* [PATCH RFT] mailbox: exynos: drop superfluous mbox setting per channel
@ 2026-03-09 7:39 Wolfram Sang
2026-03-10 12:05 ` Tudor Ambarus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2026-03-09 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-renesas-soc
Cc: linux-kernel, Wolfram Sang, Tudor Ambarus, Jassi Brar,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Alim Akhtar, linux-samsung-soc,
linux-arm-kernel
The core initializes the 'mbox' field exactly like this, so don't
duplicate it in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
Only build-tested. Found because I made the same mistake in my
to-be-upstreamed driver and then looked for that pattern. Testing would
be still much appreciated!
drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c
index 5f2d3b81c1db..d2355b128ba4 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ static int exynos_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct mbox_controller *mbox;
struct mbox_chan *chans;
struct clk *pclk;
- int i;
exynos_mbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!exynos_mbox)
@@ -129,9 +128,6 @@ static int exynos_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mbox->ops = &exynos_mbox_chan_ops;
mbox->of_xlate = exynos_mbox_of_xlate;
- for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS_MBOX_CHAN_COUNT; i++)
- chans[i].mbox = mbox;
-
exynos_mbox->mbox = mbox;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, exynos_mbox);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RFT] mailbox: exynos: drop superfluous mbox setting per channel
2026-03-09 7:39 [PATCH RFT] mailbox: exynos: drop superfluous mbox setting per channel Wolfram Sang
@ 2026-03-10 12:05 ` Tudor Ambarus
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tudor Ambarus @ 2026-03-10 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, linux-renesas-soc
Cc: linux-kernel, Jassi Brar, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Alim Akhtar,
linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel
On 3/9/26 9:39 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The core initializes the 'mbox' field exactly like this, so don't
> duplicate it in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Only build-tested. Found because I made the same mistake in my
> to-be-upstreamed driver and then looked for that pattern. Testing would
> be still much appreciated!
>
> drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c
> index 5f2d3b81c1db..d2355b128ba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/exynos-mailbox.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ static int exynos_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> struct mbox_chan *chans;
> struct clk *pclk;
> - int i;
>
> exynos_mbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!exynos_mbox)
> @@ -129,9 +128,6 @@ static int exynos_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mbox->ops = &exynos_mbox_chan_ops;
> mbox->of_xlate = exynos_mbox_of_xlate;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < EXYNOS_MBOX_CHAN_COUNT; i++)
> - chans[i].mbox = mbox;
> -
> exynos_mbox->mbox = mbox;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, exynos_mbox);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-10 12:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-09 7:39 [PATCH RFT] mailbox: exynos: drop superfluous mbox setting per channel Wolfram Sang
2026-03-10 12:05 ` Tudor Ambarus
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®