mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:21:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49pp0ggntr.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444793448-9994-4-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> (Ming Lei's message of "Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:30:47 +0800")

Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> writes:

> It isn't necessary to try to merge the bio which is marked
> as NOMERGE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 546b3b8..deb5f4c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -671,6 +671,9 @@ static bool blk_mq_attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
>  	struct request *rq;
>  	int checked = 8;
>  
> +	if (!bio_mergeable(bio))
> +		return false;
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, &ctx->rq_list, queuelist) {
>  		int el_ret;
>  
> @@ -1140,7 +1143,7 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_merge_queue_io(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  					 struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
>  					 struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
>  {
> -	if (!hctx_allow_merges(hctx)) {
> +	if (!hctx_allow_merges(hctx) || !bio_mergeable(bio)) {
>  		blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
>  		spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
>  insert_rq:

blk_mq_attempt_merge is only called from blk_mq_merge_queue_io.  So, by
adding the conditional in blk_mq_merge_queue_io, you don't need any
change in blk_mq_attempt_merge.

Also, why haven't you updated the non-multiqueue code paths similarly?

Cheers,
Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14  3:30 [PATCH 0/4] block: some misc changes Ming Lei
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:14   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: avoid to merge splitted bio Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:15   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: check bio_mergeable() early before merging Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:21   ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2015-10-16  0:26     ` Ming Lei
2015-10-14  3:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: mark ctx as pending at batch in flush plug path Ming Lei
2015-10-15 15:26   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-16  0:24     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49pp0ggntr.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®