in the manual.
>
> Fixes: cbc82b172638 ("x86: Add support for Intel Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) detection")
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> v13:
v12 feedback at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/430f74d4-5d04-4f95-b7e9-83dcd5cd5ba5@intel.com/
> Dropped (Linux: X86_FEATURE_*) from commit comment
My comment was only about the "Linux:" caveat, ideally applied to previous patch also.
The feature flags are useful.
> s/specific features/resource specific features/
Suggestion was "resource specific monitoring features" to emphasize connection with
"monitoring features" that precedes it.
> s/L3-based monitoring features/L3 monitoring features/
Suggestion was "L3 resource monitoring features" with intention to connect
it to first paragraph usage of resource.
> Added maintainer note about not back porting.
Maintainer notes are not intended to be included during merge and should thus
be below the "---".
I did give preliminary Reviewed-by tag in previous version. Giving it again should not
be necessary since I am just repeating myself here.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 22:14 [PATCH v13 00/25] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 01/25] fs/resctrl: Ensure default group reports tasks on monitor-only systems Tony Luck
2026-10-08 22:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 02/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add missing CQM feature dependency Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 03/25] x86/resctrl: Check if monitoring features are supported Tony Luck
2026-10-08 23:25 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 04/25] x86/resctrl: Centralize monitoring feature enumeration Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 05/25] x86/resctrl: Apply Intel MBM quirk from rdt_get_l3_mon_config() Tony Luck
2026-10-09 17:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 06/25] x86/resctrl: Delete resctrl_cpu_detect() Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 07/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture resctrl_arch_{alloc,mon}_capable() Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 08/25] x86/resctrl: Update special case for Intel Haswell enumeration Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 09/25] x86/resctrl: Delete rdt_alloc_capable and rdt_mon_capable Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 10/25] fs/resctrl: Remove redundant calls to resctrl_mon_capable() Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 11/25] x86/resctrl: Honor rdt={perf|energy} options to force enable AET events Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 12/25] fs/resctrl: Add interface to disable a monitor event Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 13/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Allocate maximum needed rmid_ptrs[] Tony Luck
2026-10-06 19:53 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-06 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
2026-10-07 14:10 ` Moger, Babu
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 14/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Use right size for L3 monitor data structures Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:14 ` [PATCH v13 15/25] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle systems where AET is the only resource Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 16/25] x86/resctrl: Add PMT registration API for AET enumeration callbacks Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 17/25] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Register enumeration functions with resctrl Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 18/25] x86/resctrl: Use registered function pointers for AET enumeration Tony Luck
2026-09-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v14.1 " Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 19/25] arm,x86,fs/resctrl: Enumerate AET on every resctrl mount Tony Luck
2026-09-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v14.1 " Tony Luck
2026-10-07 19:55 ` Babu Moger
2026-10-07 20:43 ` Luck, Tony
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 20/25] x86/resctrl: Enforce system RMID limit on AET Tony Luck
2026-09-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v14.1 " Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 21/25] x86/resctrl: Export interface to report telemetry unbind/remove Tony Luck
2026-09-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v14.1 " Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 22/25] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Inform resctrl when MMIO maps are being removed Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 23/25] x86/resctrl: Require 64-bit x86 for resctrl support Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 24/25] x86/resctrl: Simplify Kconfig options for resctrl Tony Luck
2026-09-28 22:15 ` [PATCH v13 25/25] x86,fs/resctrl: Document telemetry mount timing caveat Tony Luck
2026-09-29 0:29 ` [PATCH v13 00/25] Allow AET to use PMT as loadable module Luck, Tony
2026-09-29 19:43 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f20e9525-66c8-4fb1-8b11-789c72532840@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®